Ready to turn insight into action?
We help organisations transform ideas into measurable results with strategies that work in the real world. Let’s talk about how we can solve your most complex supply chain challenges.
Asset Management: How to Design an Effective Preventative & Reactive Maintenance Program
Across Australia and New Zealand, organisations are under increasing pressure to do more with ageing assets, tighter budgets, and higher service expectations. Whether it is a hospital managing critical clinical equipment, a local council maintaining public infrastructure, a university operating large estates, or a commercial organisation reliant on plant and equipment, the same challenge applies: how do you maintain assets reliably without overspending or increasing risk?
The answer rarely sits at either extreme.
Too much preventative maintenance can inflate cost and administrative burden. Too much reactive maintenance leads to unplanned downtime, safety incidents, and asset failure. The organisations that perform best sit in the middle — supported by clear asset visibility, structured maintenance strategies, and well-defined operating models.
At the heart of this balance sits effective asset management, underpinned by accurate asset lists and maintenance programs that are designed deliberately, not inherited by default.
This article explores how organisations can design fit-for-purpose preventative and reactive maintenance programs, why asset registers matter more than most realise, and how structured asset management enables better financial, operational, and risk outcomes.
Why asset management has become a strategic issue, not just an operational one
Asset management is often viewed as a back-of-house function — something handled by facilities, engineering, or maintenance teams. In practice, it has far broader implications.
Poorly managed assets drive:
- Unplanned downtime and service disruption
- Higher safety and compliance risk
- Escalating reactive maintenance costs
- Inefficient contractor spend
- Shortened asset life and premature replacement
- Weak capital planning and budgeting decisions
Conversely, organisations with mature asset management practices are better positioned to:
- Predict and prevent failures
- Optimise maintenance spend
- Extend asset life
- Improve safety and compliance outcomes
- Make informed capital investment decisions
- Align maintenance activity to service criticality
In sectors such as healthcare, aged care, education, transport, utilities, and hospitality, asset reliability is increasingly linked to service quality and reputation, not just cost control.
Preventative vs reactive maintenance: finding the right balance
A common misconception is that preventative maintenance is always “better” than reactive maintenance. In reality, the right strategy depends on asset criticality, failure risk, usage patterns, and consequence of failure.
Preventative maintenance
Preventative maintenance involves scheduled activities designed to reduce the likelihood of asset failure. These may be time-based, usage-based, or condition-based.
It is most effective where:
- Asset failure carries high safety or service risk
- Downtime is costly or disruptive
- Regulatory compliance requires formal inspection and servicing
- Predictable wear patterns exist
However, over-application of preventative maintenance can result in:
- Unnecessary servicing
- Increased labour and contractor costs
- Administrative overload
- Maintenance activity that adds little value
Reactive maintenance
Reactive maintenance occurs when assets are repaired after failure.
It can be appropriate where:
- Asset criticality is low
- Failure has limited impact
- Repair is inexpensive and quick
- Redundancy exists
The challenge arises when reactive maintenance becomes the default approach for critical assets — often due to poor asset visibility, incomplete data, or lack of planning capability.
The goal is not to eliminate reactive maintenance, but to apply it intentionally, supported by data rather than habit.
Why asset lists are the foundation of effective maintenance programs
It is impossible to manage, maintain, or optimise assets that are not clearly defined.
Many organisations struggle with:
- Incomplete asset registers
- Inconsistent naming conventions
- Missing location data
- Unclear ownership and responsibility
- Assets grouped too broadly or inconsistently
- Systems that do not reflect what exists on site
Without a reliable asset list, maintenance programs become reactive by default. Teams are forced to respond to issues as they arise, rather than managing assets proactively.
What a fit-for-purpose asset list should include
An effective asset register should go beyond a simple list of equipment. At a minimum, it should capture:
- Asset description and classification
- Unique asset ID
- Physical location
- Asset owner or responsible role
- Manufacturer and model details
- Installation or commissioning date (where available)
- Condition and criticality rating
- Maintenance requirements and history
The level of detail should be proportionate to asset importance. Not every asset requires the same depth of information, but every critical asset should be clearly visible and traceable.
Asset criticality: not all assets deserve the same treatment
One of the most common mistakes in maintenance design is treating all assets equally.
Effective maintenance programs are built around asset criticality, which considers:
- Impact of failure on safety
- Impact of failure on service delivery
- Compliance and regulatory consequences
- Cost and time to repair
- Availability of redundancy
Criticality assessments allow organisations to:
- Prioritise maintenance effort
- Allocate preventative maintenance where it matters most
- Reduce unnecessary activity on low-risk assets
- Align maintenance spend to risk exposure
Without this lens, maintenance programs often become bloated, expensive, and poorly targeted.
Designing a preventative maintenance framework that actually works
A strong preventative maintenance framework is not simply a schedule of tasks. It is an operating model that aligns people, process, technology, and governance.
Key elements include:
1. Clear maintenance strategies by asset class
Different asset classes require different approaches. For example:
- Life-safety systems
- Mechanical and electrical plant
- Clinical or production equipment
- Building fabric and finishes
- Mobile assets
Each class should have defined maintenance strategies that reflect risk, usage, and regulatory requirements.
2. Realistic maintenance intervals
Maintenance intervals should be based on:
- Manufacturer recommendations
- Operating conditions
- Historical failure patterns
- Asset age and condition
Blindly applying generic intervals often results in either under-maintenance or unnecessary cost.
3. Defined roles and responsibilities
Maintenance programs fail when accountability is unclear. Organisations need clarity on:
- Who owns asset data
- Who approves maintenance strategies
- Who executes maintenance (internal vs external)
- Who monitors performance and outcomes
4. Practical documentation
Maintenance documentation should be:
- Clear and accessible
- Proportionate to asset risk
- Integrated with day-to-day operations
Overly complex documentation often leads to non-compliance in practice.
Designing reactive maintenance so it does not undermine performance
Reactive maintenance will always exist. The difference between high-performing organisations and struggling ones is how well reactive maintenance is controlled.
Effective reactive maintenance design includes:
- Clear triage and prioritisation processes
- Defined response time expectations
- Transparent escalation pathways
- Root cause analysis for repeat failures
- Feedback loops into preventative strategies
When reactive maintenance is tracked and analysed properly, it becomes a source of insight, not just cost.
The role of systems and data in asset management
Technology alone does not solve asset management problems, but poor systems can make good practice impossible.
Common challenges include:
- Asset data spread across spreadsheets, systems, and contractors
- CMMS or EAM systems that are poorly configured
- Low data quality undermining trust in reports
- Systems that do not align with how teams actually work
The objective should be:
- A single source of truth for asset data
- Systems configured to reflect the asset hierarchy
- Maintenance workflows that match operational reality
- Reporting that supports decision-making, not just compliance
Importantly, system design should follow process clarity, not the other way around.
Governance and assurance: keeping maintenance programs effective over time
Asset management is not a one-off exercise. Over time:
- Assets age
- Usage patterns change
- Risk profiles evolve
- Regulatory requirements shift
Effective governance ensures maintenance programs remain relevant.
This includes:
- Periodic review of asset criticality
- Regular validation of asset registers
- Performance monitoring against maintenance KPIs
- Clear decision rights for changes to maintenance strategies
Without governance, even well-designed programs gradually degrade.
Common pitfalls organisations encounter
Across Australia and New Zealand, several patterns appear consistently:
- Asset lists built once and never updated
- Maintenance strategies inherited from previous operators
- Over-reliance on contractors without internal oversight
- Systems implemented without clear data standards
- Reactive maintenance masking underlying issues
- Capital planning disconnected from asset condition data
These issues rarely stem from lack of effort. More often, they arise from lack of structure and clarity.
How Trace Consultants can help
Trace Consultants supports organisations to design and implement practical, risk-based asset management and maintenance frameworks that align with operational reality.
Our support typically includes:
- Reviewing existing asset registers and maintenance practices
- Designing fit-for-purpose asset hierarchies and asset lists
- Establishing asset criticality frameworks
- Defining preventative and reactive maintenance strategies
- Clarifying roles, responsibilities, and governance
- Supporting system configuration and data alignment
- Developing documentation that is usable, not theoretical
Our focus is on helping organisations move from reactive decision-making to structured, data-driven asset management, without over-engineering solutions or creating unnecessary administrative burden.
We work across sectors where asset reliability, safety, and cost control are critical, bringing a practical lens that balances operational needs with strategic outcomes.
Bringing it all together
Effective asset management is not about choosing preventative over reactive maintenance. It is about designing a balanced, intentional approach grounded in accurate asset data, clear priorities, and realistic operating models.
Organisations that invest in:
- Clear asset lists
- Thoughtful maintenance strategies
- Strong governance
- Practical systems
are better positioned to reduce risk, control costs, and extend asset life — while maintaining service reliability.
As asset portfolios grow more complex and budgets remain constrained, this capability will only become more important.
The question for many organisations is no longer whether they can afford to improve asset management — but whether they can afford not to.
Ready to turn insight into action?
We help organisations transform ideas into measurable results with strategies that work in the real world. Let’s talk about how we can solve your most complex supply chain challenges.






