Trace Consultants – Demand Planning as a Service

If you’ve ever tried to fix forecasting and inventory, you’ll recognise the pattern. A new tool is rolled out, a pilot sings, and then BAU hits. Planners are stretched, the data isn’t quite right, a few manual “shortcuts” creep in, and the shiny new process starts to wobble. Meanwhile, sales wants more stock “just in case”, finance wants working capital back, and suppliers are quoting longer lead times. Everyone is busy. Not everyone is confident.

Demand Planning as a Service (DPaaS) is a different way of solving the problem. Rather than buying software and hoping for the best, you subscribe to an outcome: a standing planning capability with the right people, cadence, and pragmatic tech—measured on results, not rhetoric.

This article sets out what DPaaS looks like for Australian and New Zealand organisations, when it makes sense, the common traps to avoid, and how Trace Consultants stands it up and runs it with you.

What is DPaaS—really?

Think of DPaaS as renting a high-performing planning engine. You get:

• A weekly and monthly rhythm that matches your commercial cycles, with clear decision gates.
• Forecasting that blends statistics, causal drivers (promotions, price, events, weather), and human judgement.
• Inventory policies that connect the forecast to safety stock and replenishment in a transparent, auditable way.
• Clean data practices and parameter governance, so settings don’t drift over time.
• Performance management that focuses on the right metrics—forecast accuracy, bias, service, and working capital—and turns those metrics into action.

It’s not a system, a single contractor, or a deck of recommendations. It’s a capability that runs, every week.

Why it matters now in Australia & New Zealand

Our geography and market dynamics magnify the cost of error. Long import lead times. Interstate transfer lags. Seasonality, tourism cycles, and event spikes. Shelf-life constraints in food and healthcare. The result is a constant balancing act: carry too much and costs swell; carry too little and service falls over. Add tight labour markets—especially for experienced planners outside the capitals—and the challenge deepens.

DPaaS helps by right-sizing the team, solidifying the operating rhythm, and using tech where it earns its keep. You get quicker time-to-value, fewer firefights, and a planning practice that sticks.

Who gets the most benefit

• Retail and FMCG. Promotions, pack changes, supplier MOQs, and DC constraints make accuracy and parameter discipline critical.
• Manufacturing. Multi-stage BOMs, changeovers, and component variability demand a planning approach that is hierarchy-aware and grounded in reality.
• Healthcare and Aged Care. Critical item availability with stewardship expectations and expiry risk requires service-based policy, not guesswork.
• Hospitality, Integrated Resorts, and Venues. Event-driven spikes, perishables, and central kitchens benefit from a tight weekly drumbeat and clear hand-offs.
• Public Sector and Universities. Budget cycles and service targets need a repeatable, transparent planning cadence more than another tool.

If you’ve got stock-outs on some lines and slow movers gathering dust on others, DPaaS was built for that situation.

Outcomes you should expect

A credible DPaaS engagement ties effort to outcomes. In practice, that looks like:

• Higher forecast accuracy at the level where decisions are made, with bias trending down—not hidden in overrides.
• Service levels that improve without simply throwing stock at the problem.
• Inventory that is healthier, with smarter safety stocks, fewer expedites, and less waste.
• Shorter, more predictable planning cycles so Sales, Supply, and Finance can decide faster.
• Master data and parameters that stop drifting and start behaving.

The anatomy of good DPaaS

A working cadence

There’s a weekly demand review with exception lists and promotional overlays, and a monthly demand sign-off into S&OP/IBP. Quarterly reviews recalibrate policy: safety stock logic, target service levels, planning horizons, lead times. Meetings start on time, decisions are recorded, and next steps are owned.

Forecasting that respects the signal

The statistical base detects seasonality and trend, uses intermittent logic where needed, and avoids forecasting at a level that is just noise. Causal drivers (price, promotion mechanics, events, even weather when relevant) adjust the base. Human judgement is invited—but tracked—so it helps rather than harms.

Policy that is explicit

Service targets are clear. Safety stock is calculated from actual variability and supply risk, not a blanket “days’ cover”. MOQs and lot sizes are modelled so planners see the trade-offs. Parameter changes are governed and auditable.

Data care and light integrations

We align to your source of truth (ERP/WMS/OMS) and fix the basics: phantom lead times, messy calendars, late orders, short shipments. Interfaces start simple and harden as value is proven. There’s no mystery master data living in a spreadsheet on someone’s desktop.

Performance management that leads to action

MAPE and weighted accuracy for the important SKUs and families. Bias split by over- and under-forecasting. Service (OTIF/DIFOT) with root causes. Inventory health by segment, plus aged stock and write-off trends. Plan adherence. These are presented together so trade-offs are visible, not buried.

“Buy a tool” or “hire a planner” vs DPaaS

Software has a place; great planners do too. But tools alone don’t create adoption, and a single senior hire is a single point of failure. DPaaS brings the trio—people, process, tech—together from day one, with time-to-value as the test. You can absolutely introduce heavier tooling later; it’ll land cleaner when the rhythm is already humming.

A pragmatic technology stance

Many organisations already own capable tools inside their ERP landscape. Often they’re under-used. Our bias is to start lean, automate the boring parts, and scale once the operating rhythm is steady. When a heavier Advanced Planning System makes sense, we implement it against a validated blueprint—less risk, better adoption, and no illusions.

Trace also offers a modular toolkit (our .Solutions suite—such as .Planner for demand and replenishment) to accelerate early wins. It’s not a black box. It’s transparent, governed, and designed to play nicely with your systems or step aside later if you choose.

How we structure a DPaaS engagement

Phase 1: Diagnostic & Design (about four to six weeks).
We scan the current forecast flow, understand where it breaks, and segment SKUs by value, volatility, and supply risk. We baseline metrics—accuracy, bias, service, inventory health—at a sensible decision level. Then we design the operating cadence, roles, policy, and “minimum viable tech” you need now. The output is a 90-day plan and a 12-month roadmap.

Phase 2: Mobilise & Prove (first 90 days).
We stand up the weekly rhythm, build exception lists, and establish promotional overlays and sign-offs. We refresh key parameters—safety stocks and lead times—on the high-value, high-volatility items first. Quick wins typically include stabilising noisy SKUs, reducing expedites, and getting a realistic picture of aged and slow-moving stock.

Phase 3: Run & Improve (months four to twelve).
We operate the cadence with your team, shift manual work into automation where it’s proved its value, and embed policy governance. Quarterly reviews with Finance and Supply reset service vs working capital posture deliberately, not accidentally. We invest in knowledge transfer so you can insource later if that’s your plan.

Roles and ownership that prevent confusion

Your Category or Sales teams contribute range changes, promotional mechanics, and price moves, then sign off the demand plan at the agreed gates. Supply brings constraints, capacity, and supplier reality to the table. Finance sets service posture and working capital expectations and ensures the plan connects to budgets. An executive sponsor removes blockers and keeps the cadence visible. Trace runs the engine: statistical models, exception management, parameter governance, facilitation, reporting, and continuous improvement. Clear roles keep everyone away from the “who owns the number?” loop.

What good looks like in practice

There’s one calendar and a shared cadence. Inputs are clear and short. Exceptions are queued; people aren’t hunting through four versions of the same report. Safety stock and service targets are visible and defended. Overrides are tracked and debated with evidence. Misses are reviewed for learning, not blame. The cycle gets smoother, then faster.

Common pitfalls—and how we avoid them

Forecasting at the wrong level.
When SKU-store is pure noise, we move up a level and disaggregate intelligently. Accuracy at the wrong level is still error.

Hidden bias.
We make judgement transparent and track bias by person, category, and horizon. People respond to facts, not finger-pointing.

Promotions without mechanics.
We capture uplift assumptions and cannibalisation explicitly, then review post-event so the model improves. “Because it’s promoted” isn’t a plan.

Parameter rot.
We put governance in place so safety stocks and lead times change with evidence. No folklore. No “set and forget”.

Tech before people.
We sequence tooling to support the rhythm, not to replace it. Adoption follows usefulness.

The KPIs that matter—and how to talk about them

Forecast accuracy and MAPE should be reported at the level where decisions are made—top families, top value SKUs, or key channels. Bias deserves equal airtime; it’s the quiet killer of inventory and service. Service (OTIF/DIFOT) needs root causes tagged so action can follow. Inventory health is about stock cover by segment, aged stock, and write-offs, not just a total number. Plan adherence shows whether the plan holds or whether firefighting drove outcomes.

We present these together because each tells only part of the story. Accuracy without service is a party trick; service delivered purely by stock is expensive.

What we need from you

We don’t need a data lake and a multi-year programme to start. We do need willingness to simplify, a visible sponsor, and access to enough data to plan properly—sales history, inventory snapshots, lead times, and a promotions calendar. We also need honesty about constraints so we can plan to them, not around them.

How Trace Consultants helps

We’re operators first.
Our team has run planning and supply functions inside retail, healthcare, hospitality, and manufacturing. We’ve felt the pain of messy cut-offs, short shipments, and late promotions. We design DPaaS for the real world: the dock, the line, the DC, the store.

We bring a right-sized toolkit.
Our .Solutions components (including .Planner) reduce the manual grind and surface exceptions quickly. They’re transparent and auditable, and they integrate with your environment. If you later adopt a heavier suite, we’ll help you make the switch cleanly.

We design for insourcing.
Some clients keep the service long-term. Others prefer to build in-house capability once the rhythm is embedded. We document, train, and progressively hand back, so you’re not locked in.

What we won’t do.
We won’t fabricate case studies. We won’t sell technology for its own sake. We won’t bury you in jargon or 80-page reports that never get used. The test is whether service, accuracy, and working capital move in the right direction—and stay there.

A straightforward roadmap to get started

Weeks 0–2: Orientation and access.
Confirm scope (categories, channels, sites) and success measures. Agree data extracts. Identify obvious early wins.

Weeks 3–6: Baseline and design.
Establish baseline MAPE, bias, service, and inventory health. Draft the cadence, roles, and first parameter refresh plan. Build the first set of exception views and reporting.

Weeks 7–12: Run the rhythm.
Operate the weekly demand cycle live, including clear decision gates. Refresh parameters for the top value and volatility items. Stabilise critical SKUs, reduce expedites, and make aged stock visible with a plan.

Month 4 onwards: Scale and improve.
Extend to remaining ranges and sites, automate what has proved valuable, and formalise quarterly reviews to reset service and inventory posture with Finance and Supply.

Commercial models that encourage the right behaviour

We favour simple commercial models that reward durable improvement. A base service fee covers the standing capability, with a sensible portion linked to agreed measures—accuracy uplift at the decision level, service improvement within an inventory posture guardrail, or plan adherence where it matters. Scope can start narrow (a range, a channel, a region) and scale as results show. From day one, we document what you eventually want to insource and when, so the pathway is clear.

Change management that actually sticks

People adopt what makes their week easier. That means role clarity, short training bursts anchored to the cycle, and visible wins that are shared widely. It also means retiring redundant reports and meetings rather than running the old and the new in parallel forever. Leaders set the tone by backing the cadence and using the same numbers the teams use.

Frequently asked questions

Do we need a new system to begin?
Not necessarily. We often start with your current ERP and a light layer of tooling. If a heavier suite is warranted later, you’ll implement it against a proven rhythm with clear requirements.

How do you handle promotions and events?
We capture mechanics—discount, placement, media—and select historical analogues. After the event, we compare actual uplift to the plan and refine assumptions. Over time, the model stops guessing and starts learning.

Can parts of the process stay in-house?
Yes. Many organisations keep category overlays and final sign-off while Trace runs the statistical engine, exceptions, and parameter governance. We design to your capability and appetite.

What about supplier collaboration?
Where it helps, we align the cadence with supplier lead times and share meaningful forward views. We also clean up noise so suppliers aren’t reacting to fiction.

When do results show up?
Most teams feel stability and planning discipline in the first 90 days as parameters refresh and the weekly cycle matures. KPI movement follows with fewer expedites, steadier service, and clearer inventory posture.

Signs you’re ready for DPaaS

Inventory is climbing but service isn’t improving. Forecast accuracy feels like a circular conversation. Planners are spending hours in spreadsheets and fire drills. You’ve tried “tool first” and adoption stalled. Finance is asking for a plan that people trust. If a few of these sound familiar, a managed planning capability can relieve the pressure quickly and build a platform that’s worth keeping.

How to brief us

Keep it simple. Tell us the relevant categories, channels, and sites; your target service posture and working capital expectations; key constraints (capacity, shelf-life, regulatory), and where planning breaks most often today. We’ll take it from there—cadence, exceptions, parameter governance, and the training rhythm to make it stick.

Final word

DPaaS isn’t a silver bullet. It’s a practical way to get the fundamentals right—every week—so your organisation can make better calls with fewer surprises. In Australia and New Zealand, where distance, seasonality, and capacity constraints make errors expensive, a disciplined, right-sized planning service delivers outsized value.

Trace Consultants can help you stand it up quickly, run it well, and—if you choose—bring it in-house on your terms. No theatrics. No jargon. Just a consistent planning engine that lifts accuracy, protects service, and releases working capital.

Interested in exploring DPaaS with Trace Consultants?
Let’s have a short conversation about your categories, channels, and targets. We’ll outline a 90-day plan you can execute.

‍

Shelf Availability: Lifting DIFOT into Retail RDCs

Shelf availability is the moment of truth. Customers don’t care that your containers arrived on time, your pallets cleared the RDC, or your ASN matched the carton count. They care whether the product is on the shelf when they’re standing in the aisle. In Victoria for example —where most FMCG suppliers ship into retailer RDCs concentrated across Melbourne’s west (Derrimut, Truganina, Laverton North) and south-east (Dandenong, Keysborough)—availability hinges on mundane but decisive mechanics: forecast accuracy by cluster, allocation logic, pallet conformance, booking windows, transport reliability, and how cleanly the back-dock hands stock to the shelf-replenishment cycle.

Why shelf availability breaks (and where to look first)

Most availability gaps trace back to a handful of recurring failure modes:

1. Forecast and allocation drift
   • Averages hide reality. Cluster demand in Melbourne behaves differently to regional Victoria, and stores within metro clusters diverge during weather spikes or events.
   • Allocations lag plan changes. Sales pull forward demand for promotions or display builds but allocations and DC waves don’t update in time.
2. RDC non-compliance
   • Pallet spec miss (height, overhang, wrap gauge, labelling position).
   • ASN mismatches (SSCCs not aligned to what’s physically arriving).
   • Booking windows missed, or trucks queued with incorrect time bands.
3. Promo readiness failure
   • Uplift factors guessed, not modelled; cannibalisation not accounted for.
   • POS and display stock arrive out of sequence with base stock replenishment.
   • Store back-rooms lack space or shift capacity to execute the plan.
4. Transport and wave design
   • Loads arrive outside shelf-replenishment cycles; pallets sit in the cage overnight and miss peak trading.
   • Route plans and linehaul cut-offs assume smooth traffic despite Melbourne’s works and peak-hour realities.
5. Data noise and slow feedback
   • Item masters, carton counts, and pack configurations are out of sync across systems.
   • Exceptions are closed slowly; the root cause is guessed rather than measured.

The fix is not a single silver bullet. It’s a set of small, repeatable behaviours that tighten hand-offs from plan to shelf.

Start at the top: plan what stores actually need

1) Forecast by cluster and event, not just by state

• Cluster Victoria by store archetype (CBD convenience, suburban family, regional growth, tourist corridor). Patterns diverge on heatwaves, school holidays, AFL finals, and public holidays.
• Use short-interval demand sensing for Melbourne metro: weather swings and event calendars cause real, same-week variance.
• Model cannibalisation for promos and NPD: one SKU’s lift often steals from a close substitute. Don’t double-count.

2) Allocation rules that reflect reality

• Establish service-level tiers by SKU and store type (e.g., 98% for high-rotation essentials, 95% for mainstream, 90% for long-tail).
• Pre-allocate promotional stock to clusters with proven uplift; hold a central protection pool to top-up high-performing stores mid-week.
• For fragile or bulky SKUs, pre-build store packs where the retailer allows; this reduces back-dock handling time and shelf delay.

Outcome: fewer “phantom” OOS created by allocations that didn’t reflect the real demand mix.

Make the inbound unquestionable: RDC compliance that just works

3) Pallet conformance is non-negotiable

• Lock height/weight limits, overhang, wrap gauge, corner boards, label positions into your pick and pack SOPs.
• Print a one-page RDC spec card for your DC and third-party pack sites. Photograph one pallet per SKU per day at the end of the wrap, archive shots against SSCC.

4) ASN and SSCC discipline

• Generate SSCCs at the moment a pallet is finalised, not earlier.
• Transmit ASNs as soon as pallets are staged, not after truck departure.
• Reconcile ASN vs received daily with your customers and close exceptions within 24 hours.

5) Booking windows and dwell

• Reserve booking slots aligned to your pick cycles and transport waves—do not leave it to “first available”.
• Measure arrival vs booked time and dock-to-offload dwell; escalate repeat offenders with the carrier.
• For fast-moving lines, aim for morning arrivals that flow into same-day shelf cycles.

Outcome: higher acceptance rates, fewer reworks, and reliable dock-to-shelf timing.

Transport and DC waves that match store reality

6) Align truck wheels with shelf cycles

• Map store replenishment windows by cluster. Time your RDC arrivals so stock hits the shelf before peak trading, not after.
• If your Melbourne DC is west-based and you’re serving south-east stores through an RDC, stage earlier to allow traffic buffers on Mon–Wed.

7) Route design and capacity

• Use time-of-day routing to avoid peak congestion corridors. Shoulder deliveries can lift effective DIFOT without extra fleet.
• Maintain a small surge carrier panel for promo weeks; buying a few extra fixed slots is cheaper than missed sales and penalties.

8) Cross-dock vs stock

• Cross-dock high-velocity lines and promotional pallets.
• Hold long-tail and build to hit store clusters, not just ship when ready.
• Anchor this in your WMS so teams aren’t making manual calls on the dock.

Outcome: trucks show up when stores can actually convert pallets into shelf presence.

Promo readiness: where availability reputations are made (or lost)

9) Forecast uplift with discipline

• Don’t rely on a flat uplift factor. Use like-event history, weather overlays, and store-level elasticities.
• Identify display-driven volume vs price-driven volume; they behave differently.

10) Sequence POS and base stock

• Deliver base stock that lifts shelf capacity before POS lands.
• Where possible, use pre-built display units or outer carton configurations that speed execution.
• Confirm store back-room capability for bulky displays; if space is tight, stagger deliveries.

11) Protect the week

• Hold a cluster-level top-up pool for the first 48–72 hours of promo to rescue outperforming stores quickly.
• Stage spare booking slots; one rescue slot per day during the first promo week repays itself.

Outcome: promos start strong, stores don’t run dry by Thursday, and you avoid emergency loads.

Data hygiene: clean masters, clean moves, clean KPIs

12) Item masters and pack logic

• Standardise case counts, dimensions, weights, barcodes, and inner/outer pack relationships across ERP, WMS, and retailer systems.
• Lock carton-to-shelf conversion logic to prevent non-conforming planograms.

13) Exceptions taxonomy

• Use a common exception code set for late, partial, damaged, mislabeled, over-height, missing SSCC, missed booking, carrier-caused, DC-caused.
• Close exceptions in 24 hours and publish weekly Pareto charts (top 5 causes, corrective action owner, due date).

14) Control-tower visibility

• One dashboard: forecast accuracy by cluster, DIFOT to RDC, ASN accuracy, dock dwell, pallet conformance failure rate, store OSA (where available), and promo sell-through.
• Colour what you pay for: if you’re penalised for missed bookings or non-conformance, put it at the top.

Outcome: faster learning loops and fewer repeat errors.

People and cadence: operational rhythm that keeps shelves full

15) A weekly trading rhythm

• Monday: last week’s OSA and DIFOT review; plan changes for this week; promo check.
• Mid-week: exception stand-up (15 minutes); close aged issues; confirm rescue slots.
• Friday: next week VLAN (vessel loads, linehaul, allocations) and DC labour plan.

16) DC floor standards

• Pallet QA before wrap; photo archive with SSCC; label placement checks.
• A visible “RDC spec wall” at end of each line; spot-check every hour in promo weeks.

17) Sales–Supply alignment

• 30-minute sales & supply huddle at the start of each promo: uplift vs plan, store feedback, shelf execution blockers, and top-up decisions.

Outcome: fewer surprises and faster cross-functional decisions.

Metrics that actually move shelf availability

Track a short list, automate as much as possible, and tie a subset to partner payments:

• Forecast & allocation: WMAPE by cluster and SKU tier; allocation adherence (% stock to plan).
• Inbound reliability: DIFOT to RDC (P50/P90), dock dwell, pallet conformance fail %.
• Data integrity: ASN accuracy %, SSCC scan failures per 1,000 pallets, master data defect rate.
• Promo health: day-1 and day-3 sell-through vs plan; top-up response time.
• Shelf outcomes: OSA %, shelf-gap minutes per store (where supplied), lost sales estimate (signals).
• Cost & sustainability: cost-to-serve per case; packaging exceptions; tCO₂e per delivery (optional but useful for internal trade-offs).

A 30–60–90 day plan to lift DIFOT and OSA in Victoria

Days 1–30: Stabilise compliance and visibility

• Publish RDC spec cards and embed photo QA at pallet wrap; train crews.
• Shift SSCC creation to point of pallet completion; send ASNs at staging.
• Stand up a single dashboard for DIFOT, pallet conformance, dock dwell, and ASN accuracy.
• Lock a booking discipline: set target arrival bands by SKU tier and cluster.
• Run a Melbourne promo readiness clinic on your next two campaigns.

Days 31–60: Accelerate flow and close exceptions

• Re-cut DC waves to align with retailer booking windows and store shelf cycles.
• Introduce cluster-based allocations and a small protection pool for top-ups.
• Add shoulder or night route windows to protect morning shelf availability.
• Implement a 24-hour exception closure SLA; publish a weekly Pareto with root-cause owners.

Days 61–90: Embed resilience and scale

• Formalise surge carrier capacity and one rescue booking slot per day in promo week one.
• Pilot pre-built store packs or display units where allowed to speed floor execution.
• Add short-interval demand sensing (weather/events) for Melbourne metro to adjust allocations intra-week.
• Tie small performance fees to pallet conformance and on-time arrival tiers with carriers and pack partners.

Common pitfalls—and how to avoid them

1. Treating OSA as “a store problem.” If inbound pallets and ASNs are wrong or late, back-dock is already behind. Fix upstream.
2. Flat uplift factors. Use like-event and cluster logic; promo uplift is not uniform across Melbourne.
3. Late ASNs. If you transmit after departure, the RDC can’t plan labour or lanes. Send at staging.
4. One carrier, one time band. Diversify and use shoulder windows to protect day-1 shelf cycles.
5. Spec drift on pallets. Small misses trigger rework and delays. Photo QA plus a spec wall cuts failures fast.
6. KPI sprawl. Five to seven metrics, automated and reviewed weekly, beat twenty that no one owns.

How Trace Consultants can help

Melbourne OSA diagnostic (2–3 weeks)

• Map forecast-to-shelf hand-offs across your top 30 SKUs. Quantify where minutes and cases are lost: allocation rules, booking discipline, pallet conformance, dock dwell, and promo sequencing.

RDC compliance and ASN uplift

• Rewrite pallet and ASN SOPs, implement photo QA tied to SSCCs, and train DC teams. Put in place a 24-hour exception closure process with a standard code set.

Wave and route redesign

• Align DC pick waves and linehaul departures to retailer bookings and store shelf cycles. Introduce shoulder routes to protect morning availability.

Promo readiness engine

• Build cluster-based uplift models, cannibalisation logic, and a top-up protection pool with pre-booked rescue slots for week one.

Control-tower and KPIs

• Stand up a single dashboard covering DIFOT, pallet conformance, ASN accuracy, dock dwell, promo sell-through, and (where available) OSA. Automate data feeds and set weekly cadences.

Capability and cadence

• Coach your supply, DC, transport, and sales teams on the 30–60–90 plan; establish a durable weekly rhythm and close-loop CI.

Sustainability and cost-to-serve

• Reduce rework, packaging waste, and redundant kilometres with better conformance and route timing—lowering cost while protecting service.

Raising shelf availability in Victoria isn’t about throwing more inventory at the problem. It’s about precision: forecast by cluster, allocate with intent, build compliant pallets, send clean ASNs, hit the right booking windows, and time arrivals to store shelf cycles. Do those things consistently, measure them on one page each week, and availability rises without waste. That’s the kind of reliability retailers reward and customers notice.

‍

Advanced Planning Systems: A Practical Guide for Australian & New Zealand Organisations

1. Why Advanced Planning Systems Are Moving Up the ANZ Agenda

In Australia and New Zealand, supply chains face a unique blend of challenges—vast distances, variable lead times, constrained labour markets, and unpredictable demand. In this environment, the traditional approach to supply chain planning—spread across spreadsheets, disconnected systems, and departmental silos—has real limits.

Enter Advanced Planning Systems (APS): technology platforms designed to connect, optimise, and automate planning processes across demand, supply, inventory, and production. They provide a single version of the truth, enabling faster and more accurate decision-making.

At Trace Consultants, we see APS not as a “plug-and-play” magic bullet but as a toolset that must be carefully selected, configured, and embedded into your operating model to deliver lasting value.

2. What Exactly Is an Advanced Planning System?

An APS is a specialised software platform that integrates data from across your business and uses algorithms, analytics, and automation to optimise supply chain plans. Unlike traditional ERP planning modules, APS tools are designed to look forward, model scenarios, and optimise outcomes rather than simply record transactions.

Core capabilities often include:

• Demand Planning & Forecasting – Using statistical models and machine learning to generate accurate demand plans.
• Inventory Optimisation – Balancing stock levels across the network to minimise working capital while maintaining service.
• Supply Planning – Aligning procurement, production, and distribution to meet demand within capacity constraints.
• Production Scheduling – Optimising manufacturing sequences for efficiency, throughput, and quality.
• Scenario Planning – Simulating “what-if” situations, such as supplier delays or demand surges, before they happen.

The best APS platforms create visibility across the entire supply chain, from suppliers to customers, enabling proactive rather than reactive management.

3. Why APS Matters for Australian and New Zealand Businesses

3.1 Long Lead Times & Geographic Spread

Import-heavy supply chains, inter-island transport in NZ, and long-haul domestic freight in Australia make accurate forecasting and inventory positioning essential.

3.2 Seasonal and Promotional Volatility

From peak tourism periods to retail holiday seasons, APS can model seasonal curves and promotional lifts, helping avoid both stockouts and overstocks.

3.3 Cost Pressures

Labour, transport, and raw material costs are all rising. APS can reduce inefficiencies and improve asset utilisation, lowering cost per unit.

3.4 Sustainability and ESG Goals

APS can help reduce waste, optimise transport routes, and improve energy usage—supporting sustainability reporting and compliance.

4. The Benefits of an APS Done Well

When implemented properly, APS can deliver:

• Improved Forecast Accuracy – Better predictions of demand patterns, leading to more efficient supply decisions.
• Reduced Working Capital – Lower inventory holdings without risking service.
• Increased Service Levels – Meeting customer demand more consistently.
• Enhanced Supply Chain Resilience – Rapid response to disruptions with scenario modelling.
• Better Cross-Functional Alignment – Commercial, operational, and financial teams planning from the same numbers.
• Faster Decision-Making – Automated alerts and planning cycles reduce lag between event and action.

5. Common Pitfalls in APS Projects

Many ANZ organisations struggle to unlock the full potential of APS because of:

1. Poor Data Quality – An APS is only as good as the data it receives.
2. Unclear Objectives – Without a clear business case, scope creep and underuse are common.
3. Over-Customisation – Excessive tailoring can make systems hard to maintain and upgrade.
4. Lack of Change Management – APS adoption requires new behaviours as well as new tools.
5. Technology-Led Thinking – Choosing the system before defining the process and requirements.

At Trace Consultants, we put process and people first, ensuring technology supports rather than dictates the operating model.

6. How APS Fits with S&OP and IBP

An APS can turbocharge your Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) process by providing the data, analytics, and scenarios needed to make informed decisions.

In more mature organisations, APS also supports Integrated Business Planning (IBP)—linking operational plans to strategic and financial plans.

Think of it like this:

• S&OP/IBP = The decision-making framework.
• APS = The intelligence engine feeding that framework.

7. Selecting the Right APS for Your Business

Step 1: Define Your Objectives

What problem are you trying to solve—forecast accuracy, inventory reduction, production efficiency, or all of the above?

Step 2: Map Your Processes

Document your current planning processes and identify pain points.

Step 3: Build Functional Requirements

Define what capabilities the system must have, including integration needs.

Step 4: Evaluate Vendors

Compare functionality, scalability, ease of use, and total cost of ownership.

Step 5: Plan for Implementation and Adoption

Consider training, process redesign, and governance from the outset.

Trace Consultants often supports clients through vendor evaluation, helping them navigate the crowded APS market with objectivity.

8. Implementation: From Planning to Go-Live

A successful APS project usually follows these phases:

1. Discovery & Design – Process mapping, data audits, and solution design.
2. Configuration – Setting up the system to align with business processes.
3. Data Migration – Cleansing, loading, and validating master and transaction data.
4. Testing & Simulation – Running planning cycles in a sandbox to refine settings.
5. Training & Change Management – Ensuring users understand both the system and the “why” behind it.
6. Go-Live & Hypercare – Monitoring and fine-tuning in the early weeks of operation.

9. How Trace Consultants Can Help

We bring a practical, supply-chain-first approach to APS projects—helping you avoid the common traps and realise value faster.

Our support spans:

• Readiness Assessments – Evaluating your current state, data maturity, and business case.
• Process & Operating Model Design – Defining how planning will work before the system is selected.
• Vendor Selection Support – Shortlisting and assessing vendors based on your needs, not their marketing.
• Implementation Partner Support – Acting as your advocate during vendor-led implementations.
• Change Management & Training – Ensuring adoption through role clarity, capability building, and leadership engagement.
• Post-Go-Live Optimisation – Measuring outcomes, refining settings, and embedding continuous improvement.

You can read more on our technology transformation services.

10. APS in Key ANZ Industries

Retail & FMCG

Managing high SKU counts, promotions, and omnichannel distribution requires precise forecasting and inventory optimisation.

Manufacturing

APS can optimise production sequencing, material planning, and capacity utilisation.

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

For these sectors, APS supports critical service levels, compliance, and shelf-life management.

Mining & Resources

Complex, multi-tier supply chains with long lead times benefit from APS-driven inventory and demand planning.

11. Measuring APS Success

Success should be measured against the original business case. Common metrics include:

• Forecast accuracy
• Inventory turns
• Service level (fill rate, DIFOT)
• Planning cycle time reduction
• Working capital reduction
• Waste or obsolescence reduction

12. Future of APS in ANZ

• AI & Machine Learning – Further automation of forecasting and optimisation.
• End-to-End Digital Twins – Simulating the supply chain in real time.
• Sustainability Metrics Integration – Embedding carbon, waste, and energy KPIs into planning.
• Cloud-Native Solutions – Greater scalability and integration flexibility.

Final Word

In the ANZ supply chain landscape—where distance, cost, and complexity create constant challenges—Advanced Planning Systems offer a real competitive advantage. But they’re only effective when they’re matched to the right processes, embedded into the right operating model, and embraced by the people who use them.

At Trace Consultants, we ensure APS investments deliver measurable value—aligning your planning processes, technology, and people so your supply chain can perform at its best.

‍