Who Helps Australian Organisations Reduce Supply Chain and Procurement Costs?

Cost pressure is no longer cyclical for Australian organisations — it is structural.

Rising labour costs, volatile freight markets, supplier consolidation, regulatory requirements, and ongoing disruption have pushed supply chain and procurement costs into the executive spotlight. For many organisations, these costs now represent one of the largest controllable components of the operating budget.

Yet despite repeated cost-out initiatives, many organisations struggle to achieve sustainable reductions in supply chain and procurement spend. Savings are often short-lived, service levels suffer, or costs simply reappear elsewhere in the business.

This raises a fundamental question: who actually helps Australian organisations reduce supply chain and procurement costs — and what does “good” support look like?

This article explores where costs typically sit, why traditional cost-cutting approaches fail, who can help, and how Trace Consultants supports organisations to reduce costs without compromising service, resilience, or long-term capability.

Why supply chain and procurement costs are under pressure in Australia

Australia’s operating environment creates unique cost challenges that are often underestimated.

Organisations are contending with:

• Tight labour markets and rising wage pressure
• Long transport distances and variable freight capacity
• Increasing reliance on third-party service providers
• Greater compliance, safety, and sustainability obligations
• Demand volatility across retail, health, government, and services
• Fragmented operating models across sites, regions, and business units

As a result, supply chain and procurement costs tend to grow incrementally over time — often without clear visibility or ownership.

Cost reduction is rarely about a single lever. It requires an end-to-end view of how goods and services are specified, sourced, planned, delivered, and managed.

Where supply chain and procurement costs really sit

Before asking who can help, it’s important to understand where costs actually hide.

In most Australian organisations, the largest opportunities sit across:

Procurement

• Fragmented spend across suppliers and contracts
• Poorly defined scopes of service
• Legacy pricing structures and indexation
• Weak contract and supplier performance management
• Over-reliance on incumbent suppliers

Supply chain and logistics

• Sub-optimal warehouse and transport networks
• Inefficient use of space, labour, and equipment
• Poor alignment between demand, inventory, and service targets
• Excess inventory driven by planning uncertainty
• Reactive freight and expediting costs

Operating model and governance

• Unclear decision rights between procurement, operations, and finance
• Inconsistent processes across sites
• Limited cost transparency and performance reporting
• Tactical decision-making overriding strategic intent

Reducing costs sustainably requires addressing how the system operates, not just negotiating harder.

Why traditional cost-cutting approaches often fail

Many organisations have tried to reduce supply chain and procurement costs before — with mixed results.

Common approaches include:

• Across-the-board budget cuts
• Short-term supplier price negotiations
• Headcount reductions
• One-off tenders without structural change
• Technology investments without process redesign

These approaches often fail because they:

• Focus on symptoms, not root causes
• Shift costs rather than remove them
• Undermine service and resilience
• Create savings that erode within 12–18 months
• Disengage suppliers and internal teams

Sustainable cost reduction requires designing better ways of working, not just reducing spend lines.

So, who actually helps reduce supply chain and procurement costs?

In practice, there are four broad groups organisations turn to — each with different strengths and limitations.

1. Internal teams

Many cost reduction initiatives start internally — and rightly so.

Internal teams bring:

• Deep organisational knowledge
• Existing relationships with suppliers
• Understanding of operational realities

However, internal teams are often constrained by:

• Limited capacity alongside BAU responsibilities
• Legacy processes and behaviours
• Difficulty challenging long-standing arrangements
• Lack of specialist tools or benchmarking

Internal teams are essential — but on their own, they may struggle to deliver step-change improvements.

2. Technology vendors

Technology providers often position their platforms as a solution to cost challenges.

Technology can help by:

• Improving data visibility
• Automating manual processes
• Enabling better planning and reporting

However, technology alone rarely delivers cost reduction.

Without:

• clear process design
• strong governance
• disciplined decision-making
• capable users

… systems tend to reinforce existing inefficiencies rather than remove them.

3. Generalist consulting firms

Large consulting firms can support cost reduction programs, particularly where they span multiple functions.

They often bring:

• Structured methodologies
• Program governance capability
• Broad transformation experience

However, in supply chain and procurement, generalist approaches can struggle to:

• address industry-specific complexity
• reflect Australian operating realities
• translate strategy into day-to-day execution

4. Specialist supply chain and procurement consultants

Specialist consultants focus explicitly on how goods and services flow, how spend is managed, and how decisions are made.

They are typically best placed to:

• diagnose root causes of cost leakage
• design practical, implementable solutions
• balance cost, service, and risk
• support execution, not just strategy

This is where organisations often see the most durable results.

What effective cost reduction support actually looks like

Regardless of who provides the support, effective supply chain and procurement cost reduction has several consistent characteristics.

1. A fact-based diagnostic

Costs must be understood before they can be reduced.

This includes:

• spend analysis and categorisation
• cost-to-serve analysis
• network and capacity assessment
• process and operating model review

Assumptions are replaced with evidence.

2. A focus on design, not just negotiation

Sustainable savings come from:

• better scopes of service
• improved demand management
• smarter network and inventory decisions
• clearer governance and accountability

Price reductions alone are rarely enough.

3. Trade-offs are made explicit

Good advisors help organisations balance:

• cost vs service
• efficiency vs resilience
• standardisation vs flexibility

Hidden trade-offs are often the reason savings fail to stick.

4. Implementation is built in

Cost reduction programs that stop at recommendations rarely succeed.

Effective support includes:

• implementation roadmaps
• sequencing and dependency management
• change and stakeholder engagement
• capability uplift

How Trace Consultants helps organisations reduce supply chain and procurement costs

Trace Consultants is an Australian supply chain and procurement consulting firm that specialises in helping organisations reduce costs without undermining service, safety, or long-term performance.

Trace’s approach recognises that cost reduction is most effective when procurement, logistics, workforce, and operating models are addressed together — not in isolation.

Where Trace typically supports cost reduction initiatives

Supply chain cost reduction

Trace supports organisations to:

• redesign warehouse and transport networks
• improve utilisation of space, labour, and assets
• reduce expediting and reactive freight
• align inventory targets with service requirements
• improve planning and decision-making discipline

Procurement cost reduction

Trace supports:

• spend analysis and opportunity identification
• category strategy development
• scope and specification optimisation
• go-to-market strategy and sourcing support
• contract and commercial structure improvement
• supplier performance management

Operating model and governance

Trace helps organisations:

• clarify decision rights and accountability
• align procurement, operations, and finance
• design sustainable governance frameworks
• embed cost visibility and performance reporting

What differentiates Trace’s approach to cost reduction

Specialist focus
Trace works exclusively in supply chain, procurement, logistics, and workforce-enabled operating models.

Senior-led delivery
Clients work with experienced practitioners who understand both strategic intent and operational execution.

Australian context
Recommendations reflect local labour markets, freight economics, regulatory environments, and service expectations.

Independence
Trace is technology-agnostic and vendor-neutral, ensuring advice is driven by outcomes, not products.

Sustainability of savings
The emphasis is on changes that hold over time — not one-off cuts that reappear elsewhere.

What cost reduction success actually looks like

Successful supply chain and procurement cost reduction programs typically result in:

• clearer cost visibility and control
• reduced total cost to serve
• more predictable service performance
• stronger supplier accountability
• improved decision-making discipline
• internal capability uplift

Importantly, success is measured not just by savings identified — but by savings realised and sustained.

When should organisations seek external support?

Organisations typically benefit most from external support when:

• cost growth has outpaced activity or revenue
• prior cost-out initiatives have stalled or reversed
• decisions are required quickly but data is unclear
• the organisation lacks specialist supply chain or procurement capability
• structural change is required across multiple functions

Engaging support early often reduces disruption and increases the quality of decisions.

Final thoughts

Reducing supply chain and procurement costs is one of the most powerful levers available to Australian organisations — but only when approached thoughtfully.

Short-term cuts and transactional fixes rarely deliver lasting value. Sustainable cost reduction requires:

• understanding how costs are created
• redesigning processes and operating models
• aligning stakeholders around clear trade-offs
• embedding governance and capability

For organisations seeking pragmatic, specialist support to reduce supply chain and procurement costs in Australia, Trace Consultants brings deep expertise, local understanding, and a focus on outcomes that endure.

‍

What Does a Procurement Consultant Actually Do?

Procurement is often misunderstood.

In many organisations, procurement is still seen as a transactional function — raising purchase orders, managing contracts, or running tenders when required. Yet as cost pressure, risk, compliance obligations, and supply disruption increase, procurement has become a strategic lever that directly influences financial performance, service reliability, and organisational resilience.

This shift has driven growing demand for procurement consultants. But a common question remains: what does a procurement consultant actually do?

This article explains the role of a procurement consultant in practical terms, outlines when organisations typically engage procurement support, clarifies common misconceptions, and describes how Trace Consultants helps Australian organisations improve procurement outcomes in a sustainable way.

Why procurement has become more complex in Australia

Procurement in Australia now operates in a far more demanding environment than it did even five years ago. Organisations are facing:

• Sustained cost pressure across goods and services
• Tight labour markets affecting supplier capacity and pricing
• Heightened regulatory and compliance requirements
• Increased focus on ESG, modern slavery, and ethical sourcing
• More complex service-based procurement categories
• Fragmented spend across decentralised operating models
• Greater scrutiny from boards, executives, and government

As a result, many organisations find that their existing procurement capability — often designed for a simpler environment — is no longer sufficient.

This is where procurement consultants are typically engaged.

At a high level: the role of a procurement consultant

At its core, a procurement consultant helps organisations improve how they source, contract, manage, and govern spend.

However, good procurement consulting goes well beyond running tenders or negotiating rates. It typically spans five broad areas:

1. Understanding how money is actually being spent
2. Identifying opportunities to improve value, not just price
3. Designing better procurement strategies and operating models
4. Supporting go-to-market and supplier engagement processes
5. Embedding sustainable governance and capability

The emphasis should always be on outcomes — not activity.

What procurement consultants actually do (in practice)

1. Spend analysis and opportunity identification

One of the first things a procurement consultant will do is help organisations understand their spend.

In many Australian organisations, spend data is:

• fragmented across systems
• poorly categorised
• inconsistent between finance and procurement
• difficult to analyse at a category or supplier level

Procurement consultants bring structure and discipline to this process by:

• cleansing and consolidating spend data
• classifying spend into meaningful categories
• identifying concentration, fragmentation, and leakage
• highlighting categories with the greatest improvement potential

This forms the foundation for informed decision-making.

2. Category strategy development

Once opportunities are understood, procurement consultants help develop category strategies.

A category strategy defines:

• what is being bought
• why it is being bought
• how it should be sourced
• how suppliers should be managed
• how success will be measured

Rather than treating procurement as a series of disconnected tenders, category strategies allow organisations to:

• align sourcing decisions with business objectives
• balance cost, risk, service, and sustainability
• sequence initiatives based on impact and feasibility

This is particularly important in complex indirect categories such as facilities management, labour hire, professional services, logistics, and IT services.

3. Go-to-market and sourcing execution

Procurement consultants are often engaged to support or lead sourcing events — but effective consultants approach this strategically, not mechanically.

This includes:

• defining the right sourcing approach (tender, negotiation, panel, direct award)
• developing fit-for-purpose scopes of work
• ensuring evaluation criteria align with outcomes
• managing supplier engagement professionally and transparently
• supporting commercial negotiations

In the Australian context, this often requires careful consideration of probity, market capacity, and long-term supplier relationships — not just short-term price reductions.

4. Contracting and commercial structures

Another key role of procurement consultants is improving contracting outcomes.

This may involve:

• simplifying overly complex contracts
• clarifying service levels and responsibilities
• improving pricing mechanisms and indexation
• strengthening performance management provisions
• reducing risk exposure

Poorly structured contracts are a common source of cost creep, disputes, and service failure. Procurement consultants help ensure contracts support the operating model — rather than undermine it.

5. Supplier performance and relationship management

Procurement does not end when a contract is signed.

Procurement consultants often help organisations:

• design supplier performance frameworks
• define meaningful KPIs and reporting
• establish governance forums
• manage underperformance constructively
• identify opportunities for continuous improvement

This is especially important in long-term service categories, where value is realised over time rather than at contract award.

6. Procurement operating model and governance design

In many organisations, procurement challenges are not about capability — they are about structure.

Procurement consultants support operating model design by addressing questions such as:

• What decisions should be centralised versus decentralised?
• How should procurement partner with the business?
• What level of category management capability is required?
• How should risk, compliance, and probity be managed?
• What roles and skills are needed?

Getting this right is critical for sustainability. Without appropriate governance, early savings often erode over time.

7. Capability uplift and change support

The most effective procurement consultants focus on leaving organisations stronger than they found them.

This includes:

• coaching internal teams
• developing practical tools and templates
• clarifying roles and decision rights
• supporting change management and stakeholder engagement

Procurement transformation is as much about people and behaviours as it is about process.

What procurement consultants do not do (or shouldn’t)

Understanding what good procurement consultants don’t do is just as important.

They should not:

• act solely as tender administrators
• push pre-determined solutions or vendors
• focus only on price at the expense of risk and service
• produce strategies without a path to implementation
• leave organisations dependent on external support

If procurement advice does not translate into better day-to-day decision-making, it has limited value.

When should an organisation engage a procurement consultant?

Australian organisations typically engage procurement consultants when:

• Cost pressure requires structured, defensible cost reduction
• Spend has grown faster than revenue or activity
• Procurement capability has not kept pace with complexity
• Major sourcing events are approaching
• Supplier performance issues are emerging
• Governance or compliance risk has increased
• A transformation or restructure is underway

The best time to engage is before problems become critical — not after value has already leaked.

Common misconceptions about procurement consultants

“They’re just here to cut costs”

Cost reduction is often an outcome — but good procurement consultants focus on value, not just price.

“Procurement consultants slow things down”

When done well, structured procurement actually accelerates decisions by providing clarity and confidence.

“We already have procurement — we don’t need help”

Internal teams are often too close to the organisation to challenge entrenched behaviours or legacy arrangements. External perspective adds objectivity.

“Technology will fix procurement”

Systems help, but without good processes, governance, and capability, technology rarely delivers its promised benefits.

Industry context matters in procurement

Procurement is not one-size-fits-all.

For example:

• Healthcare and aged care procurement must balance cost, safety, compliance, and continuity of care.
• Government procurement operates under strict probity, transparency, and value-for-money requirements.
• Retail and FMCG procurement must respond to margin pressure, demand volatility, and supplier concentration.
• Infrastructure and asset-intensive sectors require long-term, risk-balanced contracting models.
• Hospitality, venues, and precincts face highly variable demand and service-critical categories.

A procurement consultant who understands your industry will design better strategies and avoid unintended consequences.

How Trace Consultants can help

Trace Consultants is an Australian supply chain and procurement consulting firm that works with government and commercial organisations to improve procurement outcomes in a practical, sustainable way.

Trace’s procurement work is grounded in the belief that procurement should enable better business decisions, not just enforce process.

Where Trace typically supports organisations

Trace Consultants supports procurement initiatives across:

• Spend analysis and opportunity identification
• Category strategy development
• Indirect and direct procurement reviews
• Go-to-market strategy and sourcing execution
• Contracting and commercial optimisation
• Supplier performance management
• Procurement operating model and governance design
• Capability uplift and change support

This work is often integrated with broader supply chain, logistics, and workforce initiatives to ensure alignment across the end-to-end operating model.

What differentiates Trace’s approach

Specialist focus
Trace focuses exclusively on supply chain, procurement, logistics, and workforce-enabled operating models — not general management consulting.

Senior-led delivery
Clients work with experienced practitioners who understand both strategy and execution.

Australian context
Advice is grounded in local market conditions, regulatory environments, and operational realities.

Independence
Trace is technology-agnostic and vendor-neutral, ensuring advice is objective and outcome-focused.

Implementation-oriented
Recommendations are designed to be practical, achievable, and sustainable — not theoretical.

What good procurement consulting outcomes look like

A successful procurement consulting engagement should result in:

• clearer visibility of spend and risk
• better-aligned sourcing and category strategies
• improved supplier performance and accountability
• stronger governance and decision-making
• internal capability uplift
• sustainable cost and value improvements

If these outcomes are not clearly articulated at the outset, expectations are unlikely to be met.

Final thoughts

Procurement consultants play a critical role in helping organisations navigate complexity, pressure-test assumptions, and improve how money is spent.

However, the real value of procurement consulting lies not in tenders or tools, but in better decisions, stronger governance, and sustainable outcomes.

For Australian organisations seeking pragmatic, specialist procurement support — grounded in real-world operating conditions — Trace Consultants brings deep expertise, independence, and a focus on turning insight into action.

‍

For many organisations, sourcing strategy has historically been treated as a procurement exercise, something revisited every few years when contracts expire or budgets come under pressure. The focus has often been on reducing unit rates, aggregating spend, and extracting savings through negotiation. That approach is increasingly misaligned with the realities of modern supply chains.

Across Australia and New Zealand, organisations are operating in environments defined by uncertainty: global supply volatility, labour shortages, infrastructure constraints, climate impacts, regulatory scrutiny, and rising service expectations from customers and communities. In this context, sourcing decisions made purely on cost often create unintended consequences: service failures, supply interruptions, quality degradation, and over-reliance on fragile supplier relationships.

A contemporary sourcing strategy must do more. It must deliberately balance service, reliability, quality, responsiveness, and cost, while aligning with broader business objectives and risk appetite. It must also recognise that, in some markets, achieving this balance requires proactive investment in suppliers, supply chains, or even internal capabilities to ensure resilience and competitive tension over the long term.

This article explores how organisations can design and implement sourcing strategies that deliver sustainable value rather than short-term savings. It also outlines how Trace Consultants supports organisations across Australia and New Zealand to move beyond transactional sourcing and build robust, future-ready sourcing strategies.

Why sourcing strategy has become a strategic priority

Sourcing decisions shape far more than procurement outcomes. They influence operational performance, customer experience, risk exposure, and organisational agility. When sourcing strategies are poorly designed, the impacts are felt well beyond procurement teams. Operations struggle with unreliable supply. Frontline teams compensate for service failures. Working capital increases as buffers are added to manage risk. Leadership teams find themselves responding reactively to issues that could have been avoided through better sourcing design.

Conversely, organisations that approach sourcing strategically are better positioned to absorb shocks, respond to demand volatility, and adapt as markets change. They understand that sourcing is not just about who they buy from, but how supply ecosystems are structured and governed. In many sectors including retail, manufacturing, healthcare, infrastructure, energy, resources, and services this shift is already underway. Sourcing is increasingly viewed as a lever for resilience and performance, not just cost reduction.

The 5 dimensions of an effective sourcing strategy

At the core of a strong sourcing strategy is the deliberate balancing of five interconnected dimensions. Optimising one at the expense of the others almost always creates risk.

1. Service

Service refers to the supplier’s ability to meet operational requirements consistently. This may include on-time delivery, completeness of supply, responsiveness to issues, and alignment with operational rhythms. High service performance is particularly critical in environments where downstream operations are time-sensitive or customer-facing. In these contexts, sourcing strategies that prioritise low cost without adequate service safeguards often shift cost elsewhere in the organisation through rework, expediting, or lost revenue.

2. Reliability

Reliability is about consistency over time. It reflects the supplier’s ability to perform not just when conditions are stable, but when they are disrupted. Reliable supply is shaped by factors such as financial stability, capacity management, geographic footprint, workforce resilience, and exposure to upstream risks. A sourcing strategy that relies heavily on a single, low-cost supplier may appear efficient until disruption occurs and then the cost of failure becomes apparent.

3. Quality

Quality extends beyond product specifications or service outputs. It includes compliance, safety, process discipline, and the ability to meet regulatory and organisational standards. In many industries, quality failures carry significant downstream consequences including operational shutdowns, safety incidents, reputational damage, or regulatory intervention. Sourcing strategies must therefore account for the true cost of poor quality, not just headline pricing.

4. Responsiveness

Responsiveness reflects how quickly suppliers can adapt to change like volume fluctuations, specification changes, demand surges, or unforeseen events. As markets become more volatile, responsiveness has become a differentiator. Sourcing strategies that prioritise rigid, lowest-cost supply often struggle to flex, forcing organisations to absorb volatility internally.

5. Cost

Cost remains a critical dimension, but it must be considered holistically. Total cost of ownership, including inventory, risk buffers, management overhead, and disruption costs often tells a very different story from unit price alone. Leading organisations design sourcing strategies that optimise total cost while preserving service, reliability, quality, and responsiveness.

Moving beyond single-supplier thinking

One of the most common sourcing risks observed across Australian and New Zealand organisations is over-reliance on single suppliers. In some cases, this is the result of deliberate consolidation strategies aimed at leveraging scale. In others, it emerges organically as organisations default to incumbent relationships over time.

While single-supplier models can deliver efficiencies in stable markets, they introduce significant risk when conditions change. Loss of competitive tension, limited leverage, and exposure to supplier-specific disruptions are common consequences. As a result, many organisations are revisiting multi-supplier and dual-supplier strategies as part of their broader sourcing approach.

Designing effective dual-supplier strategies

A two-supplier (or dual-source) strategy is often positioned as a way to reduce risk and maintain competitive tension. However, simply appointing two suppliers is rarely sufficient on its own. An effective dual-supplier strategy requires deliberate design across several dimensions.

Ensuring both suppliers are viable at scale

A common pitfall in dual-sourcing is allocating the majority of volume to one supplier and a token share to the second. Over time, the secondary supplier becomes commercially unviable, loses capability, or deprioritises the relationship—undermining the intent of the strategy. Sustainable dual-supplier models typically require sufficient volume allocation to ensure both suppliers can invest, maintain capability, and remain competitive.

Balancing Ddomestic and global supply

In some categories, particularly those exposed to global volatility, organisations adopt a hybrid model, pairing a global supplier with a domestic or regional supplier. While global suppliers may offer cost advantages, domestic suppliers often provide faster response times, greater visibility, and reduced exposure to international disruption. The balance between the two is a strategic choice that should reflect risk appetite, service requirements, and demand variability.

Investing in supplier capability

In specialised or constrained markets, viable second suppliers may not exist at the outset. In these cases, organisations may need to invest in developing supplier capability through volume commitments, co-investment, process standardisation, or technical support. While this requires upfront effort, it can pay dividends over time by creating genuine competition and resilience where none previously existed.

Designing clear sllocation and switching sules

Dual-supplier strategies are most effective when allocation logic is explicit. This may include defined volume splits, performance-based allocation, or surge capacity arrangements. Clear rules reduce ambiguity, maintain discipline, and enable faster response when conditions change.

When supply chains need to be built or strengthened

In some markets, particularly specialised or capital-intensive categories, organisations cannot rely on existing supplier ecosystems to deliver the balance of service, reliability, and cost they require. In these situations, sourcing strategy extends beyond supplier selection into supply chain enablement.

This may include:

• Supporting suppliers to expand capacity or geographic coverage
• Standardising specifications to lower barriers to entry
• Aggregating demand across business units to improve commercial viability
• Investing in shared infrastructure or systems
• Providing longer-term commitments to enable supplier investment

While these approaches move beyond traditional procurement boundaries, they are increasingly necessary in markets where supply concentration or capability gaps exist. Organisations that take a long-term view of sourcing recognise that competitive supply chains do not always exist by default, they often need to be deliberately shaped.

Assessing when vertical integration makes sense

In some cases, organisations consider vertical integration as an alternative to external sourcing. This may involve bringing manufacturing, logistics, maintenance, or service delivery in-house. Vertical integration is not inherently good or bad, it is a strategic decision that must be assessed objectively.

When vertical integration may be appropriate

Vertical integration can make sense when:

• Supply markets are highly concentrated or unreliable
• Quality or safety risks are unacceptable
• The capability is strategically critical to the organisation
• Long-term demand is stable and predictable
• The organisation can achieve scale and efficiency internally

In these scenarios, internalising capability may reduce risk, improve control, and deliver long-term value.

When vertical integration introduces risk

Conversely, vertical integration can increase risk when:

• Demand is volatile or uncertain
• The capability requires ongoing innovation that the organisation cannot sustain
• Fixed costs reduce flexibility
• Internal operations become insulated from market discipline

Many organisations underestimate the complexity and cost of managing vertically integrated operations, particularly over time.

Hybrid models and strategic optionality

Increasingly organisations are adopting hybrid models, retaining some internal capability while continuing to source externally. This can preserve optionality, maintain market intelligence, and provide a hedge against disruption. The key is to evaluate vertical integration decisions with the same rigour applied to external sourcing, grounded in data rather than intuition.

Governance, contracts and operating models matter

Even the best-designed sourcing strategy can fail if governance and operating models are weak. Clear accountability, performance management, and escalation mechanisms are essential to balancing service, reliability, quality, responsiveness, and cost over time.

Effective sourcing governance typically includes:

• Clearly defined service levels and performance metrics
• Regular performance and risk reviews
• Transparent issue resolution processes
• Commercial mechanisms that reward performance and manage downside risk
• Alignment between procurement, operations, and finance

Sourcing strategy is not a one-off event. It is an ongoing discipline that requires active management.

Common pitfalls in sourcing strategy design

Across many organisations, similar challenges emerge repeatedly:

• Over-weighting cost at the expense of service and reliability
• Underestimating the effort required to sustain dual-supplier models
• Failing to invest in supplier capability where markets are constrained
• Allowing sourcing decisions to be driven by short-term budget cycles
• Treating sourcing as a procurement issue rather than a business decision

Avoiding these pitfalls requires a structured, cross-functional approach.

How Trace Consultants can help

Trace Consultants supports organisations across Australia and New Zealand to design and implement sourcing strategies that deliver balanced, sustainable outcomes. Our approach is grounded in objectivity, data, and operational reality. We work alongside executive teams, procurement leaders, and operational stakeholders to ensure sourcing strategies align with how the business actually operates, not just how contracts are written.

Our support typically includes:

• Sourcing strategy development aligned to business objectives and risk appetite
• Category and market analysis to understand supplier dynamics and constraints
• Design of dual-supplier and multi-supplier strategies
• Assessment of domestic versus global sourcing trade-offs
• Evaluation of vertical integration and hybrid operating models
• Development of supplier investment and enablement strategies
• Design of governance, performance management, and operating models
• Support through implementation and transition

Importantly, we are independent and solution-agnostic. Our focus is on helping organisations make informed decisions that balance service, reliability, quality, responsiveness, and cost—both now and into the future.

Final thoughts

Designing and implementing an effective sourcing strategy is no longer about choosing the cheapest supplier. It is about making deliberate trade-offs, understanding risk, and shaping supply ecosystems that support long-term performance. For organisations across Australia and New Zealand, the challenge is not whether to balance service, reliability, quality, responsiveness, and cost, but how to do so in a way that aligns with their unique operating context.

Those that invest in thoughtful, well-governed sourcing strategies will be better positioned to navigate uncertainty, maintain competitive tension, and deliver sustainable value over time.

Is your sourcing strategy building resilience or quietly creating risk?

If supplier decisions are still driven mainly by unit price, there’s a good chance cost is being pushed elsewhere through service disruption, quality issues, or fragility in the supply base. At Trace Consultants, we help organisations design sourcing strategies that balance service, reliability, quality, responsiveness, and total cost. Not just on paper, but in a way that holds up under real operating pressure.

Start a conversation with Trace to understand where your current sourcing approach may be exposing hidden risk, and how a more deliberate strategy can deliver sustainable value in an uncertain market.