Rostering Optimisation in Service Industries

Across Australia and New Zealand, service-based organisations are facing a perfect storm of rising costs, workforce shortages, increasing demand volatility, and heightened expectations from customers, patients, and regulators.

In many industries, labour is the single largest cost line — and the most difficult to manage. Yet despite this, rostering processes in many organisations remain manual, reactive, and disconnected from demand.

Rostering optimisation has therefore moved from being an operational “nice to have” to a strategic necessity. Organisations that can align labour supply with real demand, while maintaining service quality and workforce wellbeing, are gaining a significant advantage in an increasingly constrained operating environment.

This article explores how rostering optimisation is changing across service industries, why traditional approaches are falling short, and how organisations can build more sustainable, cost-effective rostering models.

Why Rostering Has Become a Strategic Issue

Historically, rostering was often treated as an administrative task. Line managers or supervisors created rosters based on experience, availability, and rules of thumb. While imperfect, this approach was often “good enough” when labour markets were loose and demand patterns were relatively stable.

That context has fundamentally changed.

Today, service organisations are dealing with:

• Chronic labour shortages
• Higher employee turnover
• Increased reliance on casual, agency, or contingent labour
• More complex industrial agreements and compliance requirements
• Fluctuating and unpredictable demand
• Increased scrutiny of service outcomes and safety

As a result, poorly optimised rosters now have direct and visible consequences — from escalating overtime and agency costs to missed service levels and staff burnout.

Rostering is no longer just about filling shifts. It is about balancing cost, service quality, risk, and workforce sustainability in real time.

The True Cost of Poor Rostering

Many organisations underestimate the true cost of ineffective rostering because the impacts are spread across multiple parts of the business.

Common consequences include:

• Excess overtime driven by poor shift design
• High use of agency staff to cover avoidable gaps
• Underutilisation of permanent employees
• Fatigue-related safety incidents
• Declining service reliability
• Increased absenteeism and turnover
• Reduced employee engagement

Individually, these issues may appear manageable. Collectively, they can materially erode margins, service outcomes, and organisational resilience.

In industries where margins are already under pressure — such as healthcare, aged care, disability services, hospitality, logistics, and facilities management — the cumulative impact of poor rostering can be substantial.

Demand Volatility Is Exposing Rostering Weaknesses

One of the biggest drivers of rostering inefficiency is the growing mismatch between labour supply and demand.

Demand in service industries is increasingly:

• Time-specific rather than evenly distributed
• Location-dependent
• Sensitive to external factors such as seasonality, events, weather, or funding models
• Subject to last-minute changes

Yet many rostering models still assume relatively static demand profiles. Shifts are fixed, headcounts are standardised, and flexibility is limited.

This disconnect leads to:

• Overstaffing during low-demand periods
• Understaffing during peaks
• Reactive schedule changes that frustrate staff
• Costly last-minute labour decisions

Rostering optimisation begins with acknowledging that demand is dynamic — and designing workforce models that can respond accordingly.

From Coverage-Based to Demand-Led Rostering

A significant shift occurring across service industries is the move away from coverage-based rostering towards demand-led rostering.

Coverage-based rostering focuses on ensuring a certain number of staff are present at all times, regardless of actual demand. While simple to administer, it often results in inefficiency.

Demand-led rostering, by contrast, aligns workforce supply to:

• Forecast service volumes
• Workload intensity by time and location
• Skill requirements
• Service standards

This approach requires better data, improved forecasting, and closer integration between operational planning and rostering.

The result is a roster that is:

• More efficient
• More responsive
• Better aligned with service outcomes
• More defensible from a cost and compliance perspective

Workforce Mix Is Central to Optimisation

Rostering optimisation is not just about when people work — it is also about who works.

Many service organisations are reassessing their workforce mix to improve flexibility and cost control. This includes reviewing the balance between:

• Full-time and part-time employees
• Casual and contingent labour
• Permanent staff and agency resources
• Skill levels and role design

Over-reliance on agency labour is often a symptom of deeper structural issues, such as:

• Poor demand forecasting
• Inflexible employment models
• Inefficient shift design
• Limited cross-skilling

Optimised rostering considers workforce composition as a strategic lever, not just an operational constraint.

Compliance and Fatigue Are Increasingly Critical

As industrial relations frameworks evolve and safety expectations rise, compliance and fatigue management have become central to rostering decisions.

Poorly designed rosters can expose organisations to:

• Breaches of enterprise agreements or awards
• Excessive consecutive shifts
• Inadequate rest periods
• Elevated fatigue and safety risks

Rostering optimisation must therefore balance efficiency with compliance and wellbeing. This requires:

• Clear rule frameworks
• Transparent decision logic
• Strong governance and escalation processes

Optimised rosters should reduce risk, not simply reduce cost.

Technology Is an Enabler — Not a Silver Bullet

Many organisations have invested in rostering and workforce management systems, yet continue to struggle with outcomes. This is often because technology has been implemented without rethinking underlying processes and decision frameworks.

Effective rostering optimisation requires:

• Clear demand inputs
• Defined workforce rules and constraints
• Agreed service standards
• Strong exception management

Technology can automate and optimise decisions, but only when the inputs and governance are sound.

Increasingly, organisations are also using low-code and analytics tools to:

• Improve visibility of labour demand and supply
• Identify cost drivers and inefficiencies
• Enable faster scenario analysis
• Support managers with better decision insights

The most successful implementations focus on usability and adoption, rather than system complexity.

Change Management Is Often the Missing Link

Rostering changes directly affect people’s lives. Shift patterns, start times, weekends, and overtime opportunities are deeply personal issues for staff.

As a result, even technically sound rostering initiatives can fail without effective change management.

Common challenges include:

• Resistance from frontline managers
• Perceived loss of autonomy
• Concerns about income stability
• Mistrust of “optimisation” initiatives

Successful rostering optimisation programs invest in:

• Early stakeholder engagement
• Transparent communication
• Clear articulation of benefits
• Incremental implementation
• Ongoing feedback loops

Sustainable change requires trust as much as technology.

Industry-Specific Considerations

While the principles of rostering optimisation are consistent, their application varies by industry.

In healthcare and aged care, rostering must balance clinical safety, continuity of care, and regulatory compliance.

In disability services, variability in client needs and funding models adds complexity to scheduling and workforce deployment.

In hospitality and tourism, demand volatility and seasonality require high levels of flexibility and rapid re-planning.

In facilities management and service contracting, rostering must align tightly with service level agreements and contract margins.

A one-size-fits-all approach rarely works. Rostering optimisation must be tailored to the operational reality of each industry.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

Trace Consultants works with service organisations across Australia and New Zealand to design and implement practical, sustainable rostering optimisation solutions.

Support typically includes:

Rostering and Workforce Diagnostic Reviews

Assessing current rostering practices, workforce mix, demand patterns, and cost drivers to identify root causes of inefficiency.

Demand and Capacity Modelling

Helping organisations understand true labour demand by time, location, and skill — providing a robust foundation for roster design.

Rostering Framework and Process Design

Designing clear, demand-led rostering frameworks that balance efficiency, service quality, compliance, and workforce wellbeing.

Workforce Mix and Role Design

Supporting decisions around employment models, skill mix, and role standardisation to improve flexibility and reduce reliance on high-cost labour.

Technology Enablement

Assisting with the selection, configuration, and adoption of rostering and workforce management tools — including low-code solutions where appropriate.

Change and Implementation Support

Ensuring rostering improvements are embedded through strong governance, capability uplift, and stakeholder engagement.

Trace Consultants brings an independent, operationally grounded perspective, helping organisations move beyond short-term fixes towards lasting improvement.

What Leaders Should Focus On Now

For leaders in service industries, rostering optimisation should be approached as a strategic program rather than a tactical exercise.

Key priorities include:

• Linking rostering to demand, not just coverage
• Improving workforce flexibility without increasing risk
• Using data to inform decisions rather than intuition alone
• Investing in capability, not just systems
• Engaging the workforce early and transparently

In a constrained labour market, the organisations that succeed will be those that use their workforce intelligently and sustainably.

Final Thoughts

Rostering optimisation is no longer about squeezing more hours from fewer people. It is about designing systems that respect the realities of modern service delivery — balancing cost, service quality, compliance, and workforce wellbeing.

As pressures on service industries continue to intensify across Australia and New Zealand, the ability to roster effectively will increasingly separate resilient organisations from those that struggle to keep up.

The question facing leaders is not whether rostering can be improved — but whether they are prepared to treat it as the strategic capability it has become.

‍

Workforce Planning, Rostering and Scheduling in Emergency Services

Emergency services organisations sit at the sharp end of public service delivery. Ambulance, fire and police agencies operate 24/7, respond to unpredictable demand, and carry an unwavering obligation to protect community safety. When workforce planning, rostering and scheduling are effective, these organisations are ready to respond when it matters most. When they are not, the consequences are felt immediately — by frontline staff, by leadership teams, and by the public.

Across Australia and New Zealand, emergency services are under increasing pressure. Demand for services continues to rise, incidents are becoming more complex, workforce availability is tightening, and community expectations are higher than ever. At the same time, agencies must manage fatigue risk, comply with industrial agreements, and remain financially sustainable in a constrained funding environment.

In this context, workforce planning, rostering and scheduling are no longer back-office functions. They are strategic capabilities that directly influence operational readiness, response times, workforce wellbeing and public trust.

This article explores the unique workforce challenges facing emergency services, why traditional approaches are struggling to keep pace, what effective workforce management looks like in this environment, and how organisations can take a more structured, sustainable approach. It also outlines how Trace Consultants can help emergency services agencies strengthen capability while respecting the realities of frontline operations.

Why Workforce Management Is Critical in Emergency Services

Few sectors face the same combination of operational uncertainty, public scrutiny and workforce risk as emergency services.

Unpredictable and Volatile Demand

Unlike scheduled services, emergency demand fluctuates by time of day, day of week, season, weather, major events and unforeseen incidents. Peaks can be sudden and extreme, leaving little margin for error in workforce availability.

24/7 Readiness Requirements

Emergency services must maintain readiness at all times, regardless of demand variability. This requires sufficient staffing, appropriate skill mix, and fatigue-managed coverage — even when utilisation fluctuates.

Workforce Fatigue and Wellbeing Risk

Extended shifts, night work, overtime, and exposure to traumatic incidents place significant strain on emergency service personnel. Poor rostering and reactive scheduling compound these risks, contributing to burnout, injury and attrition.

Increasing Cost Pressure

Workforce costs make up the majority of operating expenditure for emergency services. Overtime, penalty rates and contingent labour can escalate quickly when base rosters are misaligned to demand.

Compliance and Industrial Complexity

Emergency services operate under complex industrial agreements, fatigue management rules, minimum crewing requirements and safety obligations. Manual processes struggle to consistently manage this complexity at scale.

Understanding Workforce Planning, Rostering and Scheduling in an Emergency Context

Although often grouped together, workforce planning, rostering and scheduling serve different purposes — and all three must be integrated to be effective.

Workforce Planning: Building Readiness into the System

Workforce planning determines what workforce is required to meet service objectives. In emergency services, this means translating demand, response standards and risk appetite into staffing requirements by role, location and time.

Effective workforce planning considers:

• Incident demand patterns and variability
• Target response times and coverage standards
• Skill and qualification requirements
• Fatigue management constraints
• Leave, training and non-operational time
• Long-term workforce supply and attrition risk

Without robust workforce planning, rosters are built on historical patterns rather than future needs.

Rostering: Structuring Coverage

Rostering allocates personnel to shifts over weeks or months. In emergency services, rosters must balance readiness, fairness, compliance, and workforce sustainability.

Key rostering considerations include:

• Shift structures and rotation patterns
• Minimum crewing and skill mix requirements
• Fatigue and recovery rules
• Equity across personnel
• Predictability and stability of rosters

Well-designed rosters reduce the need for constant adjustment during execution.

Scheduling: Managing the Day-to-Day Reality

Scheduling deals with real-time deployment — responding to absences, incidents, surges in demand and operational disruptions.

Strong scheduling capability allows organisations to:

• Redeploy resources quickly
• Maintain coverage without excessive overtime
• Reduce reliance on ad hoc solutions
• Protect workforce wellbeing under pressure

In emergency services, scheduling is often where good planning either holds together — or unravels.

Common Workforce Challenges Across Ambulance, Fire and Police Services

While each service has its own operating model, many workforce challenges are shared.

Reactive Workforce Management

Many agencies operate in a constant cycle of responding to yesterday’s problems. Rosters are adjusted at short notice, overtime is used to fill gaps, and long-term planning takes a back seat to immediate operational pressure.

Misalignment Between Demand and Coverage

Historical shift patterns may no longer align with when demand actually occurs. This leads to periods of overstaffing and understaffing — often within the same day.

Heavy Reliance on Overtime

When base rosters do not reflect demand, overtime becomes the default solution. Over time, this inflates costs, increases fatigue risk and undermines workforce sustainability.

Limited Visibility of True Workforce Cost and Risk

Many organisations struggle to clearly understand:

• The true cost of providing coverage by location and time
• How much demand is met through reactive measures
• Where fatigue and compliance risks are concentrated
• Which stations or units are most vulnerable to disruption

Fragmented Data and Systems

Workforce data is often spread across rostering tools, payroll systems, HR platforms and operational reporting. This fragmentation limits insight and slows decision-making.

Why Traditional Approaches Are Struggling

Historically, emergency services have relied on experience, local knowledge and manual processes to manage workforce complexity. While these approaches worked in more stable environments, they are increasingly strained.

Demand volatility, workforce shortages, compliance complexity and public scrutiny have increased to the point where manual approaches struggle to keep pace. More importantly, traditional methods often optimise for fairness or familiarity rather than readiness and sustainability.

To move forward, agencies need to treat workforce planning, rostering and scheduling as an integrated system — not a set of disconnected activities.

Designing Workforce Models Around Risk and Demand

At the core of effective workforce management in emergency services is a risk-based, demand-driven approach.

Understanding Demand Patterns

Demand analysis should go beyond headline volumes to understand:

• Time-of-day and day-of-week patterns
• Seasonal and weather-driven variation
• Incident types and complexity
• Geographic differences in demand

This allows organisations to align coverage more precisely to when and where it is needed.

Embedding Readiness into Workforce Design

Workforce planning must explicitly consider readiness — not just utilisation. This includes:

• Surge capacity for major incidents
• Redundancy for critical skills
• Fatigue-managed buffers
• Flexibility to redeploy resources

Readiness should be designed into the system, not created through last-minute intervention.

Building Sustainable Rosters

Good rosters in emergency services balance competing priorities. They must deliver coverage and readiness while also being fair, predictable and sustainable for the workforce.

Key principles include:

• Aligning shift structures to demand patterns
• Managing fatigue proactively through design, not enforcement
• Reducing excessive reliance on overtime
• Providing transparency and consistency
• Supporting workforce wellbeing and retention

Importantly, sustainable rosters reduce operational risk over time, even if they require change in the short term.

Scheduling for Operational Reality

No roster survives first contact with reality. Absences, unexpected incidents and surges are inevitable.

Strong scheduling capability enables agencies to:

• Respond quickly without defaulting to overtime
• Make informed trade-offs under pressure
• Maintain compliance and safety
• Protect workforce wellbeing during high-demand periods

Scheduling is not just about filling gaps — it is about managing risk dynamically.

The Role of Technology in Emergency Services Workforce Management

Technology plays a critical role in enabling better workforce decisions, but only when aligned to the operating model.

What Technology Should Enable

Effective workforce technology should:

• Support demand-driven workforce planning
• Enable compliant, optimised rostering
• Provide real-time visibility of workforce availability
• Support rapid, informed scheduling decisions
• Improve transparency of cost, risk and performance

The goal is not automation for its own sake, but better decision-making at every level.

Why Technology Alone Is Not the Answer

Many agencies have invested in workforce systems without realising expected benefits. Common reasons include:

• Poor demand modelling
• Inconsistent data quality
• Overly complex configurations
• Limited change management
• Misalignment with operational reality

Technology amplifies the strengths — and weaknesses — of the underlying operating model.

How to Select the Right Technology

Selecting the right workforce planning, rostering and scheduling technology requires clarity on the future-state operating model before assessing systems. Emergency services organisations should start by defining service standards, readiness expectations, decision rights and compliance requirements. The right technology is one that integrates with existing HR and payroll systems, supports both long-term planning and real-time operations, and is usable under operational pressure. Ease of use for planners, schedulers and frontline leaders is critical, as overly complex systems often lead to workarounds. Just as importantly, organisations should consider scalability, configuration effort, data requirements and the governance needed to keep the system effective as demand, agreements and workforce conditions change.

Measuring What Matters

To sustain improvement, organisations need clear, meaningful metrics. These may include:

• Coverage and readiness measures
• Overtime and premium labour usage
• Fatigue risk indicators
• Workforce utilisation
• Rostering stability
• Absenteeism and turnover
• Cost per hour of coverage

Metrics should support learning and decision-making, not simply compliance reporting.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

Trace Consultants works with emergency services organisations across Australia and New Zealand to strengthen workforce planning, rostering and scheduling capability in a way that respects operational reality and workforce culture.

Trace supports agencies to:

• Understand demand and risk drivers
• Design workforce models aligned to readiness objectives
• Improve workforce planning and forecasting
• Redesign rostering and scheduling processes
• Support technology selection and implementation
• Improve performance visibility and governance
• Reduce reliance on reactive workforce measures
• Build internal capability and confidence

Trace brings experience across complex, high-reliability operating environments and takes an independent, practical approach focused on outcomes rather than theory or tools.

Looking Ahead: Workforce Management as a Readiness Capability

The challenges facing emergency services are not temporary. Demand, complexity and workforce pressure are likely to continue increasing.

Agencies that invest in robust workforce planning, rostering and scheduling will be better positioned to:

• Maintain operational readiness
• Protect workforce wellbeing
• Control costs sustainably
• Build public confidence and trust

Those that rely on reactive solutions will continue to carry higher risk — both operational and human.

Workforce management is not just about filling shifts. In emergency services, it is about ensuring the right people are ready, in the right place, at the right time — safely and sustainably.

‍

Workforce Planning, Rostering & Scheduling in Health and Aged Care

Across Australia and New Zealand, health and aged care providers are facing a perfect storm. Demand for services continues to grow, patient and client acuity is increasing, workforce availability is tightening, and cost pressures show no sign of easing. At the centre of this challenge sits one critical capability: workforce planning, rostering and scheduling.

For many organisations, workforce management remains heavily manual, reactive and fragmented. Rosters are built week-to-week under pressure. Shortages are filled with overtime or agency labour. Service reliability depends on heroic effort from frontline staff and managers. While these approaches may keep services running in the short term, they are not sustainable.

Done well, workforce planning, rostering and scheduling can transform how health and aged care services operate. They can improve continuity of care, reduce workforce fatigue, lower costs, and create a more resilient operating model. Done poorly, they drive burnout, inefficiency, compliance risk and compromised care outcomes.

This article explores why workforce planning, rostering and scheduling are so challenging in health and aged care, what “good” really looks like, and how organisations across Australia and New Zealand can take a more structured, sustainable approach. It also outlines how Trace Consultants can help organisations lift capability in this critical area.

Why Workforce Management Is a Strategic Issue in Health and Aged Care

Workforce cost is the single largest cost line for most health and aged care organisations. In many cases, it represents 60–80 per cent of the total operating cost base. Yet despite its importance, workforce planning and scheduling is often treated as an administrative function rather than a strategic capability.

Several factors have elevated workforce management to an executive-level issue.

Growing and Changing Demand

Australia and New Zealand are experiencing ageing populations, increasing chronic disease, and rising demand for both acute and community-based care. Demand is not only increasing in volume but changing in shape — more complex needs, higher acuity, and greater variability day-to-day.

Persistent Workforce Shortages

Across nursing, allied health, care workers and support roles, labour markets remain tight. Recruitment pipelines are constrained, and competition for skilled staff is intense. Reliance on agency labour has increased, often at a significant cost premium.

Increasing Regulatory and Compliance Pressure

Health and aged care providers must comply with minimum staffing requirements, skill mix rules, fatigue management, award conditions and accreditation standards. Manual rostering processes struggle to consistently manage this complexity.

Rising Expectations of Quality and Continuity

Patients, residents, clients and families increasingly expect consistent care, familiar carers, and reliable service delivery. Poor rostering and high turnover undermine these expectations.

Workforce Burnout and Retention Risk

Inefficient rostering, excessive overtime, and poor shift allocation contribute directly to burnout and attrition — further worsening workforce shortages.

Understanding Workforce Planning, Rostering and Scheduling

Although often grouped together, workforce planning, rostering and scheduling are distinct — and all three must work together.

Workforce Planning

Workforce planning is about determining what workforce is required, by role, skill, location and time, to deliver the desired level of service. In health and aged care, this means translating demand for care into workforce requirements.

This includes:

• Understanding demand drivers (patients, residents, clients, acuity)
• Defining care models and service standards
• Determining required staffing levels and skill mix
• Planning workforce supply over the short, medium and long term

Without effective workforce planning, rostering becomes guesswork.

Rostering

Rostering is the process of allocating staff to shifts over a defined period, typically weeks or months. Good rostering balances service requirements, workforce availability, award conditions, employee preferences and cost.

In health and aged care, rostering must account for:

• Shift coverage requirements
• Skill and qualification constraints
• Fatigue rules and safe working limits
• Fairness and equity across staff
• Leave, training and non-productive time

Scheduling

Scheduling focuses on the day-to-day and intra-day deployment of staff — responding to unplanned absences, demand variability, and service disruptions. In community and home-based care, scheduling also includes route planning and travel optimisation.

Scheduling capability is critical for maintaining service reliability without excessive overtime or agency use.

How to Select the Right Technology

Selecting the right workforce planning, rostering and scheduling technology requires far more than comparing feature lists or responding to vendor demonstrations. Health and aged care organisations should start by clearly defining their future-state operating model — including care models, workforce structure, decision rights and performance expectations — before assessing technology options. The most effective solutions are those that align closely with how services are delivered on the ground, integrate cleanly with payroll, HR and finance systems, and support both forward planning and real-time operational decision-making. Ease of use for frontline managers is critical, as overly complex systems often drive workarounds and undermine adoption. Just as importantly, organisations should assess data quality requirements, implementation effort, scalability, and the level of ongoing configuration and governance required to keep the system fit for purpose as demand, regulations and workforce conditions evolve. Choosing the right technology is ultimately about enabling better decisions and sustainable workforce practices, not simply automating existing problems.

Common Challenges in Health and Aged Care Workforce Management

Across hospitals, aged care providers, community services and disability organisations, similar challenges consistently emerge.

Reactive, Short-term Focus

Many organisations operate in perpetual “firefighting” mode. Rosters are built to get through the next week rather than aligned to forecast demand or longer-term workforce plans.

Limited Demand Visibility

Demand for care is often poorly quantified or not translated into workforce terms. Historical rosters, rather than actual care demand, become the basis for future planning.

Fragmented Processes and Systems

Workforce planning, rostering, payroll, HR and operational reporting are often disconnected. This creates duplication, manual workarounds and inconsistent data.

Over-reliance on Overtime and Agency Labour

When base rosters do not match demand, organisations rely on expensive short-term fixes. Over time, this inflates costs and accelerates burnout.

Poor Skill Mix Alignment

Rosters may meet headcount requirements but fail to align skills and experience with patient or resident needs — affecting quality and safety.

Lack of Performance Visibility

Many organisations struggle to answer basic questions:

• What is our true cost per hour of care?
• Where are we over- or under-staffed?
• How much of our workforce cost is reactive?
• Which services are most vulnerable to disruption?

Why Traditional Approaches No Longer Work

Historically, workforce management in health and aged care relied on experienced managers using spreadsheets, local knowledge and manual adjustments. While this approach worked in simpler environments, it is increasingly unsustainable.

The scale and complexity of modern service delivery — combined with workforce constraints and regulatory requirements — exceed what manual processes can reliably manage. More importantly, traditional approaches are not designed to optimise outcomes; they are designed to cope.

To move beyond coping, organisations must rethink workforce planning, rostering and scheduling as an integrated operating model capability.

Designing Workforce Models Around Care Demand

At the heart of effective workforce management is a simple principle: start with demand.

Translating Demand into Workforce Requirements

Demand in health and aged care may be driven by:

• Occupancy and acuity in residential settings
• Patient flows in hospitals
• Client schedules in community and home care
• Service level commitments and care minutes

Effective workforce planning translates this demand into:

• Required hours of care
• Skill mix by time of day and day of week
• Variability and peak requirements
• Minimum safe staffing levels

This creates a fact-based foundation for rostering decisions.

Aligning Care Models and Workforce Design

Different care models require different workforce structures. For example:

• Continuity-focused models prioritise stable assignments
• Flexible response models require multi-skilled staff
• Community models require travel and scheduling optimisation

Workforce planning must align explicitly to the chosen care model.

Building Better Rosters: Balancing Care, Cost and Workforce Experience

Good rostering is about trade-offs. There is no perfect roster — only better-informed decisions.

Key Principles of Effective Rostering

• Demand-aligned: Rosters reflect when care is actually needed
• Skill-appropriate: The right mix of qualifications and experience is available
• Fair and transparent: Staff understand how rosters are built
• Compliant by design: Awards and fatigue rules are embedded
• Cost-aware: Overtime and premium labour are minimised

Importantly, good rosters reduce the need for constant rework during execution.

Scheduling in Dynamic Care Environments

Even the best rosters cannot predict everything. Absences, demand spikes and unplanned events are inevitable.

Effective scheduling capability allows organisations to:

• Rapidly redeploy staff
• Minimise disruption to care continuity
• Reduce reliance on overtime and agency staff
• Maintain service quality under pressure

In community and aged care settings, scheduling also includes managing travel time, sequencing visits, and adjusting routes as conditions change.

The Role of Technology in Workforce Planning and Scheduling

Technology is a critical enabler — but only when implemented with a clear operating model in mind.

What Technology Should Enable

Rather than focusing on systems alone, organisations should focus on capability:

• Forecasting workforce requirements based on demand
• Building compliant, optimised rosters
• Managing real-time changes effectively
• Providing visibility into cost, utilisation and risk
• Supporting managers rather than burdening them

Why Technology Alone Is Not Enough

Many organisations invest in rostering systems but see limited improvement. This usually occurs because:

• Demand modelling is weak or absent
• Processes are poorly defined
• Data quality is inconsistent
• Change management is underestimated

Technology should support better decisions — not replace the need for them.

Measuring What Matters

Sustainable improvement requires clear performance measures.

Effective workforce metrics may include:

• Cost per hour of care delivered
• Overtime and agency utilisation
• Rostering stability
• Skill mix compliance
• Workforce utilisation
• Absenteeism and turnover
• Service reliability and continuity

Importantly, metrics should support learning and improvement, not just reporting.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

Trace Consultants works with health and aged care organisations across Australia and New Zealand to strengthen workforce planning, rostering and scheduling capability in a practical, sustainable way.

Trace supports organisations to:

• Understand demand drivers and care requirements
• Design workforce models aligned to care strategies
• Improve workforce planning and forecasting processes
• Redesign rostering and scheduling operating models
• Select and configure enabling technology
• Improve performance visibility and governance
• Reduce reliance on reactive labour solutions
• Build capability within management teams

Trace brings experience across hospitals, aged care providers, community services and disability organisations, with a strong understanding of the regulatory, operational and workforce realities unique to the sector.

Critically, Trace’s approach is independent and grounded in operational reality — focused on outcomes, not tools or theory.

Looking Ahead: Workforce Sustainability as a Competitive Advantage

The organisations that will thrive in health and aged care over the coming decade are those that treat workforce management as a core capability, not an administrative burden.

Effective workforce planning, rostering and scheduling enable:

• Better care outcomes
• More engaged and sustainable workforces
• Lower and more predictable costs
• Greater resilience in the face of disruption

The challenges are significant — but so is the opportunity.

By investing in the right foundations now, organisations can move beyond constant firefighting and build workforce models that support both care excellence and financial sustainability.

‍