Container Shipping into Australia: What Happens Next, and Why Exports Matter More Than You Think
It is the first week of November. Your Christmas stock is either on the water or it is late. Your forwarder is quoting a peak season surcharge from 1 November on top of a rate restoration from 15 October, and the vessel you booked three weeks ahead has just been rolled. Your empty containers are sitting in a yard in Laverton or Port Botany waiting for a dehire slot while the shipping line’s detention clock keeps running.
And underneath the week-to-week noise there is a question we hear from Australian importers more and more: have our export markets dried up to the point that shipping lines no longer care about serving Australia competitively?
This article does three things. It sets out where the market actually is as of late October 2026. It tests that export question properly, because it is half right and the half that is wrong matters. And it forecasts where container shipping rates into Australia, capacity and reliability go from here, through peak season, past Chinese New Year and into a 2027 that every major analyst expects to look very different from 2026.
Where the market is right now
Globally, rates are high and being held there deliberately. Drewry’s World Container Index rose 2 per cent to US$4,585 per 40ft container in the week to 22 October, driven by Asia to Europe and transpacific rates, with carriers using blank sailings to hold prices up. That is roughly 74 per cent above where the index sat a year earlier.
The Australia lane has followed, then paused. The Shanghai to Sydney spot rate eased slightly in early October after seven consecutive weekly rises, South East Asia to Australia rates held steady, schedule reliability sits at 49.9 per cent, and port omissions, rollovers and vessel bunching mean delays into Australia remain common even on services that do sail. Australia and New Zealand spot rates retreated 3.8 per cent to US$2,833 per TEU in the first week of October. The pause did not last. ANL published rate restorations on Asia to Australia trades for 15 October and 1 November, Maersk announced a 1 November peak season surcharge on Asia to Oceania dry containers, and space from South East Asia remains restricted on some services into early November.
Capacity is not the constraint people assume. When Far East to Australia rates surged more than 30 per cent within a month in mid-2026 and lines were quoting US$2,000 per TEU, carriers responded by adding capacity to the route, while Port of Melbourne reported container trade up more than 2 per cent year on year in the first quarter and 7 per cent in April alone. The Port of Melbourne handled a record 3.5 million TEU in calendar 2025, its second record year in a row. Australian import demand is growing, and shipping lines follow demand.
What is rising relentlessly is the landside cost. DP World Australia lifted its landside charges from 1 January 2026, defending the increase as underpinning almost $1 billion of private investment in port infrastructure. Melbourne’s VICT announced a 13.8 per cent increase to its landside infrastructure surcharge, to A$161.35 per full container, while the Container Transport Alliance Australia reported chronic gate-in and capacity constraints at empty container parks in Melbourne and Sydney and shipping lines becoming more aggressive on container detention, in some cases billing importers for detention when there was nowhere to dehire the box. The ACCC’s view is that importers and exporters cannot negotiate directly with stevedores or empty container parks and can only respond by switching shipping services, which is why landside charges have risen more easily than the charges stevedores levy on shipping lines.
So the current picture is: rates high and defended by surcharges, reliability at a coin flip, capacity available but lumpy, and landside costs climbing regardless of what the ocean rate does.
Have Australia’s exports dried up, and does it matter to importers?
Here is the theory as we hear it. Export markets have changed in the last two years, China tensions have cut volumes, food and dairy producers are prioritising domestic grocery and food service over export, and so there is less cargo going back to Asia. With a weaker backhaul, carriers have less reason to serve Australia competitively, and importers pay for it. Let us take the pieces in turn.
The export decline is real, and it is in containers
The ACCC’s latest stevedoring report shows full container imports at the five largest ports have grown at an average of 2.7 per cent a year since 2015-16 against 0.9 per cent for exports, and from 2023-24 to 2024-25 full imports rose 1.4 per cent while full exports fell 2.4 per cent, with the growing imbalance creating a build-up of empty containers. At the Port of Melbourne in 2025, about 1.37 million TEU of full imports arrived against roughly 662,000 TEU of full exports, and empties made up 28 per cent of the port’s container trade. Two full boxes in, one full box out, and the difference goes home empty or sits in a park.
But China tensions are not the cause
The timing is backwards. China’s trade restrictions were progressively removed between 2023 and 2026: barley in August 2023, wine in March 2024, lobster in December 2024, and the final ChAFTA tariff elimination on dairy from 1 January 2026, with Australia exporting $188.7 billion to China in 2024-25. The channels are open. What has changed is what China wants to buy, and what Australia has to sell.
Wine is the clearest case, and it is not about politics. Australian wine exports fell 7 per cent in value to $2.30 billion and 6 per cent in volume to 598 million litres in the year to June 2026, driven by weaker demand in mainland China, the UK and the US, against a decade-long decline in global wine consumption. Wine Australia describes the Chinese wine market as one-third the size it was five years ago, with the post-tariff restocking surge now over.
Dairy is where your theory is strongest. Rabobank describes Australia’s dairy trade as slowly trading places: export volumes falling sharply and imports rising, driven by lower domestic milk production, an erosion of export competitiveness and more favourable domestic market returns changing the product mix. Dairy Australia’s mid-year outlook forecasts milk production to fall 2 per cent in 2026-27 as fuel and fertiliser prices squeeze feed, notes the Australian dollar has strengthened considerably from US$0.64 in April 2025, and expects the Middle East conflict to add caution for farmers and consumers. Processors are prioritising cheese, forecast at 175,000 tonnes of exports in 2026, while milk powder production and exports stay under pressure because there is not enough milk. Fluid milk exports, half of which went to China in 2021 and 2022, have fallen an estimated 61 per cent as China’s own production expanded. ABARES expects the value of dairy exports to fall a further 5 per cent to $3.4 billion in 2026-27 on lower volumes. A shrinking milk pool, a stronger dollar and a domestic market that pays better: processors are choosing the grocery and food service customer down the road over the powder buyer in Guangzhou, and they are right to.
Meat is mixed. Beef exports rose 16 per cent year on year in the first quarter of 2026 with shipments to China up 32 per cent, and MLA forecasts a record 1.57 million tonnes for the year. Sheep meat went the other way, down 16 per cent, with China down 24 per cent and volumes to the Middle East and North Africa down 36 per cent because the US-Iran conflict made air freight to the region limited and expensive. By July, sheep meat shipments to China were 35 per cent below the previous year and 24 per cent below the five-year average.
So the honest diagnosis is this. Containerised exports are shrinking and shifting toward higher-value, lower-volume product. The causes are China’s own demand and self-sufficiency, a global decline in wine drinking, the Middle East conflict closing the Gulf as an air and sea market, a dairy herd that keeps getting smaller, a currency that has made Australian product dearer, and landside stevedoring charges that some agricultural exporters told the ACCC had become higher than their ocean freight rates and were undermining their ability to compete internationally. Tensions with China are the one explanation the data does not support.
Does a weak backhaul make Australia a less attractive lane?
In cost terms, yes. A shipping line prices the round voyage. Australia is a headhaul import trade: the money is made bringing full boxes south. Export cargo on the way back is low-rate agricultural product, but it does something valuable. It pays for the container’s trip home. Every full export box that disappears becomes an empty that has to be stored, handled and shipped back at the line’s cost. More empties per round voyage means a higher cost base per import box, and a stronger incentive for carriers to defend import rates with surcharges and blank sailings.
In capacity terms, no. Shipping lines deploy ships where the headhaul pays, measured against the alternatives. Australia’s import demand is growing. When rates jumped in June, lines added ships. What actually pulls capacity away from Australia is other trades paying more: Drewry’s intra-Asia index hit its sixth consecutive record in early October at 212 per cent above a year earlier, and Shanghai to Los Angeles sits above US$8,000 per 40ft. Those are the lanes competing for tonnage with Australia this quarter, and in 2027 the competition reverses, as the next section explains.
Where the weak backhaul really lands is on the wharf. The empties your exporters are no longer filling are the empties clogging the parks in Melbourne and Sydney, the empties you cannot dehire inside your free time, and the detention invoices that follow. The export decline is an importer’s problem, just not in the way the theory says. It arrives as landside cost and dehire pain, not as a shortage of ships.
One more consequence to watch: service quality rather than quantity. When the backhaul thins and the import volume is still growing, the economic answer for a carrier is often fewer direct services and more transhipment through Singapore, Port Klang or Tanjung Pelepas, particularly for Adelaide, Fremantle and Tasmania. You still get capacity. You get it with a transhipment, a longer transit and another place for your box to miss its connection.
What happens from here
Forecasting container shipping is a humbling business, so treat the following as three horizons with the things that could break them, not as a promise.
Now to Chinese New Year (17 February 2027). Expect rates into Australia to be held up rather than to rise sharply. The restorations and the 1 November peak season surcharge are already in the market, and carriers will keep using blank sailings to manage space through the pre-Christmas and pre-CNY rush. Vessel bunching is worst at Port Botany and Melbourne from October to December, when both run near capacity and any weather disruption cascades, with VBS slot shortages at peak terminals and empty container parks periodically refusing redeliveries. Reliability stays near 50 per cent. Empties and detention get worse before they get better. Air freight stays firm, with global rates 27 per cent above a year ago. If your Christmas and January stock is not already booked, you are now paying spot and hoping.
2027: the market turns, and it turns in the importer’s favour. Drewry’s October outlook warns of growing overcapacity in 2027 and 2028, with fleet growth of 8.8 per cent in 2027, 12.1 per cent in 2028 and 10 per cent in 2029, contract rates expected to decline in 2027, and new deliveries alone adding about 2.3 million TEU of effective capacity next year. The end of Red Sea diversions could release a further 1.6 million TEU of effective capacity in 2027, and Drewry expects lower bunker costs to add to the competitive pressure. Sea-Intelligence reports 70 to 80 per cent of Asia to Mediterranean headhaul capacity already back through the Red Sea, with lines returning to Suez well ahead of Drewry’s projected timeline. The orderbook stands at about 16.2 million TEU, 46.5 per cent of the active fleet, the highest ratio since 2009. Xeneta’s view is that unless several adverse events coincide, the 2027 negotiation season tilts toward cargo owners. Sea-Intelligence expects cyclical overcapacity to peak in 2027 at a level comparable to the 2016 rate wars.
For Australia specifically, overcapacity arrives as cascaded tonnage. When the big east-west trades cannot absorb new ships, mid-sized vessels get pushed onto secondary trades, and Australia is the classic secondary trade. Our expectation is more capacity and lower base rates on Asia to Australia from around the second quarter of 2027, once the post-CNY lull and the first wave of 2027 deliveries overlap. Three things will not fall with the base rate: landside charges, detention, and bunker-linked surcharges while the Strait of Hormuz remains unreliable. Drewry also warns that port congestion is unlikely to improve in 2027, because disruptions can rapidly place pressure on port operations even with more ships. Expect cheaper ocean freight and no better reliability. Carriers will also keep using blank sailings to defend the lane even in a glut, so the capacity will be real but lumpy.
What could flip it. BIMCO’s September outlook puts demand growth at only 0.5 to 2.5 per cent if the Strait of Hormuz stays effectively closed, and notes that a full return to Suez routing could lower ship demand by about 10 per cent. A serious escalation in the Gulf keeps bunker costs high and absorbs ships. A renewed Red Sea closure reverses the capacity release. A strong La Niña summer or a bad typhoon season removes effective capacity for weeks at a time. Industrial action at Australian terminals, which has a long history, would do the same. And a sharp move in the Australian dollar changes the export side faster than anything above. None of these changes the direction for 2027. Any one of them changes the timing.
What importers should do now
Protect peak, then stop paying for it. Book three weeks ahead, prioritise the SKUs that make Christmas, and hold a short buffer on anything with a transhipment in its routing. Then plan to unwind those buffers after Chinese New Year rather than carrying peak-season inventory into a softer market.
Do not lock long fixed rates at 2026 levels. If you have a contract renewal in the next six months, keep the tenor short or index-link it to a published benchmark with a reset. The market is telling you, in every forecast, that your position improves through 2027. A three-year fixed-rate deal signed in November 2026 is a gift to the carrier.
Go to market in the second quarter of 2027, properly. That is when cascaded capacity, lower bunker costs and the post-CNY lull overlap. Build your lane volumes, service levels, free time and equipment needs now so you are ready to tender when the market tilts. Ask for free time and equipment guarantees, not just rates. Put more than one port of discharge in scope. Decide whether you contract directly as a beneficial cargo owner or through a forwarder, and if through a forwarder, make the carrier allocation and surcharge pass-through transparent.
Treat the landside as its own contract. Audit terminal access, infrastructure, notification and detention charges on your invoices since January. Build a dehire plan with your transport operator that uses off-peak slots and, where it exists, a second empty container park. Dispute detention where the park would not accept the box, and keep the evidence. Where you have exporters nearby, explore reusing your import empties for their export loads: it cuts your dehire cost and their equipment cost, and it is the one practical way to make Australia’s trade imbalance work for you.
Use the shift to think about ports. If your Perth or Adelaide cargo is landed in Melbourne and trucked across the country at today’s diesel prices, a direct or transhipment call into Fremantle or Adelaide may now be cheaper on a landed basis, even with a longer transit. That is a network design question, and 2027’s capacity glut is the right moment to ask it.
If you export, the flip side applies. Backhaul capacity will be cheap and available. Lock export rates in 2027 with the same discipline importers are using to stay short now, and spend your negotiating energy on the landside charges, which are the part of your cost that will not fall.
How Trace Consultants Can Help
Trace Consultants is an Australian supply chain, procurement and operations advisory firm. We work with importers, exporters and the precincts and distribution networks that depend on container flows, with senior people who have run these processes before.
Ocean and landside go-to-market. Our procurement team runs freight tenders built for a turning market: lane and volume analysis, index-linked rate structures, free time and equipment terms, port options, carrier and forwarder evaluation, and the invoice audit that recovers overcharged surcharges and detention. We time the tender to the market, not the calendar.
Container flow and distribution. Our warehousing and distribution practice designs the landside: dehire planning, empty reuse with nearby exporters, transport operator contracts, and the DC capacity to absorb peak-season arrivals without storage penalties.
Inbound planning and inventory. Through planning and operations we set peak-season buffers by SKU and route, plan the unwind after Chinese New Year, and build the lead-time variability into your replenishment rather than into a blanket safety stock.
Port and network design. Our strategy and network design work models port of discharge, transhipment versus direct call, and DC location with current freight, fuel and landside costs in the model, so the 2027 shift becomes a redesign rather than a windfall you pocket once.
Resilience that is measured. Our resilience and risk management team tests what a Hormuz escalation, a Red Sea re-closure or terminal industrial action does to your service and cost, and what to pre-arrange now.
We do this across retail, FMCG and manufacturing and the large precincts where inbound goods are the operation.
Explore our procurement services →
Where to begin
In the next two weeks, get the Christmas and January bookings confirmed and build the dehire plan with your transport operator. Pull every landside and detention charge since January into one view.
In the next month, map your contract renewal dates against the forecast. Anything renewing before June 2027 goes short or index-linked. Start the lane and service-level data build for a second-quarter tender.
In the next quarter, run the tender when the market tilts, re-cut inventory buffers after Chinese New Year, and model the port and DC options with 2027 rates and today’s diesel. Take the three results to the executive team together.
The bottom line
The market is expensive and unreliable now, and every credible forecast says it gets cheaper and no more reliable in 2027. Australia’s export decline is real, but it is a story about China’s demand, a shrinking milk pool, a stronger dollar and a Gulf market closed by war, not about tensions, and it reaches importers through empties and landside cost rather than through a shortage of ships. The businesses that come out ahead will stay short on ocean contracts, go to market in the second quarter of 2027, and fix the landside and the network, which are the parts of the cost that no capacity glut will fix for them.
If you want a plain view of where your inbound freight, landside and network exposure sits and what it is worth fixing, we are easy to talk to.
Explore our warehousing and distribution services →