Shelf Availability: Lifting DIFOT into Retail RDCs

Shelf availability is the moment of truth. Customers don’t care that your containers arrived on time, your pallets cleared the RDC, or your ASN matched the carton count. They care whether the product is on the shelf when they’re standing in the aisle. In Victoria for example —where most FMCG suppliers ship into retailer RDCs concentrated across Melbourne’s west (Derrimut, Truganina, Laverton North) and south-east (Dandenong, Keysborough)—availability hinges on mundane but decisive mechanics: forecast accuracy by cluster, allocation logic, pallet conformance, booking windows, transport reliability, and how cleanly the back-dock hands stock to the shelf-replenishment cycle.

Why shelf availability breaks (and where to look first)

Most availability gaps trace back to a handful of recurring failure modes:

1. Forecast and allocation drift
   • Averages hide reality. Cluster demand in Melbourne behaves differently to regional Victoria, and stores within metro clusters diverge during weather spikes or events.
   • Allocations lag plan changes. Sales pull forward demand for promotions or display builds but allocations and DC waves don’t update in time.
2. RDC non-compliance
   • Pallet spec miss (height, overhang, wrap gauge, labelling position).
   • ASN mismatches (SSCCs not aligned to what’s physically arriving).
   • Booking windows missed, or trucks queued with incorrect time bands.
3. Promo readiness failure
   • Uplift factors guessed, not modelled; cannibalisation not accounted for.
   • POS and display stock arrive out of sequence with base stock replenishment.
   • Store back-rooms lack space or shift capacity to execute the plan.
4. Transport and wave design
   • Loads arrive outside shelf-replenishment cycles; pallets sit in the cage overnight and miss peak trading.
   • Route plans and linehaul cut-offs assume smooth traffic despite Melbourne’s works and peak-hour realities.
5. Data noise and slow feedback
   • Item masters, carton counts, and pack configurations are out of sync across systems.
   • Exceptions are closed slowly; the root cause is guessed rather than measured.

The fix is not a single silver bullet. It’s a set of small, repeatable behaviours that tighten hand-offs from plan to shelf.

Start at the top: plan what stores actually need

1) Forecast by cluster and event, not just by state

• Cluster Victoria by store archetype (CBD convenience, suburban family, regional growth, tourist corridor). Patterns diverge on heatwaves, school holidays, AFL finals, and public holidays.
• Use short-interval demand sensing for Melbourne metro: weather swings and event calendars cause real, same-week variance.
• Model cannibalisation for promos and NPD: one SKU’s lift often steals from a close substitute. Don’t double-count.

2) Allocation rules that reflect reality

• Establish service-level tiers by SKU and store type (e.g., 98% for high-rotation essentials, 95% for mainstream, 90% for long-tail).
• Pre-allocate promotional stock to clusters with proven uplift; hold a central protection pool to top-up high-performing stores mid-week.
• For fragile or bulky SKUs, pre-build store packs where the retailer allows; this reduces back-dock handling time and shelf delay.

Outcome: fewer “phantom” OOS created by allocations that didn’t reflect the real demand mix.

Make the inbound unquestionable: RDC compliance that just works

3) Pallet conformance is non-negotiable

• Lock height/weight limits, overhang, wrap gauge, corner boards, label positions into your pick and pack SOPs.
• Print a one-page RDC spec card for your DC and third-party pack sites. Photograph one pallet per SKU per day at the end of the wrap, archive shots against SSCC.

4) ASN and SSCC discipline

• Generate SSCCs at the moment a pallet is finalised, not earlier.
• Transmit ASNs as soon as pallets are staged, not after truck departure.
• Reconcile ASN vs received daily with your customers and close exceptions within 24 hours.

5) Booking windows and dwell

• Reserve booking slots aligned to your pick cycles and transport waves—do not leave it to “first available”.
• Measure arrival vs booked time and dock-to-offload dwell; escalate repeat offenders with the carrier.
• For fast-moving lines, aim for morning arrivals that flow into same-day shelf cycles.

Outcome: higher acceptance rates, fewer reworks, and reliable dock-to-shelf timing.

Transport and DC waves that match store reality

6) Align truck wheels with shelf cycles

• Map store replenishment windows by cluster. Time your RDC arrivals so stock hits the shelf before peak trading, not after.
• If your Melbourne DC is west-based and you’re serving south-east stores through an RDC, stage earlier to allow traffic buffers on Mon–Wed.

7) Route design and capacity

• Use time-of-day routing to avoid peak congestion corridors. Shoulder deliveries can lift effective DIFOT without extra fleet.
• Maintain a small surge carrier panel for promo weeks; buying a few extra fixed slots is cheaper than missed sales and penalties.

8) Cross-dock vs stock

• Cross-dock high-velocity lines and promotional pallets.
• Hold long-tail and build to hit store clusters, not just ship when ready.
• Anchor this in your WMS so teams aren’t making manual calls on the dock.

Outcome: trucks show up when stores can actually convert pallets into shelf presence.

Promo readiness: where availability reputations are made (or lost)

9) Forecast uplift with discipline

• Don’t rely on a flat uplift factor. Use like-event history, weather overlays, and store-level elasticities.
• Identify display-driven volume vs price-driven volume; they behave differently.

10) Sequence POS and base stock

• Deliver base stock that lifts shelf capacity before POS lands.
• Where possible, use pre-built display units or outer carton configurations that speed execution.
• Confirm store back-room capability for bulky displays; if space is tight, stagger deliveries.

11) Protect the week

• Hold a cluster-level top-up pool for the first 48–72 hours of promo to rescue outperforming stores quickly.
• Stage spare booking slots; one rescue slot per day during the first promo week repays itself.

Outcome: promos start strong, stores don’t run dry by Thursday, and you avoid emergency loads.

Data hygiene: clean masters, clean moves, clean KPIs

12) Item masters and pack logic

• Standardise case counts, dimensions, weights, barcodes, and inner/outer pack relationships across ERP, WMS, and retailer systems.
• Lock carton-to-shelf conversion logic to prevent non-conforming planograms.

13) Exceptions taxonomy

• Use a common exception code set for late, partial, damaged, mislabeled, over-height, missing SSCC, missed booking, carrier-caused, DC-caused.
• Close exceptions in 24 hours and publish weekly Pareto charts (top 5 causes, corrective action owner, due date).

14) Control-tower visibility

• One dashboard: forecast accuracy by cluster, DIFOT to RDC, ASN accuracy, dock dwell, pallet conformance failure rate, store OSA (where available), and promo sell-through.
• Colour what you pay for: if you’re penalised for missed bookings or non-conformance, put it at the top.

Outcome: faster learning loops and fewer repeat errors.

People and cadence: operational rhythm that keeps shelves full

15) A weekly trading rhythm

• Monday: last week’s OSA and DIFOT review; plan changes for this week; promo check.
• Mid-week: exception stand-up (15 minutes); close aged issues; confirm rescue slots.
• Friday: next week VLAN (vessel loads, linehaul, allocations) and DC labour plan.

16) DC floor standards

• Pallet QA before wrap; photo archive with SSCC; label placement checks.
• A visible “RDC spec wall” at end of each line; spot-check every hour in promo weeks.

17) Sales–Supply alignment

• 30-minute sales & supply huddle at the start of each promo: uplift vs plan, store feedback, shelf execution blockers, and top-up decisions.

Outcome: fewer surprises and faster cross-functional decisions.

Metrics that actually move shelf availability

Track a short list, automate as much as possible, and tie a subset to partner payments:

• Forecast & allocation: WMAPE by cluster and SKU tier; allocation adherence (% stock to plan).
• Inbound reliability: DIFOT to RDC (P50/P90), dock dwell, pallet conformance fail %.
• Data integrity: ASN accuracy %, SSCC scan failures per 1,000 pallets, master data defect rate.
• Promo health: day-1 and day-3 sell-through vs plan; top-up response time.
• Shelf outcomes: OSA %, shelf-gap minutes per store (where supplied), lost sales estimate (signals).
• Cost & sustainability: cost-to-serve per case; packaging exceptions; tCO₂e per delivery (optional but useful for internal trade-offs).

A 30–60–90 day plan to lift DIFOT and OSA in Victoria

Days 1–30: Stabilise compliance and visibility

• Publish RDC spec cards and embed photo QA at pallet wrap; train crews.
• Shift SSCC creation to point of pallet completion; send ASNs at staging.
• Stand up a single dashboard for DIFOT, pallet conformance, dock dwell, and ASN accuracy.
• Lock a booking discipline: set target arrival bands by SKU tier and cluster.
• Run a Melbourne promo readiness clinic on your next two campaigns.

Days 31–60: Accelerate flow and close exceptions

• Re-cut DC waves to align with retailer booking windows and store shelf cycles.
• Introduce cluster-based allocations and a small protection pool for top-ups.
• Add shoulder or night route windows to protect morning shelf availability.
• Implement a 24-hour exception closure SLA; publish a weekly Pareto with root-cause owners.

Days 61–90: Embed resilience and scale

• Formalise surge carrier capacity and one rescue booking slot per day in promo week one.
• Pilot pre-built store packs or display units where allowed to speed floor execution.
• Add short-interval demand sensing (weather/events) for Melbourne metro to adjust allocations intra-week.
• Tie small performance fees to pallet conformance and on-time arrival tiers with carriers and pack partners.

Common pitfalls—and how to avoid them

1. Treating OSA as “a store problem.” If inbound pallets and ASNs are wrong or late, back-dock is already behind. Fix upstream.
2. Flat uplift factors. Use like-event and cluster logic; promo uplift is not uniform across Melbourne.
3. Late ASNs. If you transmit after departure, the RDC can’t plan labour or lanes. Send at staging.
4. One carrier, one time band. Diversify and use shoulder windows to protect day-1 shelf cycles.
5. Spec drift on pallets. Small misses trigger rework and delays. Photo QA plus a spec wall cuts failures fast.
6. KPI sprawl. Five to seven metrics, automated and reviewed weekly, beat twenty that no one owns.

How Trace Consultants can help

Melbourne OSA diagnostic (2–3 weeks)

• Map forecast-to-shelf hand-offs across your top 30 SKUs. Quantify where minutes and cases are lost: allocation rules, booking discipline, pallet conformance, dock dwell, and promo sequencing.

RDC compliance and ASN uplift

• Rewrite pallet and ASN SOPs, implement photo QA tied to SSCCs, and train DC teams. Put in place a 24-hour exception closure process with a standard code set.

Wave and route redesign

• Align DC pick waves and linehaul departures to retailer bookings and store shelf cycles. Introduce shoulder routes to protect morning availability.

Promo readiness engine

• Build cluster-based uplift models, cannibalisation logic, and a top-up protection pool with pre-booked rescue slots for week one.

Control-tower and KPIs

• Stand up a single dashboard covering DIFOT, pallet conformance, ASN accuracy, dock dwell, promo sell-through, and (where available) OSA. Automate data feeds and set weekly cadences.

Capability and cadence

• Coach your supply, DC, transport, and sales teams on the 30–60–90 plan; establish a durable weekly rhythm and close-loop CI.

Sustainability and cost-to-serve

• Reduce rework, packaging waste, and redundant kilometres with better conformance and route timing—lowering cost while protecting service.

Raising shelf availability in Victoria isn’t about throwing more inventory at the problem. It’s about precision: forecast by cluster, allocate with intent, build compliant pallets, send clean ASNs, hit the right booking windows, and time arrivals to store shelf cycles. Do those things consistently, measure them on one page each week, and availability rises without waste. That’s the kind of reliability retailers reward and customers notice.

‍

Port of Melbourne Playbook for FMCG: Cutting Import Lead Times (Reliably)

Melbourne FMCG supply chains win or lose on the boring bits: who owns the clock under your Incoterms, how containers are prioritised in the stack, whether your customs and biosecurity paperwork lands cleanly, how many VBS slots you secured before the vessel berthed, and whether you chose port-side devanning vs inland unpack based on the right constraints. This article breaks down a practical, Melbourne-specific playbook to remove avoidable days between the Port of Melbourne and your DCs in Derrimut, Truganina, Laverton North, or Dandenong South—and to keep you compliant with retailer RDC windows once stock is in hand.

Why lead time bloat creeps in (and how to spot it early)

Most lost days aren’t caused by a single failure. They accumulate through small frictions:

• Unclear ownership under Incoterms. If the shipper owns early milestones (FOB), but you still behave like you control them (as if CIF), hand-offs become grey zones.
• Late or error-ridden documents. Small mistakes in commercial invoices, packing lists, HS codes, or COO letters trigger biosecurity rechecks and customs queries.
• Stack position and container priorities. If your boxes sit at the back of a stack or you mix time-critical with non-urgent SKUs under one bill, you lose the ability to sequence pulls.
• VBS slot scarcity. Without a slot strategy, trucks wait, demurrage ticks up, and detention blows out.
• Unplanned devanning. Choosing inland unpack by default—even when dockside makes more sense—adds a day or two, and vice versa.
• Retailer compliance happening too late. If labelling/ASN/SSCC and pallet build don’t align to the retailer’s spec at the unpack, you pay later in rework and missed windows.

Diagnostic in one hour: Map the last four vessel calls. For each, note days between milestones: ATA/available, documents finalised, customs/biosecurity cleared, first slot booked, first lift, unpack complete, first DC receipt, first compliant ASN to retailer. You’ll see where the slippage lives.

Set the rules of the game: Incoterms and ownership

Pick terms that match your operating capability.

• If you can genuinely influence carrier choice, routing, and pre-advice quality, use FOB and take control from port of loading.
• If you lack bandwidth or leverage, CIF/CFR can work—but then renegotiate vendor KPIs: timeliness and accuracy of documents, VGM, and pre-advice quality should be contractually tied to payment.
• For urgent or sensitive lines (short shelf life, promo tie-ins), consider split strategies: 80% under standard terms, 20% under more controlled terms (FOB + premium routing) to protect uptime.

Make ownership explicit. Drop a one-page RACI into your SOP: who owns doc accuracy, who books slots, who triggers devanning, who raises carrier exceptions. Ambiguity is a schedule killer.

Choose lines and terminals with your dwell profile in mind

Not all services and terminals behave the same, and your product mix matters.

• Service frequency vs dwell risk. Higher frequency reduces variance. For high-velocity SKUs, pick lines with reliable rotation and shorter trans-ship risk.
• Terminal operating patterns. Understand typical stack runs, shift patterns, and cut-off behaviours so you can align slot strategies with actual lift rhythms.
• Container prioritisation. Work with your forwarder to tag hot boxes (promos, seasonal, launch items) under separate bills or as distinct groups, avoiding cross-contamination with slow lines.
• Box type choices. Don’t default to 40s if 20s give you better slot flexibility and yard handling speed for certain terminals and routes.

Practical move: Publish a “hot list” every week—container numbers, SKU family, devanning preference, required DC ETA—and share it with your forwarder and transport partners before the vessel arrives.

Win the paperwork: customs and biosecurity without the drama

Biosecurity (DAFF) and customs clearances often hinge on document precision and data lead time.

• Golden data pack from suppliers: HS codes validated, product descriptions standardised, COOs accurate, packing lists reconciled to SKUs and pallet counts, treatment certificates where needed.
• Pre-lodgement discipline: lodge entries and biosecurity docs as soon as vessel schedule is firm; aim for clearance before first slot is booked.
• Sensitive categories: for high-risk commodities (organics, timber packaging, certain food lines), pre-agree inspection protocols and ensure devanning sites meet inspection standards.
• Fallbacks: have an alternate inspection site ready (and compliant) so a failed first attempt doesn’t stall the chain.

Checklist to print: HS code table, DAFF risk flags by SKU, minimum doc set, inspection site list with hours and capacity, escalation contacts.

Slot smarter: Vehicle Booking System (VBS) tactics that actually work

VBS capacity is finite. Treat it like inventory.

• Book in waves, not drips. Secure slots as soon as availability opens in coherent blocks aligned to stack run windows.
• Prioritise “hot list” first. Pull priority boxes early, even if it means a partial run, to achieve meaningful DC receipts quickly.
• Diversify carriers. Relying on one carrier limits slot access. Maintain at least two partners with proven VBS performance.
• Night and shoulder plays. Off-peak slots can save a day in tight windows, especially if your unpack site operates late.
• Measure VBS hit rate and no-show discipline. Penalise avoidable no-shows; reward partners that consistently convert booked to lifted.

Pro tip: Create a “slot coverage” metric—slots secured vs boxes available by day—and review it every morning of a vessel week.

Devanning decisions: port-side vs inland unpack

There is no universal winner; match the method to your constraints.

Port-side devanning (“unpack at wharf”):

• Best for: high cube for the same DC, urgent promos, cold-chain risk, or when you need retailer-compliant pallet builds immediately.
• Pros: fewer kilometres moved in container form, faster first receipting, earlier QA; easier to fix labelling/pallet conformance before ASN.
• Cons: premium yard fees, limited rework space in peak periods, may require extended hours.

Inland unpack (third-party or DC):

• Best for: multi-DC allocations, mixed SKU containers that need complex sortation, or when your DC labour is under-utilised off-peak.
• Pros: better control over pallet spec, easier value-add (labelling, promo packs), consolidation to store waves.
• Cons: more touchpoints, higher risk of detention if unpack lags, reliance on inland slot availability.

Decision rule: If you need compliant pallets ready for a retailer booking inside 48 hours, bias port-side devanning—unless your inland facility is staffed and running extended hours to match.

First-mile from port to DC: choose your lane (and time of day)

Melbourne roadworks and commuter peaks aren’t going away. Plan routes and time bands.

• Western DCs (Derrimut/Truganina/Laverton North): short drays from port; use shoulder hours to avoid CBD peaks; pre-book weighbridges.
• South-East DCs (Dandenong South/Keysborough): consider night runs or early morning windows; evaluate rail shuttle options if viable for your volume profile.
• Back-to-back scheduling: align port lifts to DC receiving windows; don’t let trucks idle outside DC because the inbound plan ignored receiving capacity.
• Container prioritisation: send “hot list” to the closest DC first; mix FAKs and dedicated boxes to keep unload teams busy continuously.

Pallet build, labelling, and retailer compliance—do it once, do it right

Avoid rework at the DC or, worse, the retailer back dock.

• Pallet spec by retailer: height, weight, overhang, shrink wrap gauge, corner boards, and ticket position—lock this into your devanning SOP.
• SSCC and ASN discipline: generate SSCCs at the point pallets are complete and verified; transmit ASNs as soon as loads are staged.
• Mixed SKU strategy: for store-ready pallets, cluster by aisle/section where retailers allow; for RDC-ready, stick to single-SKU unless your vendor manual allows mixed.
• QA in the right place: inspect before stretch wrap; photograph and archive—especially for promo packs or fragile lines.

Simple rule: Retailer compliance starts at devanning. If you leave it to the DC, you’ve already lost a day.

Inventory triage: what gets cross-docked vs what gets stored

FMCG winners separate flow from stock.

• Cross-dock candidates: promo lines, short shelf life, high-velocity replenishment, or anything tied to a marketing date.
• Stock candidates: predictable base lines with decent cover, or items awaiting QA/testing hold.
• Shelf life logic: implement “minimum remaining life” gates per customer—if a pallet fails the gate, it routes to a different channel automatically.
• System flags: mark priorities in the WMS/TMS—urgent, aged, rework required—so DC teams aren’t guessing.

Retailer RDC bookings: align the whole chain backwards

If the goal is a Tuesday 06:00-08:00 slot at a retailer RDC, reverse the plan:

• Working back from slot time, fix the DC wave start, pallet completion time, devanning finish, first lift from port, and document clearance deadlines.
• Buffer real minutes, not vibes. Add fixed buffers where variance is non-negotiable (e.g., QA holds, carrier yard queue at peaks).
• Keep one uncommitted slot. A spare retailer slot per week for rescue loads is cheaper than chargebacks and lost promo sales.

Metrics that actually reduce days (and keep them down)

• Port-to-DC cycle: average and P90 days from ATA to first DC receipt.
• Docs quality: % entries cleared pre-berth; biosecurity rework rate.
• Slot coverage: slots secured vs boxes available by day on each vessel.
• Lift conversion: booked vs lifted per day; missed lift root causes.
• Devanning speed: hours from lift to pallets ready; P90 across partners.
• Retailer readiness: % pallets ASN-ready within 24 hours of lift; chargebacks per 1,000 pallets.
• Demurrage/detention: dollars per TEU; age profile of boxes on hand.

Review weekly. Publish a single dashboard; retire vanity metrics.

A 30-60-90 day plan for Melbourne FMCG importers

Days 1–30: Stabilise the basics

• Lock a golden data pack template with suppliers; enforce pre-lodgement.
• Select/add a second carrier for slot diversification.
• Publish the weekly hot list SOP (containers, devanning preference, required DC ETA).
• Stand up a vessel week huddle (logistics, DC, sales) with a seven-day look-ahead.

Days 31–60: Accelerate flow

• Pilot port-side devanning for two hot SKUs and measure time to ASN-ready pallets.
• Move to wave slot booking and set a slot coverage target (e.g., 80% of boxes slotted within 24 hours of ATA).
• Re-write retailer compliance at devanning work instructions; train the yard team and capture photo QA.

Days 61–90: Lock in resilience

• Formalise dual routing for one high-risk product family (alternate carrier/terminal plan).
• Implement P90 lead-time targets and CI routines with partners; tie a small fee share to beating P90.
• Build a control tower lite: one screen showing docs status, slot coverage, lift conversion, devanning speed, and retailer readiness.

Common pitfalls (and how to avoid them)

1. Treating VBS like an afterthought. It’s the heartbeat. Aim for block bookings and measure slot coverage each morning.
2. Mixing hot and cold freight. Separate bills/boxes so you can prioritise lifts without dragging dead weight.
3. Leaving retailer compliance to the DC. Build to spec at devanning; yank out a full day of rework.
4. One-carrier reliance. Diversify; even one extra partner changes your slot access and lift conversion.
5. Paper SOPs with no cadence. Vessel-week huddles, daily slot stand-ups, and a single cross-functional dashboard keep everyone honest.
6. Assuming inland unpack is always cheaper. Time is money in promos and fresh lines. Run the math weekly.

How Trace Consultants can help

• Import flow diagnostic (2–3 weeks). Map your last four vessel calls, quantify dwell by milestone, test devanning choices, and surface the exact days to remove.
• VBS & first-mile playbook. Design slot booking cadences, carrier diversification, route/time-band strategies, and “slot coverage” reporting you can run in half an hour a day.
• Devanning & compliance SOPs. Write and stand up port-side and inland unpack procedures that hard-wire retailer pallet specs, SSCC/ASN steps, and photo QA.
• Retailer readiness engine. Reverse-plan from the RDC slot to port lift; embed buffers and auto-alerts so the plan survives real-world variance.
• Control tower lite. One dashboard for docs status, slot coverage, lift conversion, devanning speed, DC wave starts, and ASN-ready pallets.
• Continuous improvement loop. Build partner scorecards (forwarder, transport, unpack site), run monthly CI gates tied to measurable reductions in P90 ATA-to-DC and chargebacks.
• Capability uplift. Train your planners and DC leads on the simple, repeatable behaviours that permanently shave days off your Melbourne inbound lane.

Cutting five–ten days from port-to-DC doesn’t require heroics. It requires clear ownership of the early steps (Incoterms and documents), a deliberate slot and lift strategy, devanning choices made with retailer compliance in mind, and a predictable first-mile plan tied to DC receiving reality. Measure the chain in the same way every week, keep your partners honest with simple scorecards, and shift the “boring bits” from fire-fighting to routine. That’s how Melbourne FMCG importers move faster—consistently, and without drama.

‍

Back-of-House Logistics in Major Infrastructure: Avoiding Hidden Costs and Operational Bottlenecks

Major projects live and die in the last hundred metres: the loading dock that can’t take peak volume, the central store that bottlenecks replenishment, the waste system that blocks corridors, the lifts that clash with guest flows, or a supplier roster that piles trucks into a single hour. These are supply-chain problems disguised as building problems. Get BOH wrong and you inherit higher operating costs, safety risks, and reputational damage; get it right and you unlock faster turns, cleaner floors, and calmer frontline teams.

This article provides a supply-chain first approach for Infrastructure Australia and the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts to embed BOH excellence into planning, business cases, design briefs, procurement, and commissioning.

What goes wrong when BOH is treated as an afterthought

• Undersized docks and marshalling: trucks queue on public roads; receiving teams work around the clock to clear peaks.
• Fragmented internal logistics: too many micro-stores at wards/offices, high walk time, and misplaced responsibility for replenishment.
• Lift and corridor conflicts: goods share circulation routes with visitors, creating safety and service issues.
• Waste backflows: bins occupy valuable space; collections clash with deliveries; contamination lifts disposal costs.
• Poor vendor choreography: all deliveries arrive at similar times; security checks become a choke point.
• Catalogue sprawl and SKU misuse: no standard packs or kitting; frequent substitutions; high write-offs.
• Data blind spots: no single source of truth for deliveries, inventory, or waste—leaving KPIs to spreadsheets.

A supply-chain framework for BOH design

1) Demand and flow forecasting

• Build hour-by-hour inbound/outbound profiles for each category: F&B, clinical/maintenance consumables, linen, parcels, equipment, waste streams.
• Distinguish steady vs event-driven demand (e.g., match-day spikes, flight banks, theatre lists).
• Translate flow to dock door requirements, staging area size, and MHE (materials handling equipment) needs.

2) Dock and yard design

• Size for 99th percentile peak with time-phased smoothing; allow separate lanes for perishables, high-security items, and waste.
• Provide off-street marshalling and a pre-check zone to reduce dock dwell.
• Integrate driver self-check-in and digital queue management; design for rigid and semi-trailer geometry as relevant.

3) Central stores and internal logistics

• Right-size staging and quarantine zones; ensure temperature-controlled rooms where required.
• Use zone picking and kitting for repeatable orders (theatre packs, event bars, room-turn carts).
• Standardise min/max and cycle rules; choose two-bin/kanban for fast-movers near point-of-use.
• Align freight lifts with goods routes; separate clean vs dirty flows; set turn-back areas for trolleys to avoid corridor deadlocks.

4) Waste, recycling and back-haul

• Map waste streams (general, co-mingled, organics, clinical, cardboard, e-waste, grease traps) with segregation points and container sizes.
• Design back-haul loops: full in, empty out.
• Provide wash-down bays and contamination controls; schedule collections to avoid peak inbound windows.

5) Security and compliance

• Segregate screening and seal-check lanes for higher-risk deliveries; maintain audit trails.
• Design biosecurity and food safety receiving procedures; integrate allergen labelling and temperature checks.

6) Catalogue discipline and kitting

• Rationalise SKUs; use ready-to-use kits for recurring tasks; set pack sizes to match storage and usage cadence.
• Apply the square-root rule to hold shared safety stock centrally while maintaining service for fast-movers.

7) Digital enablement

• Implement a dock booking system with time-stamped slots and vendor SLAs.
• Use barcode/RFID for receiving and internal transfers; track DIFOT, dwell time, and exceptions.
• Connect BOH systems to BMS/BAS for temperature, lift uptime, and energy insights.
• Stand up a control tower view: inbound load, internal replenishment status, waste capacity, exceptions.

Asset-specific BOH considerations

Airports and precinct transport hubs

• Align BOH with flight banks: demand spikes must not collide with security peaks.
• Provide airside vs landside segregation, with controlled cross-over and manifest integrity.
• Ensure cold-chain and high-value store rooms are within efficient lift distance to concession clusters.
• Design night replenishment to protect daytime passenger flows.

Hospitals and health campuses

• Balance central stores vs ward stock rooms; keep clinical corridors clear with scheduled top-ups.
• Theatre kits must align to procedure lists with sterile services capacity matched to lists and tray turns.
• Separate clean vs dirty flows religiously; plan for isolation surges.

Stadiums and large venues

• Build supply plans for ingress/interval/egress waves; pre-stage event-day kegs, cartons and merch near points of sale.
• Provide cage storage for high-value lines; route waste extraction around crowd egress.
• Enable rapid pop-up concessions with standard plug-and-play BOH packs.

Government office precincts & mixed civic assets

• Design parcel lockers and mail rooms sized to modern e-commerce loads; manage courier peaks with booking.
• Coordinate tenant fit-outs to protect core goods routes and lifts.
• Plan consolidated waste and recycling with shared dock governance.

Procurement and supplier choreography

• Move from activity-based input specs to outcome-based KPIs: DIFOT to dock, dock dwell <X minutes, internal replenishment cycle time, waste contamination <Y%.
• Set delivery windows by category; restrict “free-for-all” deliveries.
• Require pre-advice (ASN) and compliance to labelling and packaging standards.
• Use panel + mini-competition for repeat buys; reserve assured alternates for critical categories.
• Bake in continuous improvement clauses linked to queue reduction, route consolidation, packaging light-weighting, and waste diversion.

Commissioning and day-one readiness

• Treat BOH as a workstream in commissioning, not an operational afterthought.
• Run mock receiving days with live vehicles; time the full flow from gate to store to point-of-use to waste.
• Validate catalogues, storage plans, labels, kitting, trolley specs, and lift scheduling.
• Execute a vendor mobilisation plan: slot allocations, badges, induction, ASN/EDI testing, packaging standards.
• Staff and train a BOH control room for the first 90 days of operations.

Sustainability and Scope 3 gains via BOH

• Cut truck kilometres through delivery consolidation and dock slotting.
• Reduce packaging via reusable tote programs and standard carton sizes.
• Lift waste diversion with correct segregation points, signage, and collection cadence.
• Monitor energy loads in cold rooms and lift banks; smooth peaks with better replenishment timing.

Risk and resilience planning

• Map single points of failure: one dock, one lift bank, one compactor—design alternates and bypass routes.
• Hold contingency mobile storage and temporary marshalling plans for special events or outages.
• Maintain surge playbooks for weather, industrial action, or supplier failure; run annual drills.

KPIs that matter

• Inbound: booked vs attended slots, truck dwell time, DIFOT to dock, non-conformance rate.
• Internal moves: pick accuracy, replenishment cycle time, lift utilisation and uptime.
• Stock health: critical stockout rate, expiry/write-off value, kit completeness.
• Waste: contamination % by stream, compactor fullness at pickup, diversion rate.
• Cost & sustainability: cost-per-case handled, energy per pallet through cold room, tCO₂e per delivery.
• Safety: near-miss frequency, corridor block time, manual handling incidents.

Link payment to a subset of these and review monthly, with quarterly improvement gates.

90-day BOH plan for new or refurbished assets

Days 1–15: Diagnose and stabilise

• Validate demand profiles; run a capacity check on dock doors, lifts, staging.
• Clean catalogues; standardise labels, pack sizes, and kit lists for top 100 lines.
• Stand up a dock booking MVP and publish slot rules.

Days 16–45: Redesign flows and contracts

• Re-lay central stores; set min/max and cycle rules; implement two-bin where suitable.
• Re-write vendor guides: ASN format, packaging, slotting, safety, waste segregation.
• Let a consolidation lane for small-parcel and low-volume suppliers.

Days 46–90: Embed and prove

• Run full-dress rehearsals with suppliers; measure dwell, replenishment time, kit completeness.
• Launch control tower dashboards; automate exception alerts.
• Lock in CI projects (queue reduction, waste diversion, packaging redesign) with benefit share.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Design to average, not peak: always size to critical peak windows and smooth with slotting.
• One lift for all goods: separate dirty/clean flows and dedicate lift time bands.
• Too many point-of-use stores: centralise what you can; automate top-ups to reduce staff time and loss.
• No vendor governance: publish a vendor handbook; enforce slot compliance and labelling standards.
• Data last: define item master, ASN, and KPI schemas before go-live.
• Waste as an afterthought: plan streams, compactor capacity, and routes from day one.

How Trace Consultants can help

BOH strategy and functional brief development

• Translate business and service objectives into BOH functional requirements for docks, marshalling, stores, lifts, routes, waste rooms, and MHE.
• Produce demand and peak-flow models and convert them into space, door, and equipment specifications.

Design reviews and value engineering

• Run independent BOH design reviews at concept, schematic and detailed design stages.
• Optimise layouts for pick paths, trolley turning radii, lift adjacency, and segregation of clean/dirty flows.

Dock scheduling and vendor choreography

• Implement dock booking with slot rules by category; create vendor guides (ASN, labelling, packaging).
• Set up consolidation lanes for small suppliers to reduce truck movements.

Central stores, kitting and replenishment standards

• Design kitting programs for recurring service points (clinics, bars, rooms, theatres).
• Establish min/max, cycle rules, and two-bin replenishment; standardise carts and storage equipment.

Waste and sustainability optimisation

• Map streams, design segregation points and collection cadence; set up back-haul processes.
• Build initiatives for packaging reduction and waste diversion with measurable KPIs.

Digital control tower and data hygiene

• Stand up a BOH control tower: inbound schedule, dwell, DIFOT, replenishment times, waste levels, exceptions.
• Clean item masters and supplier IDs; enable barcode/RFID flows; integrate to BMS where useful.

Commissioning and day-one readiness

• Plan and run mock receiving days, training, vendor induction, and catalogue cut-over.
• Provide the first 90-day run book and on-site BOH control room support.

Contracting and KPI frameworks

• Draft outcome-based service KPIs and reporting packs for suppliers (DIFOT, dwell, kit completeness, contamination).
• Build continuous improvement pipelines with benefit-share structures.

Governance and assurance artefacts

• Prepare risk registers, logistics method statements, and operational readiness evidence suitable for executive and audit review.

Back-of-house logistics is the operating system of an asset. It determines how calmly and safely the front-of-house performs, and it sets the trajectory of whole-of-life cost. Treat BOH as a supply-chain design challenge from day one—forecast the peaks, size the docks and lifts, standardise catalogues and kits, choreograph suppliers, digitise the flows—and major infrastructure works the way it should: reliably, efficiently, and with fewer surprises.

‍

Ensuring Continuity of Care: Supply-Chain Resilience for the Department of Health & Aged Care

Why this matters (and why Canberra cares)

Every national program—immunisation, PBS medicines, pathology, Aged Care Quality Standards, emergency preparedness—depends on a supply chain that most people never see. When that chain is brittle, clinics reschedule, operating theatres re-sequence, residential facilities scramble for substitutes, and home-care visits run short on consumables. For the Department of Health and Aged Care (DoHAC), the job is not just setting policy and funding envelopes; it’s stewarding system-level reliability across thousands of sites and vendors under intense transparency and audit.

Four realities shape the task:

1. Demand is lumpy and local. Flu season, heatwaves, bushfires, and outbreaks drive sharp peaks that don’t respect procurement cycles.
2. Inventory is perishable and specialised. Cold-chain, sterility, traceability, and expiry windows make “just-in-case” stock expensive and risky.
3. Supply bases are concentrated. Single-source molecules, niche medical devices, and specialised services create choke points.
4. Care is mobile. Aged care increasingly happens in the community; logistics must reach the front room, not just the ward.

The solution is to treat health and aged care like any other mission-critical network: design for readiness, not just for price.

A practical supply-chain playbook for Health & Aged Care

1) Demand sensing and forecasting (beyond averages)

• Segment demand signals by care setting (acute, sub-acute, residential aged care, community) and by criticality tier (life-sustaining, safety-critical, elective).
• Use leading indicators—GP presentations, helpline spikes, school absenteeism, weather alerts—as early demand sensors for consumables and medications.
• Build service-level policies by tier (e.g., 99% for life-sustaining, 95% for safety-critical, 90% for elective) and back-solve to stocking and replenishment rules.
• Combine epidemiological curves with inventory age profiles to avoid large expiry write-offs when waves recede.

What good looks like: short-interval reforecasting during peaks; a control process that adjusts targets weekly without blowing probity or budgets.

2) Inventory strategy: where to hold, how much, and in what form

• Define decoupling points: what should be held at a national or state hub vs hospital central store vs ward vs community distribution partner.
• For cold-chain and high-value devices, prefer short cycle replenishment with robust vendor DIFOT and real-time tracking over large local safety stocks.
• Use the square-root rule judiciously to consolidate buffers—reducing total safety stock while preserving service for fast runners.
• Introduce ready-to-use kitting for theatres, wards, and home-care packs to compress preparation time and reduce pick errors.
• Ensure sterile services and reprocessing capacity is matched to theatre schedules; don’t let trays be the hidden bottleneck.

What good looks like: clear policy on what is centralised vs decentralised; measured reduction in expiries and substitutions; reliable kit availability at point of care.

3) Supplier base design and category strategies

• Treat recurring spend as strategic portfolios: pharmaceuticals, diagnostics & pathology consumables, PPE & infection control, clinical nutrition & catering, linen & laundry, waste & sterilisation services, community-care consumables, mobility aids, oxygen & respiratory, and facilities BOH.
• Rationalise catalogues where clinically safe; lock in assured alternates for critical items.
• Use outcome-based contracts for services (e.g., on-time sterilisation turnaround, linen hygiene compliance, catering nutrition standards) rather than activity counts.
• Write surge clauses with tested playbooks—pre-approved alternates, priority transport lanes, emergency pricing gates—to avoid improvised responses under pressure.
• Embed sustainability and supplier-development metrics (waste diversion, packaging reduction, fuel efficiency, local capability) in category scorecards.

What good looks like: fewer stockouts, fewer emergency buys, more predictable service performance with transparent reporting.

4) BOH logistics: the last ten metres matter

• Loading docks and central stores: schedule inbound waves to match put-away capacity; protect clinical corridors from spillover.
• Ward replenishment: shift from ad hoc pulls to hybrid two-bin/kanban or scanner-enabled top-ups with clear min/max and cycle rules.
• Theatre flows: kit-to-list alignment, instrument turnaround visibility, and a clean separation of sterile vs decontam flows.
• Residential aged care: weekly route design that minimises staff time spent on purchasing and receiving; standardised “pantry” kits tuned to resident profiles.
• Waste streams: compliant segregation and efficient back-haul reduce risk and cost; align collection windows to dock capacity and theatre schedules.

What good looks like: fewer intraday emergencies, cleaner corridors and storerooms, higher nursing time spent on care—not chasing stock.

5) Digital enablement and master data (the quiet work that pays back)

• Establish a single source of truth for item masters, supplier IDs, pack sizes, barcodes, and UoM; stop losing time to synonyms and mismatches.
• Use barcode scanning at pick/put-away and point of use where feasible; for community, pre-labelled kits are a simple win.
• Automate DIFOT and substitution reporting directly from supplier ASN/EDI feeds and transport telemetry.
• Make inventory age and lot traceability visible across the chain; align with pharmacovigilance and device trace requirements.
• Deploy low-code workflows for approvals, exceptions, and stock adjustments so probity lives in the process, not just in policy documents.

What good looks like: catalogue hygiene, clean transactions, traceable movements, and an audit trail without extra admin.

6) Workforce as a supply chain

• Treat rosters and home-care visits like a routing and capacity problem: match skill/time windows to demand waves while minimising travel and overtime.
• Build flex pools and cross-training plans for peak periods; keep agency reliance for true surge only.
• Link staff scheduling with material availability (e.g., vaccination sessions with cold-chain packs; wound-care visits with dressing kits) to avoid costly rescheduling.

What good looks like: fewer missed visits and cancellations, lower overtime, and better staff utilisation—without eroding care quality.

7) Risk, resilience, and sovereignty

• Map tier-2/3 exposures for critical categories; know where the real choke points sit.
• Build assured alternates and dual labelling where clinically permitted.
• Test scenario playbooks annually—cold-chain failure, supplier insolvency, regional transport interruption—so escalation pathways are known in advance.
• Track a small set of system health KPIs: critical stockout rate, substitution dependency, surge time-to-fill, and expiry write-offs.

What good looks like: no surprises when something breaks; a rehearsed response that protects continuity of care.

A 90-day plan the Department can sponsor

Days 1–15: Baseline and prioritise

• Catalogue hygiene scan; map top 20 critical items by clinical risk, volume, and supply concentration.
• Rapid review of BOH pain points across a representative hospital, a residential facility, and a community service hub.
• Stand up a control tower lite: a single dashboard for critical stockouts, substitutions, DIFOT, and inventory age.

Days 16–45: Stabilise the basics

• Implement min/max and cycle rules for top 50 ward items and community kits; trial two-bin in a high-variance ward.
• Negotiate surge clauses and assured alternates in 3–4 priority categories.
• Launch low-code exception workflows for substitutions, urgent buys, and stock adjustments—so the audit trail is built-in.

Days 46–90: Build resilience and embed

• Design the decoupling point strategy (what to centralise vs hold close to care).
• Pilot digital tracking for cold-chain consignments and automate DIFOT capture.
• Rehearse an annual surge test (table-top, then live mini-drill) across one city and one regional pathway.

By day 90 you have fewer substitutions, cleaner data, and a playbook that scales.

Metrics that actually protect care

• Continuity: critical stockout rate, substitution rate on critical lines, cancellation rate for clinical sessions due to supply issues.
• Responsiveness: time-to-fill surge orders, DIFOT to ward/home within service window, theatre kit completeness.
• Quality & safety: sterile tray turnaround time, cold-chain breach rate, lot traceability conformance.
• Efficiency: expired/write-off value, cost-per-episode kit, nursing time on supply tasks, overtime and agency percentage.
• Sustainability & governance: packaging reduction, waste segregation accuracy, audit exception closure time.

Tie a subset to supplier payments and internal performance compacts.

Common pitfalls to avoid

1. Over-centralising too fast. Central stock reduces buffers but can raise local risk if replenishment cadence and transport are weak. Pilot first.
2. Letting catalogue sprawl persist. Without item master discipline, all other analytics and controls are noisy.
3. Paper policies, no workflows. If staff can’t follow the process in the system they use daily, exceptions multiply and audit gaps appear.
4. Counting activities, not outcomes. Measure continuity of care at the edge, not just deliveries to the dock.
5. Ignoring BOH capacity. Docks, lifts, and storerooms set the ceiling on what the network can actually absorb.

How Trace Consultants can help

We specialise in the mechanics that turn policy into reliable care. Here’s how we support Agencies and funded providers:

1) Demand and inventory design

• Build service-level policies by clinical tier; model stock vs readiness curves to right-size safety stock.
• Introduce practical two-bin/kanban and kit standards for wards, theatres, and home-care.

2) Category strategies and supplier resilience

• Develop portfolio strategies (pharma, pathology consumables, PPE, linen, catering, sterilisation services, waste).
• Design assured alternates and surge clauses; consolidate where safe, dual-source where necessary.

3) BOH logistics and flow

• Redesign dock schedules, central store layouts, and ward replenishment patterns; balance sterile services capacity with theatre lists.
• Standardise community kit builds and route plans to cut staff time on procurement/receiving.

4) Digital enablement and data hygiene

• Stand up a control tower for critical KPIs (stockouts, substitutions, DIFOT, age); clean item masters and supplier IDs.
• Deploy low-code workflows for approvals and exceptions so probity is enforced in-flow.

5) Supplier performance and contracting

• Write outcome-based KPIs (e.g., kit completeness, sterile TAT, cold-chain integrity) with clear data specs and audit rules.
• Build payment logic that rewards reliability and responsiveness, not just box-ticking.

6) Mobilisation and change

• Support the practical cut-over: catalogue cleanse, labelling, storage standards, staff training, and supplier ramp plans.
• Coach operational leaders and supply teams so improvements outlast the project.

7) Governance and assurance

• Create lean artefacts—risk registers, decision logs, KPI annexures—that survive scrutiny without paralysing day-to-day operations.

If you want a low-risk start, we typically begin with a 6–8 week “stabilise and standardise” sprint across one hospital, one residential facility, and one community hub. You’ll see cleaner data, fewer substitutions, and a repeatable playbook you can scale purposefully—without theatrics, and without fabricating war stories.

Continuity of care is won in the last ten metres: a theatre list ready to go, a home-care nurse arriving with the right kit, a residential shift that doesn’t run out of gloves at 10pm. The Department’s influence is at system scale—but the system only works when the supply-chain details are right. Tighten the catalogue, clarify where stock lives, design the dock and the ward pull, and back it with clean data and clear contracts. Reliability follows.

‍

Procurement Excellence in Defence: Applying the Seven Levers to Multi-Billion Programs

Defence programs live or die on supply chain: spares, repair loops, forward distribution, contractor mobilisation, obsolescence, and data. Getting the contract signed is table stakes; getting aircraft, vessels, vehicles and ICT mission-ready, reliably, is the job. This piece reframes the classic seven procurement levers through a Defence supply-chain lens — demand governance, specification discipline, market design, commercial models, category management, supplier performance, and digital enablement — with practical moves you can deploy inside CASG and sustainment teams without compromising probity.

Why Defence procurement is different (from a supply-chain view)

• Decades-long demand: spares and upgrades outlast the initial purchase. Inventory and repair tactics matter more than the contract press release.
• Readiness over price: availability, MTBF, and turnaround times trump minor unit-price wins.
• Sovereign control: local repair pathways, dual sourcing, data escrow, and cyber-clean interfaces are strategic, not optional.
• Audit resilience: every decision must connect to evidence — requirements, should-costs, risk and benefit logic — and be reproducible.

The seven levers — adapted for Defence supply chains

1) Demand & requirements governance

Tighten the what before you touch the how.

• Convert “feature lists” into performance outcomes (availability hours, turnaround time, reliability thresholds).
• Time demand to IOC/FOC milestones and industrial capacity; don’t bunch orders into windows industry can’t meet.
• Use a joint requirements board (ops, engineering, logistics, finance) to filter gold-plating and right-size initial provisioning.

Supply-chain move: model readiness vs inventory with scenario curves (e.g., service level vs holding cost vs repair TAT) to set provisioning by effect, not guesswork.

2) Specification & standards optimisation

Over-spec drives single-source traps and long lead times.

• Keep interfaces and data models standard and modular; specify outcomes for subsystems wherever safe to do so.
• Challenge any spec that drags in bespoke tooling, non-standard fasteners, or fragile IT integrations.

Supply-chain move: run a “should-spec” review to identify the 10–20% of requirements that drive 50% of lead time, then reframe as performance clauses.

3) Market engagement & competition design

Shape the market before you buy from it.

• Start with a compressed supplier scan: map tier-2/3 constraints, local repair capability, and export-control risks.
• Use competitive prototyping and down-selects to de-risk schedule and test maintainability.
• Split or aggregate lots based on supply-base depth: split where competition is shallow; aggregate where economies of scale matter.

Supply-chain move: publish draft outcome KPIs and data requirements at RFT so bidders price the real operating model (stocking policies, telemetry, repair SLAs), not a guess.

4) Commercial models & pricing

Pay for capability, not paperwork.

• Use outcome-based sustainment (availability, TAT, mission-ready rates).
• Mix models: fixed price for known work, incentives for schedule and reliability, cost-plus with underrun share for true uncertainty.
• Anchor with should-cost/parametric models; pre-agree change pricing rules (FX, indexation, regulatory shifts).

Supply-chain move: fund a joint continuous improvement (CI) pipeline with benefit-share (e.g., 50/50) for VMI, repair-loop redesign, or transport routing changes.

5) Category management (the Defence portfolio view)

Treat recurring buys as portfolios: fuel & energy, uniforms/PPE, catering, MRO/rotables, ICT/cyber, facilities/BOH.

• Standardise terms via framework agreements; run mini-competitions for tasks to keep tension and speed.
• Rationalise SKUs where security permits; design dual sources for critical lines.
• Embed sustainability and sovereign metrics in the scorecard (local jobs, emissions per operating hour, waste diversion).

Supply-chain move: apply the square-root rule where feasible to cut network safety stock while maintaining service; back it with supplier-managed inventory on high-runner spares.

6) Supplier performance & SRM

Contracts don’t fly aircraft. People and processes do.

• Segment vendors (strategic/critical/managed) with governance cadences that match risk.
• Run joint improvement forums focused on leading indicators (engineering change cycle time, repair queue age) not just lagging KPIs.
• Test surge plans with table-top exercises — don’t discover your weak link during a real event.

Supply-chain move: link a portion of fee to operationally meaningful metrics (availability tiers, repair TAT bands, critical stockout avoidance) with auditable data feeds.

7) Process, data & technology enablement

Speed and probity can coexist if the workflow carries the governance.

• Digitise approvals and evaluations with low-code workflows that enforce delegation and capture artefacts.
• Stand up a lightweight procurement/sustainment control tower: requirements baselines, spend cube, risk register, supplier scorecards, and EVM in one place.
• Automate KPI ingestion from OEM/MRO systems and link directly to payment triggers.

Supply-chain move: implement a common data spec (IDs, versioning, telemetry schema) at contract signature to prevent “Excel islands” later.

Making outcome-based sustainment real

Outcome-based fails when outcomes are fuzzy or suppliers can’t influence the drivers. Make it workable by:

• Picking controllable outcomes (availability, TAT, MTBF).
• Agreeing data capture and audit before pricing.
• Pairing the outcome core with a time-and-materials lane for discrete upgrades/emergent work.

Whole-of-life economics (beyond the press release)

• Provision for spares, tools, training, obsolescence, and end-of-life handling from day one.
• Include BOH logistics in the model: loading docks, central stores, waste streams, and energy draw.
• Cost the disposal phase — data wiping, hazardous materials, demilitarisation — to avoid unfunded liabilities.

Risk, resilience, and sovereignty

• Map tier-2/3 exposures and export-control choke points; design assured alternates.
• Localise repair and calibration where practical; escrow critical data and documentation.
• Stress-test transport lanes and forward distribution to deployed locations.

Operating model: speed with probity

• Build integrated delivery teams (commercial, logistics, engineering, finance, end-user) with clear decision rights.
• Standardise evaluation packs and moderation so auditability is built-in, not bolted on.
• Use three lines of defence: project controls, central assurance, independent review.

Metrics that actually move readiness

• Availability & readiness: mission-ready hours, availability %, sortie generation rate.
• Reliability & maintainability: MTBF/MTTR, repair TAT, cannibalisation rate.
• Supply performance: DIFOT to base/forward locations, critical stockouts, supplier queue age.
• Commercial & CI: cost-per-ready hour, CI savings delivered vs plan.
• Sovereign & sustainability: AIC milestones achieved, emissions per operating hour (where relevant).

A practical 12-week sprint to embed the levers

Weeks 1–2: Mobilise, baseline demand/spend, map critical risks.
Weeks 3–4: Challenge requirements, build should-costs, define outcome KPIs/data spec.
Weeks 5–6: Supplier clinics, sovereign capacity check, tier-2/3 risk scan.
Weeks 7–8: Lotting strategy, evaluation model, probity plan, draft commercial structure.
Weeks 9–10: Release RFT, train evaluators, configure workflow & control tower.
Weeks 11–12: Negotiate to should-cost anchors, finalise KPI annexures & CI pipeline, assurance review.

Common failure patterns to avoid

1. Gold-plated specs → convert to outcomes; prototype to prove “good enough”.
2. One-shot tender → stage competition; test maintainability early.
3. Misaligned incentives → tie money to controllable operational outcomes.
4. Bespoke everything → standardise interfaces/data to keep options open.
5. Paper KPIs → define schemas and automate feeds; audit quarterly.
6. Through-life blind spots → price sustainment, BOH, and disposal from the start.
7. AIC as narrative → measurable milestones, reported like schedule.

How Trace Consultants can help

We focus on the unglamorous, operational levers that make capability work every day. No invented war stories — just the specific things we do:

Supply-chain strategy for readiness

• Translate platform performance goals into inventory, repair, and distribution settings (service-level targets, stocking policies, repair TAT design, forward-holding logic).
• Run scenario modelling (availability vs cost curves) to right-size initial provisioning and sustainment buffers.

Sovereign and supplier risk design

• Map tier-2/3 exposure, dual-source where necessary, and establish assured alternates for critical lines.
• Design local repair & calibration pathways and the data/doc escrow required to keep them viable.

Category strategies for Defence portfolios

• Fuel & energy, uniforms/PPE, catering, MRO/rotables, ICT & cyber, facilities & BOH: create portfolio playbooks (SKUs rationalised, sourcing lanes, KPI frameworks, sustainability/AIC metrics).

Outcome-based sustainment frameworks

• Define readiness KPIs and the data specification to support them (IDs, telemetry, audit trail).
• Build payment logic and CI benefit-share mechanisms tied to availability and TAT tiers.

Procurement & go-to-market execution (probity-ready)

• Lotting and evaluation design aligned to supply-base realities (including SME/consortia participation to support AIC).
• Should-cost/parametric models to anchor negotiations and manage change pricing.

Control tower & low-code workflow enablement

• Stand up a light control tower (requirements baseline, risk, supplier scorecards, EVM) and low-code approval/evaluation workflows that capture artefacts for audit.
• Automate KPI ingestion from OEM/MRO systems and link to payment triggers.

BOH logistics and facilities integration

• Design practical loading dock, central stores, waste and energy flows so sustainment logistics work on the ground — not just on paper.

Mobilisation & transition management

• Plan and run supplier mobilisation (ramp profiles, training, data migration, spares uplift, catalogue hygiene) to avoid capability dips at cut-over.

Assurance and “three lines” artefacts

• Produce the decision logs, evaluation records, risk registers, KPI annexures and delegate packs that withstand audit.

If you want this embedded in your program, we can start with a 6–8 week diagnostic focused on readiness KPIs, inventory & repair settings, supplier risks, and a rapid commercial model check — culminating in a concrete playbook and artefacts ready for governance.

The contract signature is the beginning, not the end. Defence procurement creates the scaffolding, but supply chain keeps capability alive — day after day, under audit and under pressure. Get the levers right, and you’ll see fewer stockouts, faster repair loops, cleaner data, and steadier readiness.

‍

The High Stakes of Defence Procurement

Few areas of government expenditure attract as much scrutiny as Defence procurement. Australia invests tens of billions annually into equipping, sustaining, and supporting its Defence Force. From submarines to fighter jets, uniforms to rations, every contract carries not only financial weight but also political and strategic implications.

When Defence procurement goes well, it underpins Australia’s national security and supports sovereign industry development. When it goes wrong, the consequences make headlines: cost blowouts, capability delays, and parliamentary inquiries.

Against this backdrop Defence Procurement Excellence is not simply about securing the best price, it’s about delivering reliable capability, building sovereign resilience, ensuring taxpayer accountability, and enabling long-term strategic advantage.

This article explores three key levers for achieving procurement excellence in Defence:

1. Applying the seven levers of procurement to Defence programs.
2. Embedding outcome-based contracting and performance frameworks.
3. Elevating category management for common Defence supplies.

Why Defence Procurement Matters

Scale and Complexity

Defence procurement is vast in scale and scope. From multi-decade programs like AUKUS submarines to the daily purchase of catering and uniforms, the Defence supply chain touches every aspect of capability. Complexity arises from:

• International partnerships and security agreements.
• Integration with Defence industry and sovereign manufacturing.
• Long lead times for capital acquisitions.
• Compliance with strict regulatory and security frameworks.

Political Sensitivity

Defence procurement decisions often have diplomatic and political implications. Choosing suppliers can affect alliances, regional strategy, and sovereign capability development. Cost overruns or underperformance quickly become matters of public debate and political accountability.

Strategic Impact

Beyond the numbers, procurement choices directly influence Defence’s ability to respond to threats, sustain readiness, and project power. Procurement is therefore a national security enabler, not just a financial process.

Applying the Seven Levers of Procurement to Defence

The seven levers of procurement, widely recognised in industry, are equally relevant to Defence. When systematically applied, they create measurable savings, enhance value, and reduce risk.

1. Demand Management

Defence Context: Optimising demand is critical in environments where “gold-plating” (specifying more than necessary) often inflates costs. For example, rationalising specifications for uniforms, vehicles, or IT equipment can significantly reduce procurement complexity and expense.
Levers in Action:

• Challenge requirements: differentiate between mission-critical and “nice to have.”
• Standardise specifications across Defence branches to unlock economies of scale.

2. Specification and Scope Management

Defence Context: Overly complex or bespoke specifications are common in Defence programs. Simplifying specifications without compromising capability can reduce costs and risks.
Levers in Action:

• Use modular designs for assets like ships or vehicles.
• Apply commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) solutions where appropriate.

3. Supplier Base Management

Defence Context: Defence often relies on a limited pool of suppliers, sometimes creating dependency risks.
Levers in Action:

• Broaden supplier engagement through competitive processes.
• Invest in sovereign capability to reduce reliance on international partners.
• Rationalise supplier bases in non-sensitive categories (e.g., catering, office supplies).

4. Process Improvement

Defence Context: Procurement processes can be slow and bureaucratic. Streamlining approvals and digitising workflows accelerates delivery and reduces administrative costs.
Levers in Action:

• Deploy low-code procurement workflow tools for faster decision-making.
• Standardise contract templates and performance metrics.

5. Volume Leveraging

Defence Context: Many Defence categories—fuel, catering, uniforms—are highly standardised and benefit from aggregated demand.
Levers in Action:

• Aggregate demand across Defence sites nationally.
• Leverage joint procurement with allied forces for bulk purchases.

6. Price Leverage

Defence Context: Defence is often a “price taker” for niche or high-tech capabilities. However, in areas with competitive supply bases, negotiation is key.
Levers in Action:

• Benchmark rates against comparable sectors.
• Use multi-year contracts to secure better terms.

7. Relationship Management

Defence Context: Long-term programs require robust supplier relationships. Poor collaboration leads to disputes and project delays.
Levers in Action:

• Establish structured supplier relationship management (SRM) frameworks.
• Share performance data transparently to drive continuous improvement.

Outcome-Based Contracting and Performance Frameworks

Moving Beyond Inputs and Activities

Traditional Defence contracts often specify activities (e.g., hours worked, services delivered) rather than outcomes. This creates inefficiency and misalignment, as suppliers focus on fulfilling the contract rather than delivering strategic value.

Outcome-based contracting (OBC) shifts the focus to results:

• Did the supplier deliver capability on time and within budget?
• Did the service improve readiness or resilience?
• Did the asset achieve agreed levels of uptime, safety, or compliance?

Benefits of OBC in Defence

1. Alignment with Strategic Goals: Suppliers are incentivised to deliver outcomes that matter to Defence capability.
2. Cost Efficiency: Payment is tied to value delivered, reducing waste.
3. Innovation Encouragement: Suppliers are rewarded for finding better, more efficient solutions.

Performance Frameworks

Embedding performance frameworks ensures contracts deliver results:

• KPIs and Metrics: On-time delivery, asset availability, cost performance, safety, and compliance.
• Balanced Scorecards: Combine financial, operational, and strategic metrics.
• Incentive Structures: Link payments to performance, with penalties for underperformance.

Practical Example

• Fuel Supply Contracts: Rather than paying for litres delivered, contracts could focus on guaranteed availability at bases, resilience under crisis conditions, and sustainability metrics (e.g., biofuel integration).
• Maintenance Services: Instead of paying for hours worked, contracts could link payment to uptime of critical equipment or vehicles.

Category Management for Common Defence Supplies

Why Category Management Matters

While high-value projects like submarines dominate headlines, everyday categories—fuel, catering, uniforms, MRO (maintenance, repair, and operations)—represent a large share of Defence’s spend. Poor management in these areas accumulates into millions in waste annually.

Key Categories and Opportunities

1. Fuel

• One of Defence’s largest recurrent costs.
• Opportunities: consolidate suppliers, negotiate long-term supply agreements, and integrate carbon-reduction strategies.

2. Uniforms and Apparel

• Defence requires uniforms across multiple branches and roles.
• Opportunities: standardise specifications, streamline supplier bases, and explore sustainable materials.

3. Catering and Food Services

• Essential for bases, deployments, and exercises.
• Opportunities: aggregate demand across sites, modernise supply chains, and adopt centralised production kitchens.

4. MRO Supplies

• Covers everything from spare parts to tools.
• Opportunities: rationalise SKUs, leverage predictive analytics for inventory optimisation, and negotiate aggregated contracts.

Category Management Framework for Defence

1. Spend Analysis: Understand baseline expenditure and supplier fragmentation.
2. Market Analysis: Assess supplier capabilities, market dynamics, and sovereign considerations.
3. Category Strategy Development: Define levers to apply—aggregation, standardisation, supplier partnerships.
4. Execution: Implement sourcing strategies, negotiate contracts, and establish governance.
5. Performance Management: Monitor and refine through KPIs, SRM, and continuous improvement.

ROI of Procurement Excellence in Defence

Tangible Benefits

• Cost Savings: Systematic application of levers and category management can deliver savings of 10–20% in common categories.
• Reduced Risk: Broader supplier engagement reduces dependency on single vendors.
• Improved Efficiency: Digitised processes shorten procurement cycles and improve auditability.

Intangible Benefits

• Capability Readiness: Reliable procurement ensures Defence is mission-ready.
• Sovereign Resilience: Stronger domestic supplier bases improve self-reliance.
• Public Trust: Demonstrating accountability and value for taxpayer funds builds credibility.

Practical Steps for Defence Agencies

1. Conduct a Procurement Diagnostic
   • Map current spend, suppliers, and processes to identify quick wins.
2. Embed Outcome-Based Frameworks in New Contracts
   • Pilot OBC in categories like catering or maintenance to test performance-linked models.
3. Invest in Category Management Capability
   • Establish dedicated category managers for fuel, catering, uniforms, and MRO.
4. Adopt Digital Procurement Tools
   • Use low-code/Power Apps platforms for workflow automation, supplier performance dashboards, and demand forecasting.
5. Engage Independent Advisors Early
   • Objective partners like Trace Consultants bring cross-sector expertise and fresh thinking to complex Defence procurement challenges.

Procurement as a Strategic Enabler

Defence procurement is not simply about managing contracts—it’s about safeguarding Australia’s strategic future. Mistakes cost billions, delay capability, and erode public trust. Excellence, on the other hand, unlocks resilience, efficiency, and accountability.

By systematically applying the seven levers of procurement, embedding outcome-based contracting, and elevating category management, Defence can transform procurement into a strategic enabler of national security.

The question for Defence leaders is this:

Are your procurement practices delivering true capability outcomes, or just ticking the compliance box?

Ready to lift performance and accountability in Defence procurement? Contact Trace Consultants to explore how we can support your next program.

For government agencies, supply chains are the backbone of critical operations, from delivering healthcare and infrastructure to supporting defence and emergency services. However, the vulnerabilities within these supply chains are often far less obvious than they seem. While disruptions like natural disasters or trade restrictions are visible risks, subtler threats—such as hidden supplier dependencies, cybersecurity gaps, or regulatory loopholes—can pose equally significant challenges. These hidden vulnerabilities can undermine government services, erode public trust, and increase costs, making it essential for government leaders to identify and address them proactively.

Australia’s unique context, including its geographic isolation, reliance on global trade, and exposure to climate risks, amplifies the need for robust supply chain management. For government leaders, understanding and mitigating these less obvious vulnerabilities is critical to ensuring resilience, service delivery, and value for money. This article explores why supply chain vulnerabilities may be harder to detect than you think, offering practical strategies to strengthen government operations. It also highlights how Trace Consultants can support government agencies in building resilient, transparent, and efficient supply chains.

The Hidden Nature of Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

Supply chain vulnerabilities are not always as straightforward as a port closure or a supplier going bankrupt. Many risks lurk beneath the surface, embedded in complex networks or obscured by outdated processes. Reasons why these vulnerabilities are less obvious and why they matter for government operations include:

1. Complex and Fragmented Supply Networks

Modern supply chains are intricate, often spanning multiple countries, suppliers, and intermediaries. Government departments may lack visibility into second- or third-tier suppliers, creating blind spots where risks like quality issues or modern slavery violations can develop unnoticed.

2. Over-Reliance on Single Suppliers

Dependence on a single supplier or region for critical goods—such as medical equipment, defence technology components, or raw materials (see the AdBlue shortage of late 2021)—can seem manageable until a disruption occurs. These dependencies are often hidden in subcontracted or outsourced arrangements.

3. Cybersecurity Gaps

Digital supply chains rely on interconnected systems, making them vulnerable to cyberattacks. A breach in a supplier’s system or a third-party logistics provider can compromise sensitive data or disrupt operations, often without immediate detection.

4. Regulatory and Compliance Risks

Government supply chains must adhere to strict procurement regulations and ethical standards. Non-compliance by a supplier, such as failing to meet environmental or labour standards, can lead to legal and reputational risks that are not immediately apparent.

5. Climate and Environmental Risks

Australia’s exposure to climate events like bushfires, floods, and cyclones can disrupt supply chains. Subtle vulnerabilities, such as reliance on transport routes prone to weather disruptions, may go unnoticed until a crisis strikes.

6. Data Silos and Lack of Integration

Disparate systems across government departments can hinder visibility and coordination, masking vulnerabilities like inventory shortages or inefficiencies in procurement processes.

7. Human Factors

Workforce shortages or a lack of expertise in supply chain management can create vulnerabilities, such as errors in supplier vetting or inadequate risk assessments, which may not be evident until a disruption occurs.

These hidden vulnerabilities can have significant consequences, from delayed service delivery to increased costs and compromised public safety. For government leaders, identifying and addressing them is critical to maintaining operational resilience and delivering value for money.

Why Hidden Vulnerabilities Matter for Government

Government supply chains underpin essential services, and any disruption can have far-reaching impacts:

• Operational Continuity: Vulnerabilities can delay the delivery of critical goods, such as medical supplies or infrastructure materials, affecting public services.
• Public Trust: Failures in supply chain management can erode confidence in government efficiency and accountability.
• National Security: In sectors like defence, hidden vulnerabilities in supply chains can compromise readiness and security.
• Cost Efficiency: Unaddressed risks can lead to cost overruns, undermining value for money and straining public budgets.
• Regulatory Compliance: Non-compliance with procurement or ethical standards can result in legal penalties and reputational damage.

Given Australia’s reliance on global supply chains and its unique environmental and geopolitical challenges, government leaders must prioritise proactive risk management to uncover and mitigate these hidden vulnerabilities.  

Strategies to Identify and Address Hidden Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

To strengthen supply chains and ensure resilience, government leaders can adopt the following strategies to uncover and address hidden vulnerabilities:

1. Comprehensive Supply Chain Mapping

Mapping the entire supply chain, including second- and third-tier suppliers, reveals hidden dependencies and potential risks.

Actionable Steps:

• Conduct end-to-end supply chain audits to identify all suppliers and subcontractors.
• Use digital tools to visualise supply chain networks and pinpoint vulnerabilities.
• Regularly update supply chain maps to reflect changes in supplier relationships or global conditions.

Outcome: Increased visibility reduces blind spots, enabling proactive risk management and steps to improve resilience.

2. Strengthening Governance Frameworks

Robust governance ensures accountability, compliance, and alignment with government priorities, helping to identify and mitigate hidden risks.

Actionable Steps:

• Develop clear procurement policies that require transparency and compliance from all suppliers.
• Establish cross-departmental governance committees to oversee supply chain risk management.
• Implement performance metrics to monitor supplier reliability and regulatory adherence.

Outcome: Strong governance uncovers compliance risks and ensures resources are used efficiently, delivering value for money.

3. Leveraging Technology for Transparency

Digital tools, such as AI, blockchain, and IoT, provide real-time visibility into supply chains, helping to detect hidden vulnerabilities.

Actionable Steps:

• Deploy supply chain management software to track goods, services, and supplier performance.
• Use blockchain to create secure, transparent records of supplier transactions and compliance.
• Implement IoT sensors to monitor inventory and logistics conditions, identifying potential disruptions.

Outcome: Enhanced transparency reduces inefficiencies and risks, ensuring operational continuity and cost-effective outcomes.

4. Enhancing Cybersecurity Measures

Digital supply chains require robust cybersecurity to protect against hidden threats that could disrupt operations or compromise data.

Actionable Steps:

• Implement encryption and access controls for supply chain data shared with suppliers.
• Conduct regular cybersecurity audits of suppliers and third-party providers.
• Train staff and partners on cyber hygiene and data protection best practices.

Outcome: Strong cybersecurity prevents costly disruptions, safeguarding capability and public funds. ‍

5. Building Local Supply Chain Capacity

Reducing reliance on global suppliers by strengthening local capacity mitigates hidden risks associated with international dependencies.

Actionable Steps:

• Partner with Australian suppliers to develop local alternatives for critical goods.
• Invest in regional logistics hubs to improve distribution resilience.
• Support workforce development to address skill shortages in supply chain management.

Outcome: Local capacity reduces exposure to global disruptions, enhancing resilience and value for money.

6. Fostering Ethical and Sustainable Procurement

Transparency into supplier practices ensures compliance with ethical and environmental standards, reducing hidden risks like reputational damage.

Actionable Steps:

• Conduct supplier audits to verify compliance with labour, environmental, and ethical standards.
• Adopt green procurement policies to prioritise sustainable suppliers.
• Publish transparency reports to demonstrate commitment to responsible practices.

Outcome: Ethical procurement builds resilient, compliant supply chains, delivering long-term value.

7. Scenario Planning and Crisis Preparedness

Scenario planning helps identify hidden vulnerabilities by modelling potential disruptions and testing response strategies.

Actionable Steps:

• Use predictive analytics to simulate disruptions like supplier failures or climate events.
• Develop crisis response plans with clear roles for supply chain management.
• Maintain strategic reserves of critical goods to mitigate disruptions.

Outcome: Preparedness minimises the impact of disruptions, ensuring continuity and cost-effective operations.

8. Stakeholder Collaboration

Collaboration with suppliers, industry partners, and other government departments enhances visibility and strengthens supply chain resilience.

Actionable Steps:

• Establish supplier codes of conduct to align expectations and ensure transparency.
• Create stakeholder forums to share best practices and address vulnerabilities.
• Engage with industry bodies to stay informed on global supply chain trends.

Outcome: Collaboration reduces hidden risks and fosters resource sharing, delivering cost-effective outcomes.

The Future of Supply Chain Resilience

The future of government supply chains lies in embracing innovation, collaboration, and proactive risk management to address hidden vulnerabilities.

Digital Transformation

Technologies like AI, blockchain, and digital twins will enhance supply chain visibility, enabling early detection of vulnerabilities and more efficient operations.

Sustainable Supply Chains

Adopting circular supply chain models and sustainable procurement practices will reduce long-term risks and costs, aligning with public expectations.

Collaborative Ecosystems

Strengthening partnerships with local suppliers, industry bodies, and other government departments will enhance visibility and resilience, addressing hidden risks.

Adaptive Risk Management

As global and environmental challenges evolve, government departments must adopt adaptive risk management strategies to stay ahead of emerging vulnerabilities.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we specialise in helping Australian Government departments uncover and address hidden supply chain vulnerabilities. Our tailored solutions enhance resilience, transparency, and efficiency, ensuring operational continuity and value for money.  

Why Choose Trace Consultants?

• ‍Government Expertise: Our deep understanding of Australian government operations ensures tailored, effective solutions. ‍
• Comprehensive Support: From strategy to implementation, we provide end-to-end guidance to strengthen your supply chain. ‍
• Proven Results: Our track record with government clients demonstrates our commitment to excellence.

Conclusion

The vulnerabilities in your supply chain may not be as obvious as you think, but their impact can be profound. For Australian government departments, hidden risks like supplier dependencies, cybersecurity gaps, and regulatory non-compliance can disrupt operations, escalate costs, and erode public trust. By adopting strategies such as supply chain mapping, robust governance, and technology-driven transparency, government leaders can uncover and address these vulnerabilities, ensuring resilience, compliance, and value for money.

Trace Consultants is your trusted partner in this journey. With expertise in supply chain audits, governance, and transparency, we help you build resilient, efficient supply chains that deliver critical outcomes.

In an uncertain world, addressing hidden supply chain vulnerabilities is a commitment to operational excellence and public trust. Partner with Trace Consultants to build a future-ready supply chain that stands up to any challenge — contact us today

CFOs across Australia and New Zealand are under intense pressure. Supply chain volatility, labour shortages, and complex compliance requirements are forcing organisations to find new ways to deliver efficiency while maintaining service standards.

Managing supply chain operations and workforce planning is especially challenging in industries such as aged care, retail, and logistics — where vast geographic distances, tight margins, and regulatory obligations add extra complexity.

For CFOs, data-driven decision-making is no longer optional — it’s essential. That’s why many organisations are turning to Microsoft’s Power Platform, particularly Power Automate and Power BI, to reshape how they manage costs, resources, and performance.

These tools enable CFOs to automate repetitive processes, integrate fragmented systems, and generate real-time insights. At Trace Consultants, we’ve seen firsthand how they transform supply chain operations and workforce planning — empowering leaders to cut costs, strengthen compliance, and drive resilience.

The Challenges Facing CFOs in ANZ

For finance leaders, balancing supply chain operations and workforce planning often feels like walking a tightrope. You need to control costs, maintain compliance, and align resources with strategy — all while navigating disruption.

Key pain points include:

• Fragmented Data – Information spread across rostering, inventory, and finance systems makes it difficult to get a single, reliable view.
• Manual Processes – Time-consuming tasks like scheduling, approvals, and reporting drain resources and increase the risk of error.
• Overtime and Agency Costs – Inefficient rostering often drives unnecessary overtime and reliance on agency staff.
• Compliance Risks – Stricter regulatory environments demand real-time visibility and accountability.
• Forecasting Challenges – Poor demand planning can cause stockouts, overstocking, or staff shortages — all of which impact service levels and profitability.

These challenges hit both the bottom line and long-term organisational resilience. But this is where Power Automate and Power BI step in as scalable, practical solutions.

How Power Automate and Power BI Address These Challenges

Power Automate: Streamlining Processes and Reducing Manual Effort

Power Automate is a low-code platform that enables organisations to automate routine processes, create intelligent workflows, and act as a data pipeline across disconnected systems.

For CFOs, it delivers:

• Workflow Automation – Streamlines tasks such as purchase order approvals, shift scheduling, and compliance checks.
• Systems Integration – Connects platforms like SAP, Oracle, and HR systems for seamless data flow.
• Error Reduction – Automates data handling, improving reporting accuracy and reducing compliance risks.
• Agility – Real-time triggers (e.g. low stock alerts) enable rapid responses to change.

In practice, this means a rostering system can trigger automatic compliance checks, or inventory thresholds can initiate purchase orders — saving time, reducing error, and improving control.

Power BI: Real-Time Insights and Strategic Decision-Making

Power BI transforms raw data into meaningful, interactive dashboards. For CFOs, it provides:

• Consolidated Visibility – Integrates data from payroll, rostering, and inventory into a single view.
• Real-Time Analytics – Tracks KPIs such as overtime, staff utilisation, and service levels instantly.
• Predictive Forecasting – Uses AI-driven analytics to model demand and optimise resources.
• Custom Dashboards – Tailored to financial and operational KPIs that matter most to the business.

Together, Power Automate and Power BI combine automation with intelligence, giving CFOs visibility and control across both supply chain and workforce planning.

Real-World Example: Transforming Aged Care with Power BI

Trace Consultants recently partnered with a leading aged care provider in Australia to address challenges in workforce planning. The organisation faced escalating overtime costs, heavy reliance on agency staff, and fragmented data across multiple systems.

What We Found

• Rostering, payroll, and compliance systems didn’t integrate, creating blind spots.
• Overtime costs went unchecked due to lack of visibility.
• Leave tracking was manual and prone to error.
• Service levels varied, affecting resident care quality and compliance.

The Solution

We designed and delivered a Power BI workforce allocation dashboard, integrated through Power Automate data pipelines. Key features included:

• Real-time overtime tracking with alerts for unusual spikes.
• Staff utilisation metrics to highlight inefficiencies in rostering.
• Agency staff reporting to reduce dependency and costs.
• Automated leave management to ensure compliance with award conditions.
• Service-level dashboards to monitor staff-to-resident ratios.

What Changed

• Overtime costs fell as managers gained real-time visibility and control.
• Agency reliance dropped, reducing unnecessary labour expense.
• Compliance improved with automated leave tracking and risk alerts.
• Service quality strengthened through consistent staffing visibility.
• CFOs gained actionable insights linking workforce decisions directly to financial outcomes.

This project proved how Power Automate and Power BI can turn fragmented data into a single source of truth — enabling CFOs to act with confidence.

Why These Tools Are Game-Changers for CFOs

For ANZ CFOs, Power Automate and Power BI offer strategic advantages:

1. Cost Control – Identify and eliminate inefficiencies in overtime, agency spend, and supply chain processes.
2. Scalability – Tailor and expand solutions without costly IT overhauls.
3. Compliance & Risk – Ensure adherence to regulatory requirements with automated workflows and transparent reporting.
4. Data-Driven Strategy – Replace manual reporting with interactive dashboards that link decisions to outcomes.
5. Agility – Respond faster to labour shortages, supply disruptions, and regulatory changes.

In industries with tight margins and high accountability, these tools are no longer optional — they are essential.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we specialise in helping CFOs across Australia and New Zealand harness the power of Microsoft’s Power Platform to transform supply chain and workforce planning.

Our approach includes:

1. Diagnostic Assessment – Identifying inefficiencies, data gaps, and automation opportunities.
2. Tailored Solutions – Designing Power Automate workflows and Power BI dashboards to match your business needs.
3. Seamless Implementation – Guiding integration, training teams, and ensuring smooth adoption.
4. Ongoing Optimisation – Monitoring results, refining processes, and adapting as needs evolve.
5. Industry Expertise – Bringing proven experience across aged care, retail, logistics, and other key ANZ sectors.

By combining operational expertise with technology implementation, we ensure measurable outcomes — not just new tools.

The Future of Supply Chain and Workforce Planning

Looking ahead, CFOs can expect technology to play an even bigger role:

• AI-driven forecasting will sharpen demand planning.
• Predictive rostering will address labour shortages.
• Automation at scale will cut costs while ensuring compliance.
• Sustainability tracking will integrate into everyday planning.

For ANZ organisations, the winners will be those who combine digital tools with smart change management and industry expertise.

Conclusion

Power Automate and Power BI are transforming how CFOs manage supply chain operations and workforce planning across Australia and New Zealand. They streamline processes, deliver real-time visibility, and enable smarter, faster decisions.

But tools alone are not enough. Success requires practical implementation, cultural adoption, and ongoing optimisation. That’s where Trace Consultants makes the difference.

Ready to unlock efficiency and control with Power Automate and Power BI?
Trace Consultants helps CFOs across ANZ streamline operations, cut costs, and drive resilience. Contact us today to start your transformation.

Across Australia and New Zealand, AI has quickly shifted from hype to reality. Supply chain teams are trialling demand forecasting algorithms that outperform traditional models. Procurement functions are using AI to automate spend analysis, flag risks in supplier contracts, and benchmark rates in near real time. For leaders, the promise of AI is compelling: reduced costs, greater agility, and sharper decision-making.

But here’s the catch. Technology alone does not deliver outcomes. AI tools may be smarter, faster, and more capable than past systems, but their value hinges on people and processes adapting around them. This makes change management – the structured approach to transitioning people, processes, and organisations – not less important in an AI-enabled world, but far more critical.

In fact, many organisations underestimate how disruptive AI can be. Unlike past IT projects, which largely digitised existing processes, AI changes how work is done, who does it, and what decisions they make. That’s why supply chain and procurement projects involving AI must now be approached with a much greater emphasis on change management, stakeholder engagement, and culture building.

The Shift AI Brings to Supply Chain and Procurement

AI is reshaping supply chain and procurement in several ways that directly impact people, roles, and ways of working.

1. Decision-Making Moves Closer to the Algorithm

Traditional supply chain planning relied on human analysts, planners, and category managers to make decisions based on data extracts and reports. With AI, models can generate forecasts, optimise networks, or suggest suppliers in seconds. This shifts decision-making closer to the algorithm, requiring humans to trust, validate, and act on recommendations.

2. Roles and Skills Are Changing

Procurement professionals are spending less time crunching data in Excel and more time interpreting insights, challenging assumptions, and engaging suppliers. Supply chain planners are moving from “manual adjustment” roles to scenario planners and risk managers. These are significant shifts in job scope, capability, and mindset.

3. Pace of Change Is Faster

AI deployments are not once-off system upgrades. They evolve rapidly as models are retrained, new data sources are added, and business needs shift. This constant iteration creates a rolling change environment rather than a “set and forget” model.

4. Expectations Are Higher

Executives expect AI projects to deliver tangible ROI quickly – sometimes within months, not years. Without effective change management, adoption lags, outcomes stall, and the technology is unfairly labelled a failure.

Why Change Management Matters More Than Ever

In this AI-driven landscape, change management isn’t a “nice to have.” It’s the difference between a successful transformation and another costly IT project that never delivers.

Driving Adoption and Trust

AI outputs can feel like a “black box” to users. Without explanation, teams may distrust recommendations, ignore alerts, or revert to old ways of working. Change management helps build confidence through education, transparency, and ongoing engagement.

Reshaping Roles and Responsibilities

AI doesn’t eliminate people; it redefines their value. Procurement officers may move from tactical purchasing to supplier strategy. Planners may shift from forecasting to risk scenario testing. Structured change management ensures role clarity, capability building, and alignment of expectations.

Embedding New Ways of Working

AI success relies on behavioural shifts: managers using dashboards daily, buyers trusting automated alerts, or operators escalating exceptions flagged by algorithms. Change management embeds these behaviours into the culture, turning adoption into habit.

Aligning Stakeholders

AI often impacts multiple functions – finance, IT, supply chain, procurement, operations. Without structured change management, misaligned expectations and competing priorities derail projects.

Sustaining Momentum

Unlike ERP implementations, AI systems evolve continuously. Change management provides governance and frameworks for ongoing adoption, retraining, and communication – keeping momentum alive well beyond go-live.

Key Change Management Challenges on AI Projects

Australian and New Zealand organisations face common hurdles when embedding AI in supply chain and procurement:

1. Resistance to Change
   – Employees worry AI will replace their roles or erode professional judgement.
2. Skills Gap
   – Teams may lack confidence in interpreting AI outputs or working with new digital tools.
3. Overestimation of AI’s Readiness
   – Leaders sometimes assume AI is “plug and play,” overlooking the organisational readiness required.
4. Cultural Barriers
   – Some workplaces prioritise experience and intuition over data-driven insights, slowing AI adoption.
5. Fragmented Ownership
   – With IT, procurement, and operations all involved, no single function drives holistic change.
6. Short-Termism
   – Pressure to prove quick results may lead to rushed deployments with poor change management foundations.

Best Practices for Change Management on AI-Enabled Projects

Organisations that thrive in AI-enabled supply chain and procurement transformations adopt structured change management practices.

1. Start with Clear Purpose and Vision

Employees need to know why AI is being introduced, not just what it does. Is the goal to improve service levels? Reduce costs? Enhance sustainability? Clear communication of purpose fosters alignment.

2. Engage Early and Often

Involving end-users in scoping, testing, and piloting builds ownership. Teams that feel consulted are far more likely to adopt.

3. Focus on Capability Building

Investing in training is critical. It’s not just about technical skills but also developing data literacy, critical thinking, and comfort with digital tools.

4. Make the “Black Box” Transparent

Explain how algorithms work in plain language. Provide evidence of accuracy. Use dashboards that highlight assumptions, confidence levels, and exceptions.

5. Redesign Roles and Processes

Don’t simply layer AI over existing ways of working. Revisit job descriptions, workflows, and decision rights to ensure the organisation supports new behaviours.

6. Build Governance Structures

Set up steering committees, user forums, and feedback loops. Change management is ongoing, not just at go-live.

7. Measure and Celebrate Adoption

Track not just technical performance but human adoption metrics – system usage rates, decision alignment, satisfaction. Celebrate early wins to reinforce positive behaviours.

The Link Between Change Management and Project ROI

Research consistently shows that projects with strong change management deliver higher ROI. In AI-enabled supply chain and procurement projects, the link is even clearer:

• Without adoption – algorithms go unused, insights are ignored, and the investment fails.
• With adoption – insights become embedded in daily decisions, productivity improves, and strategic outcomes are realised.

For boards and executives, this makes change management not a side cost but a core investment in ensuring ROI.

The Australian and New Zealand Context

AI adoption in supply chain and procurement is accelerating across Australia and New Zealand. Retailers are testing demand forecasting models. Universities are exploring AI for procurement spend categorisation. Mining companies are investing in AI-driven maintenance scheduling.

But many organisations face unique regional challenges:

• Talent shortages – limited availability of AI-ready supply chain talent.
• Budget scrutiny – projects must prove value in tight cost environments.
• Geographic spread – national networks with dispersed teams make consistent change management harder.
• Regulatory oversight – government agencies and public institutions require transparency and accountability in AI adoption.

These factors mean structured, pragmatic, and locally relevant change management is essential for ANZ organisations.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we understand that AI is reshaping supply chain and procurement – but technology is only half the story. The other half is people, processes, and culture.

We support Australian and New Zealand organisations by:

• Embedding structured change management in every supply chain and procurement transformation, ensuring adoption is built into the project plan, not bolted on at the end.
• Designing role and process transitions so that employees are clear on how their responsibilities evolve in an AI-enabled environment.
• Building capability and confidence in teams to interpret, trust, and act on AI insights.
• Engaging stakeholders across functions – procurement, operations, IT, finance – to align priorities and governance.
• Providing independent guidance – ensuring solutions are pragmatic, culturally aligned, and focused on measurable business outcomes.

Our approach blends deep operational knowledge of supply chain and procurement with proven change management frameworks. The result is not just technology adoption, but sustainable transformation.

Looking Forward – Change Management as a Competitive Advantage

In the coming years, AI will only become more embedded in supply chain and procurement. Those who treat change management as an afterthought will struggle with adoption, waste investment, and erode trust. Those who treat change management as a strategic enabler will unlock competitive advantage.

Effective change management means:

• Teams embrace AI as a tool, not a threat.
• Processes evolve to capture efficiency and agility.
• Organisations sustain momentum in a rapidly changing digital landscape.

For ANZ organisations, the competitive gap between those who invest in change management and those who don’t will grow wider.

AI is revolutionising supply chain and procurement, but the greatest barrier to success isn’t technology – it’s people. Change management is now more important than ever, ensuring that AI projects deliver on their promise of cost efficiency, agility, and improved outcomes.

For property-based businesses, retailers, healthcare providers, universities, government agencies, and manufacturers alike, the message is clear: don’t underestimate the human side of AI adoption.

At Trace Consultants, we help organisations across Australia and New Zealand bridge the gap between technology potential and business reality through structured, pragmatic, and effective change management.

The question is: as AI transforms your supply chain and procurement functions, are you managing the change – or is the change managing you?

Property-Based Businesses – Procurement for Cleaning Services

Walk into any shopping centre before opening hours, and you’ll likely see cleaners moving through the space at pace – vacuuming walkways, polishing tiles, and preparing food court seating areas. The same scene plays out across office towers, stadiums, universities, and hospitals. For property-based businesses, cleaning isn’t just a hygiene factor. It’s central to customer experience, regulatory compliance, and brand reputation.

Yet cleaning services often represent one of the largest categories of indirect spend. Despite this, many organisations approach procurement for cleaning services with outdated scopes, loosely defined service requirements, and insufficient performance structures. The result? Overpaying for under-delivered outcomes, strained supplier relationships, and little ability to adapt as business needs evolve.

This is where strategic procurement can transform cleaning services from a cost burden into a managed investment. By optimising scopes, leveraging technology such as demand sensors and robotic cleaners, and carefully structuring contracts with well-defined KPIs and pricing schedules, property-based businesses can achieve both cost efficiency and improved service quality.

Why Cleaning Procurement Matters for Property-Based Businesses

Cleaning isn’t a one-size-fits-all service. A high-rise office tower has different requirements compared with a shopping centre, airport terminal, or hospital. The challenge lies in balancing three competing factors:

• Cost – ensuring cleaning spend is efficient and market competitive.
• Service outcomes – meeting the hygiene and presentation standards expected by customers, tenants, regulators, and the public.
• Flexibility – allowing service levels to flex with business needs, seasonal demand, and unexpected events.

For property-based businesses, the procurement of cleaning services directly impacts:

• Customer and tenant experience – a spotless foyer, sparkling food court, or well-maintained bathroom shapes first impressions.
• Regulatory compliance – especially in healthcare and food environments where hygiene requirements are non-negotiable.
• Operational risk management – effective cleaning reduces hazards such as slips, trips, and contamination.
• Cost base – often accounting for millions annually across large property portfolios.

Done well, procurement creates value far beyond cost savings. Done poorly, it exposes the business to complaints, risks, and waste.

Common Challenges in Cleaning Services Procurement

Many property-based organisations face similar issues in procuring cleaning services:

1. Outdated scopes of work
   • Scopes often remain unchanged for years, despite changes in foot traffic, tenant mix, or regulatory requirements.
2. Ambiguity in work packages
   • Vague instructions (e.g., “clean daily” without defining method or expected standard) leave room for inconsistent delivery and disputes.
3. Inflexible pricing structures
   • Lump-sum pricing doesn’t account for fluctuating demand, leading to either overpayment or inadequate coverage.
4. Limited technology adoption
   • Many contracts don’t integrate opportunities for automation, robotics, or sensor-driven cleaning.
5. Poorly defined KPIs
   • “Satisfaction-based” measures make accountability difficult.
6. Fragmented supplier management
   • Multiple small providers can create inconsistency and increase management overhead.

Opportunities for Smarter Cleaning Procurement

1. Optimising Scopes of Work

A modern cleaning scope should reflect actual business needs, not historical assumptions. That means:

• Conducting demand analysis – mapping foot traffic patterns, peak times, and seasonal variations.
• Segmenting areas by criticality – e.g., bathrooms, entrances, and food service areas require higher frequency and standards than back-of-house corridors.
• Defining methods and outcomes clearly – specifying whether an area requires vacuuming, mopping, or disinfection, and how “clean” is measured.
• Aligning with brand and regulatory standards – ensuring presentation reflects expectations of premium environments such as luxury retail or healthcare.

An optimised scope avoids both under-servicing (which creates risk) and over-servicing (which drives unnecessary cost).

2. Leveraging Technology – From Sensors to Robots

The cleaning industry is undergoing rapid technological change. Procurement strategies that embrace innovation can unlock both efficiency and quality improvements.

• Demand sensors – installed in bathrooms, bins, and high-traffic zones, these trigger cleaning tasks based on actual usage rather than fixed schedules. For example, a bathroom may only require servicing after 50 uses, not every 30 minutes regardless of need.
• Robotic cleaners – automated floor scrubbers and vacuums can handle repetitive, low-value tasks in large open areas, freeing human cleaners to focus on detail and high-touch tasks.
• Digital workflow tools – apps allow supervisors to allocate tasks in real-time, record completion, and capture photos for accountability.
• Data analytics dashboards – centralised reporting provides visibility on task completion, resourcing, and service levels across multiple sites.

When written into procurement requirements, these technologies can shift cleaning services from being purely labour-based to becoming a blend of human and digital capability.

3. Thoroughly Defined Work Packages and Pricing Schedules

Cleaning services work best when clear and measurable work packages are in place.

• Work package definition – breaking services into discrete tasks (e.g., “clean and disinfect 10 bathrooms, twice daily”) ensures transparency.
• Pricing schedules – separating fixed costs (e.g., management, base staffing) from variable costs (e.g., event cleaning, seasonal peaks) allows flexibility.
• Benchmarking unit rates – comparing costs across properties and providers ensures competitiveness.
• Scenario modelling – testing how changes in foot traffic or operating hours impact cleaning needs, to ensure contracts are scalable.

This level of granularity makes it easier to adjust services without renegotiating entire contracts, while also providing transparency for cost reviews.

4. Structuring Contracts, KPIs, and Governance

Contracts for cleaning services should create alignment between business outcomes and supplier performance.

• Performance-based KPIs – e.g., cleanliness audit scores, task completion rates, customer complaint response times.
• Outcome-linked incentives – bonus or penalty regimes linked to compliance, presentation standards, or sustainability targets.
• Clear escalation protocols – ensuring issues are resolved quickly and transparently.
• Sustainability considerations – specifying environmentally friendly products, recycling, and waste diversion targets.
• Regular review cycles – quarterly performance reviews ensure services remain aligned to evolving needs.

With structured governance in place, organisations can shift from reactive supplier management to proactive partnership.

The Role of Procurement in Driving Value

Procurement leaders have an important role in balancing operational needs, supplier innovation, and commercial outcomes. Key considerations include:

• Market engagement – running robust tenders that test incumbents and challenge the market.
• Supplier evaluation – weighting technical capability, innovation, and cultural fit alongside price.
• Commercial negotiation – securing flexibility in scope, pricing, and technology adoption.
• Ongoing contract management – embedding governance to ensure long-term success.

The result is not just cost savings, but a more reliable, flexible, and future-ready cleaning service model.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we understand that cleaning services are more than just an operating cost – they are a driver of brand, customer experience, and efficiency for property-based businesses.

We help organisations in Australia and New Zealand by:

• Reviewing and optimising scopes to align with actual business needs, regulatory requirements, and presentation standards.
• Leveraging technology – from demand sensors to robotic cleaning – and ensuring procurement strategies capture the benefits of innovation.
• Defining work packages and pricing structures that provide transparency, flexibility, and scalability.
• Structuring contracts and KPIs to align supplier performance with business outcomes.
• Providing independent benchmarking to test competitiveness and highlight opportunities.

Our team brings deep operational expertise, independence, and a pragmatic approach that ensures procurement delivers measurable results – not just theoretical savings.

Looking Ahead – The Future of Cleaning Procurement

As labour markets tighten and sustainability expectations grow, the cleaning industry will continue to evolve. Property-based businesses should expect:

• Greater automation – with robotic cleaning becoming mainstream in large, open environments.
• Sensor-driven services – enabling true demand-based resourcing.
• Sustainability at the forefront – low-toxicity chemicals, recycling, and reduced water usage will be mandated.
• Outcome-based contracting – moving away from inputs (hours worked) towards measurable results.

Those who invest in modern procurement approaches today will be best placed to adapt tomorrow.

Cleaning services are essential to the operation and reputation of property-based businesses. Yet they are often procured in ways that lock in inefficiency, limit innovation, and obscure value. By optimising scopes, embracing technology, defining transparent work packages, and structuring robust contracts with clear KPIs, property owners and managers can transform cleaning from a sunk cost into a strategic enabler.

With expertise in procurement strategy, contract design, and supplier management, Trace Consultants is here to help Australian and New Zealand organisations achieve smarter outcomes from their cleaning services.

The question is no longer whether cleaning procurement can deliver value – but whether your business is ready to unlock it.

‍

1. Why Workforce Planning, Rostering, and Scheduling Matter

For organisations across healthcare, aged care, retail, hospitality, logistics, and government services, the workforce is both the largest cost and the most critical enabler of service. Yet too often, staffing decisions are reactive—filling rosters at the last minute, plugging gaps with overtime, or overstaffing to be “safe”.

This ad-hoc approach can erode margins, burn out staff, and leave service levels vulnerable. In contrast, organisations that plan, roster, and schedule with precision can:

• Match labour supply to demand more accurately.
• Reduce overtime and agency costs.
• Improve staff satisfaction and retention.
• Maintain or improve service levels, even in peak periods.
• Build resilience to sudden changes.

At Trace Consultants, we help Australian and New Zealand organisations design workforce strategies that balance service, cost, and workforce engagement—backed by data, informed by industry best practice, and tailored to each client’s operating environment.

2. Breaking Down the Three Layers

While often grouped together, workforce planning, rostering, and scheduling operate at different levels of detail and time horizon.

2.1 Workforce Planning – The Strategic Layer

Workforce planning answers:
“How many people, in what roles, with what skills, do we need over the next 1–5 years?”

It’s about anticipating demand and shaping the workforce to match:

• Long-term recruitment planning.
• Skill development and training pathways.
• Shifts in service models or technology use.
• Geographic redeployment of roles.

2.2 Rostering – The Tactical Layer

Rostering answers:
“How do we allocate staff to shifts over the next 2–8 weeks?”

It’s about:

• Matching staff availability and skills to forecast demand.
• Ensuring compliance with awards, enterprise agreements, and labour laws.
• Balancing full-time, part-time, casual, and contract staff mix.
• Supporting fairness and transparency for staff.

2.3 Scheduling – The Operational Layer

Scheduling answers:
“Who is doing what, where, and when today or tomorrow?”

It’s the real-time execution:

• Allocating specific tasks, jobs, or locations.
• Managing last-minute changes (absences, urgent jobs).
• Communicating updates to staff clearly and quickly.

3. The ANZ Workforce Context

3.1 Labour Market Tightness

Low unemployment and skills shortages make efficient workforce use critical—every wasted hour is an opportunity cost.

3.2 Award and Agreement Complexity

Australian and New Zealand organisations operate under a patchwork of awards, EBAs, and compliance requirements, making manual rostering risky.

3.3 Geographic Challenges

From remote aged care facilities in WA to seasonal horticulture in NZ, location shapes workforce availability and cost.

3.4 Increasing Service Expectations

Customers, patients, and citizens expect faster response, extended hours, and personalised service—all of which put pressure on staffing models.

4. Common Challenges We See

1. Reactive Rostering – Rosters built to “fill gaps” rather than meet demand forecasts.
2. Poor Demand Forecasting – No clear link between workload demand and roster design.
3. Overtime & Agency Blowouts – Due to short-notice coverage and inflexible rosters.
4. Low Staff Engagement – Perceived unfairness, unpredictable shifts, and poor communication.
5. Manual Processes – Spreadsheets that can’t handle complexity or compliance rules.
6. Disconnected Systems – Workforce planning, payroll, and operations not integrated.

5. Best Practice Principles

From our work at Trace Consultants, there are six principles that underpin effective workforce planning, rostering, and scheduling:

5.1 Start with Demand

Accurate demand forecasting is the foundation. This could be:

• Patient admissions and acuity in healthcare.
• Sales transactions in retail.
• Bookings or job orders in services.

5.2 Define Your Service Model

Be clear on what “good” looks like:

• Response times.
• Service coverage hours.
• Skill-to-task matching.

5.3 Use the Right Workforce Mix

Balance:

• Permanent vs. casual.
• Full-time vs. part-time.
• Specialist vs. multi-skilled roles.

5.4 Build Flexibility

Use split shifts, on-call pools, and redeployment to handle variability without excess cost.

5.5 Leverage Technology

Move beyond manual rostering. Modern workforce management systems automate compliance checks, allow self-service, and integrate with payroll.

5.6 Engage Staff in the Process

Transparency and fairness in rostering build trust and improve retention.

6. The Role of Technology

Technology can transform workforce planning and rostering from a reactive, admin-heavy process into a strategic enabler.

Capabilities include:

• AI-driven demand forecasting – factoring in historical patterns, seasonality, and external events.
• Automated compliance checks – ensuring rosters meet award/EBA requirements.
• Self-service portals – letting staff view rosters, swap shifts, and request leave.
• Real-time updates – pushing changes to staff via mobile apps.

At Trace Consultants, we help clients select and implement technology that suits their size, complexity, and budget—whether enterprise-grade systems or tactical, lower-cost solutions.

7. Building an Integrated Workforce Planning Model

An integrated model links the strategic, tactical, and operational layers:

1. Strategic Workforce Planning informs recruitment, training, and workforce mix decisions.
2. Demand Forecasting feeds rostering cycles, ensuring labour supply meets predicted workload.
3. Rostering allocates staff to shifts in compliance with agreements and operational needs.
4. Daily Scheduling assigns tasks and locations, adjusting for real-time changes.
5. Performance Measurement tracks cost, productivity, and service outcomes—feeding back into planning.

8. Industry Applications

Healthcare & Aged Care

• Matching staff skills to patient acuity levels.
• Managing home care visit schedules for efficiency and compliance.
• Reducing agency dependency.

Retail & Hospitality

• Aligning staff hours to peak trading patterns.
• Balancing service quality with wage cost control.

Logistics & Field Services

• Optimising driver or technician schedules to minimise travel time.
• Managing fatigue compliance in transport.

Government & Emergency Services

• Ensuring 24/7 coverage with fatigue and skill mix considerations.
• Scaling up for surge events or seasonal demand.

9. How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we take a data-led, people-centred approach to workforce planning, rostering, and scheduling projects.

Our support typically includes:

• Current State Assessment – Analysing rostering practices, workforce mix, and cost/service performance.
• Demand Forecasting Models – Using historical and external data to predict workload patterns.
• Roster Design – Aligning shifts, skills, and coverage to forecast demand.
• Technology Selection & Deployment – Identifying and implementing the right workforce management tools.
• Change Management – Building leadership and frontline capability to sustain improvements.
• Performance Tracking Frameworks – Setting KPIs for cost, productivity, and service levels.

Because we’re independent and vendor-agnostic, our recommendations are always aligned to your operational goals, not tied to a particular software or supplier.

10. Measuring Success

Improvements should be measured against a clear baseline, using metrics such as:

• Labour cost as a % of revenue or service output.
• Overtime and agency hours as a % of total hours.
• Staff turnover and absenteeism rates.
• Compliance breaches or penalties.
• Service level performance.

11. Future Trends

• Predictive Workforce Planning – Using AI and machine learning to anticipate demand changes earlier.
• Total Workforce Management – Integrating permanent, casual, contractor, and gig workers into one system.
• Employee Experience Focus – Designing rosters that improve work-life balance as a retention tool.
• Sustainability & Social Responsibility – Considering workforce planning’s role in meeting ESG goals.

Final Thoughts

Workforce planning, rostering, and scheduling are not just administrative tasks—they are strategic levers that can make or break service delivery, cost control, and workforce engagement.

In Australia and New Zealand’s competitive and resource-constrained environment, the organisations that succeed will be those that treat their workforce as a planned, optimised asset—not just a cost to manage.

By combining data analysis, operational insight, and a deep understanding of people and change, Trace Consultants helps organisations build workforce planning frameworks that deliver service excellence, cost efficiency, and a better employee experience.

‍

Network Optimisation & Warehouse Design: Creating Efficient, Scalable Supply Chains in Australia & New Zealand

1. Why Network Optimisation and Warehouse Design Matter

In Australia and New Zealand, the supply chain landscape is shaped by distance, geography, infrastructure constraints, and increasingly demanding customers. Whether you’re a retailer servicing both bricks-and-mortar and e-commerce channels, a manufacturer supplying multiple regions, or a government agency with critical service levels to meet, your network design and warehouse setup directly determine your cost base, responsiveness, and resilience.

The reality is this: a well-designed network, paired with optimised warehouse layouts and processes, can deliver service improvements and cost reductions in the double digits. A poorly designed network can create bottlenecks, inflate working capital, and slow your ability to adapt.

At Trace Consultants, we see network optimisation and warehouse design not as isolated projects, but as two halves of the same strategic coin—each influencing the other and together shaping long-term performance.

2. Understanding Network Optimisation

What It Is

Network optimisation is the process of designing or refining your distribution network to ensure goods flow through the right number, type, and location of facilities—at the lowest cost possible while still meeting service targets.

This involves:

• Facility location planning – Deciding where to place DCs, warehouses, cross-docks, and other nodes.
• Flow path optimisation – Determining how goods move between suppliers, facilities, and customers.
• Inventory positioning – Deciding what products to hold where, and in what quantities.
• Transport network design – Balancing modes, lead times, and freight costs.

Why It Matters in ANZ

The unique geography of Australia and New Zealand magnifies the consequences of network decisions:

• Long distances between population centres increase freight costs and lead times.
• Port reliance creates potential chokepoints in import-heavy supply chains.
• Seasonality and regional demand variation make flexible capacity critical.
• Infrastructure limitations in rural and remote areas require creative transport solutions.

3. Warehouse Design – More Than Just Floorplans

What It Involves

Warehouse design is the strategic planning of a facility’s layout, processes, and equipment to ensure space is used efficiently, goods flow smoothly, and operations are safe and scalable.

Key elements include:

• Site selection & footprint planning – Ensuring the building supports operational needs now and in the future.
• Internal layout – Positioning receiving, storage, picking, packing, and dispatch areas for minimal travel and handling.
• Racking configuration – Balancing storage density with accessibility.
• Material handling equipment selection – Choosing forklifts, conveyors, automation, or robotics based on throughput and ROI.
• Process flow design – Streamlining inbound, internal, and outbound operations.
• Workforce ergonomics & safety – Designing for compliance, safety, and productivity.

The ANZ Context

In Australia and New Zealand, warehouse design must factor in:

• Labour market constraints – Shortages can make automation attractive, but ROI analysis is critical.
• Property market dynamics – Availability of industrial space in key locations can be limited.
• Environmental requirements – Energy efficiency, sustainability targets, and local compliance standards.

4. Why Network Optimisation and Warehouse Design Should Be Done Together

It’s tempting to treat network design and warehouse design as separate initiatives—one decides where facilities go, the other decides what happens inside them. But in practice, they’re deeply interconnected.

Examples:

• A centralised network might favour a high-automation, high-throughput warehouse.
• A decentralised network might require smaller, more flexible facilities with lower automation investment.
• Inventory strategy will dictate racking design, storage space allocation, and pick-face layout.
• Transport decisions influence dock door numbers, staging space, and yard design.

At Trace Consultants, we often run network and warehouse design modelling in parallel—ensuring they align with each other, and with the client’s broader supply chain strategy.

5. The Process – From Strategy to Execution

Step 1: Current State Assessment

Understand the existing network, warehouse performance, costs, and constraints. Map flows, inventory positions, and facility capabilities.

Step 2: Data Collection & Validation

Gather volume, order profile, SKU, and transport data. Validate it to ensure modelling is accurate.

Step 3: Scenario Modelling

Test different network configurations (e.g., fewer DCs vs. more regional facilities) and warehouse layouts (e.g., different picking methods, automation levels).

Step 4: Trade-Off Analysis

Balance cost, service, flexibility, and risk. In ANZ, this often means weighing higher facility costs against reduced transport spend or improved service to remote customers.

Step 5: Design Finalisation

Confirm the network footprint and warehouse designs that best meet strategic objectives.

Step 6: Implementation Roadmap

Develop a phased plan for property acquisition, construction or fit-out, technology deployment, and change management.

6. Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Designing in isolation – Making warehouse changes without considering the network, or vice versa.
• Over-automating too soon – Investing heavily in technology without sufficient throughput or stability to justify it.
• Ignoring demand volatility – Designing only for today’s volumes rather than future scenarios.
• Underestimating change management – Not preparing teams for new processes and technologies.
• Failing to stress-test designs – Not modelling how facilities and the network perform under surge or disruption conditions.

7. The Role of Technology in Network & Warehouse Design

While advanced planning systems and simulation tools are valuable, technology is only as good as the process and assumptions behind it.

Typical tools used include:

• Network optimisation software for location and flow modelling.
• Warehouse simulation tools to test layouts and equipment choices.
• Digital twins for scenario testing and risk modelling.

Trace Consultants helps clients select fit-for-purpose tools—whether enterprise platforms or tactical, lower-cost solutions for faster ROI.

8. Sustainability and ESG in Design

Both network optimisation and warehouse design offer significant opportunities to support sustainability goals:

• Reducing transport kilometres by locating closer to demand.
• Energy-efficient warehouse design with LED lighting, solar, and insulation.
• Waste reduction through process improvements.
• Green building standards for new facilities.

Embedding sustainability into design decisions not only supports compliance and brand reputation but can also drive cost savings.

9. How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we bring independent, solution-agnostic advice to network optimisation and warehouse design projects.

Our approach includes:

• End-to-end perspective – Linking network strategy to warehouse design, operations, and technology.
• Scenario-based modelling – Ensuring decisions are data-driven and tested against future demand and disruption scenarios.
• Commercial focus – Balancing cost reduction with service and flexibility.
• Implementation support – From property fit-out to process change and technology deployment.
• Sustainability integration – Embedding ESG goals into design decisions.

Because we don’t sell property, equipment, or software, our recommendations are shaped solely by your operational requirements and strategic objectives.

10. Real-World Impact in the ANZ Context

In the ANZ market, optimised networks and warehouse designs have:

• Reduced transport costs by cutting empty running and optimising routes.
• Freed up capital through better inventory positioning.
• Improved customer service levels, especially in regional areas.
• Increased capacity without the need for new facilities, simply through layout redesign.

These outcomes don’t happen by accident—they come from structured analysis, cross-functional collaboration, and disciplined execution.

11. Future Trends in Network Optimisation & Warehouse Design

• AI-driven demand forecasting to better position stock in networks.
• Micro-fulfilment centres to service last-mile delivery faster.
• Flexible automation that can be redeployed as needs change.
• Digital twins for real-time performance monitoring and scenario planning.
• Net zero design principles influencing both network structure and facility specifications.

Final Thoughts

In Australia and New Zealand, the physical network and the warehouses within it are the backbone of supply chain performance. Get the design right, and you unlock lower costs, faster service, and stronger resilience. Get it wrong, and you bake inefficiency into your operations for years.

By bringing together network optimisation and warehouse design into a single, integrated process, Trace Consultants helps organisations make better decisions—grounded in data, aligned with strategy, and ready for the future.

‍

Emergency Services and Emergency Response Supply Chains: Building Capability, Speed, and Resilience in Australia & New Zealand

1. Why Emergency Response Supply Chains Matter More Than Ever

Emergency services in Australia and New Zealand—police, fire, ambulance, defence, search and rescue, and specialist disaster recovery teams—operate in high-pressure environments where supply chain performance can be the difference between life and death.

When bushfires tear through regional Victoria, when cyclones hit Far North Queensland, or when earthquakes strike Wellington, these organisations need the right equipment, in the right place, at the right time—every time.

Unlike most commercial supply chains, these networks must operate with uncertain demand, unpredictable timing, and extremely high stakes. They can’t wait for supplier lead times to catch up or for a normal procurement process to run its course. They require pre-positioned inventory, flexible capacity, and rapid mobilisation protocols.

At Trace Consultants, we’ve seen firsthand how well-designed emergency response supply chains can save critical hours, reduce operational risk, and improve outcomes for both responders and communities.

2. What Makes Emergency Response Supply Chains Different

While they share some fundamentals with commercial supply chains, emergency response supply chains have distinct characteristics:

1. Unpredictable Demand Profiles – Events may be seasonal (e.g., bushfire season) or completely unforeseen (e.g., pandemics, large-scale accidents).
2. Critical Service Levels – Performance isn’t measured in DIFOT percentages alone—it’s measured in lives saved, property protected, and operational continuity.
3. Multi-Agency Coordination – Fire services, police, defence, local government, and private contractors often operate in the same network during a crisis.
4. Geographic Reach – Coverage must extend into remote and difficult-to-access areas.
5. Surge Capability – Ability to rapidly scale resources, transport, and personnel.
6. Resilience to Disruption – Supply lines must remain functional during infrastructure failure, extreme weather, or security incidents.

3. The Building Blocks of an Effective Emergency Response Supply Chain

3.1 Pre-Event Preparedness

Preparedness is the foundation. This involves:

• Demand Scenario Modelling – Understanding likely event types and volume surges.
• Strategic Stock Positioning – Locating supplies in depots or forward bases close to risk areas.
• Contracted Standby Resources – Agreements with suppliers and logistics providers to mobilise at short notice.

3.2 Real-Time Visibility

In emergencies, leaders need a live view of:

• Current stock levels and locations.
• Resource status (e.g., vehicles, medical teams).
• Transport availability and estimated arrival times.

3.3 Flexible Sourcing and Distribution

Supplies may need to be redirected mid-transit or sourced from non-traditional vendors. Multi-modal transport (road, air, sea) is often critical.

3.4 Rapid Mobilisation Protocols

Clear processes for activating resources, escalating requests, and bypassing non-essential steps during emergencies.

3.5 Inter-Agency Collaboration

Shared platforms, data standards, and joint planning exercises improve coordination across organisations.

4. Common Weaknesses in Current Systems

Across Australia and New Zealand, emergency response networks sometimes face:

• Fragmented Systems – Different agencies using incompatible technology platforms.
• Lack of Stock Visibility – No single view of available assets across the network.
• Over-Reliance on Manual Processes – Slowing down mobilisation.
• Limited Surge Planning – Insufficient contracted capacity or pre-approved supplier arrangements.
• Post-Event Bottlenecks – Slow replenishment after major events, leaving gaps in readiness.

5. Designing for ANZ Realities

5.1 Geography

Both Australia and New Zealand have vast rural areas, long distances between population centres, and regions prone to isolation during extreme events. Pre-positioning stock and mobile capability is essential.

5.2 Climate & Seasonal Risk

• Bushfires in summer and early autumn.
• Cyclones in the north during warmer months.
• Flooding in low-lying areas.
• Severe winter storms in alpine and southern regions.

APS-style scenario planning, adapted for emergency needs, allows agencies to forecast and plan for these patterns.

5.3 Cross-Border Support

State-to-state and trans-Tasman cooperation is common. Designing processes for asset sharing and redeployment improves resilience.

6. Technology’s Role in Modern Emergency Response Supply Chains

Technology is no longer optional—it’s an enabler for speed, coordination, and accountability.

• Asset Tracking Systems – RFID or GPS to monitor critical equipment and vehicles.
• Supply Chain Control Towers – Providing a live, integrated view of supply and demand.
• Mobile Apps for Field Teams – To request, confirm, and receive supplies in the field.
• Data Integration with Suppliers – Enabling automated replenishment triggers.

Trace Consultants works with agencies to select and implement fit-for-purpose solutions—ranging from full-scale planning systems to tactical low-code tools that can be deployed rapidly.

7. Workforce and Resource Planning

Emergency response isn’t just about physical supplies—it’s also about the people who operate the systems, equipment, and vehicles.

Effective workforce planning for emergency supply chains covers:

• Skill Availability – Ensuring trained personnel are ready for mobilisation.
• Shift & Rostering Systems – Balancing fatigue management with operational demand.
• Cross-Training – Increasing workforce flexibility.
• Volunteer Integration – Managing large-scale community volunteer involvement during crises.

8. Supply Chain Resilience Principles for Emergencies

To build resilience:

1. Diversify Suppliers – Avoid dependency on a single source.
2. Pre-Negotiate Contracts – Include surge pricing and mobilisation clauses.
3. Build Redundancy in Transport Modes – Keep options open for road, rail, air, or maritime movement.
4. Invest in Data Redundancy – Ensure systems remain operational even during power or connectivity loss.
5. Run Regular Simulations – Test readiness under realistic conditions.

9. The Role of Private Sector Partners

Many emergency responses rely on private sector partners—logistics providers, construction companies, equipment suppliers—to augment government capabilities. Building strong, tested relationships is essential for quick mobilisation.

10. How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we help emergency services and supporting agencies design, optimise, and implement emergency response supply chains that are ready for real-world challenges.

Our support typically includes:

• Current State Assessment – Reviewing readiness, resilience, and response capability.
• Network Design – Determining optimal stock locations, depot layouts, and distribution flows.
• Technology Selection & Deployment – Implementing tools for visibility, tracking, and scenario modelling.
• Supplier & Contract Strategy – Creating agreements that enable rapid, scalable response.
• Workforce & Rostering Integration – Ensuring personnel capability aligns with supply capacity.
• Post-Event Review Frameworks – Capturing lessons and embedding continuous improvement.

Because we’re independent and vendor-agnostic, our recommendations are shaped solely around your operational needs and constraints.

11. Measuring Success

An effective emergency response supply chain can be measured by:

• Mobilisation Time – How fast resources are deployed after an event trigger.
• Fulfilment Accuracy – Whether the right supplies reach the right location.
• Surge Capacity – Ability to meet peak demand without failure.
• Post-Event Recovery – Speed of stock and capability replenishment.
• Inter-Agency Coordination Scores – Quality of collaboration during joint responses.

12. Future Trends in ANZ Emergency Response Supply Chains

• AI for Event Prediction – Using climate, social, and infrastructure data to forecast potential incidents.
• Drones for Rapid Delivery – Especially in remote or inaccessible locations.
• Sustainable Readiness – Balancing preparedness with environmentally responsible practices.
• Digital Twins – Simulating emergency scenarios and testing supply chain response before a real event occurs.

Final Thoughts

Emergency services and emergency response supply chains in Australia and New Zealand operate under unique pressures. The stakes are higher, the conditions more unpredictable, and the margin for error far smaller than in most commercial contexts.

With the right design, governance, technology, and partnerships, these supply chains can deliver speed, resilience, and life-saving reliability. The key is preparation—because when the event hits, it’s already too late to start building capability.

Trace Consultants brings the strategic insight, operational depth, and practical delivery experience to help emergency services plan, adapt, and perform when it matters most.

‍

Advanced Planning Systems: A Practical Guide for Australian & New Zealand Organisations

1. Why Advanced Planning Systems Are Moving Up the ANZ Agenda

In Australia and New Zealand, supply chains face a unique blend of challenges—vast distances, variable lead times, constrained labour markets, and unpredictable demand. In this environment, the traditional approach to supply chain planning—spread across spreadsheets, disconnected systems, and departmental silos—has real limits.

Enter Advanced Planning Systems (APS): technology platforms designed to connect, optimise, and automate planning processes across demand, supply, inventory, and production. They provide a single version of the truth, enabling faster and more accurate decision-making.

At Trace Consultants, we see APS not as a “plug-and-play” magic bullet but as a toolset that must be carefully selected, configured, and embedded into your operating model to deliver lasting value.

2. What Exactly Is an Advanced Planning System?

An APS is a specialised software platform that integrates data from across your business and uses algorithms, analytics, and automation to optimise supply chain plans. Unlike traditional ERP planning modules, APS tools are designed to look forward, model scenarios, and optimise outcomes rather than simply record transactions.

Core capabilities often include:

• Demand Planning & Forecasting – Using statistical models and machine learning to generate accurate demand plans.
• Inventory Optimisation – Balancing stock levels across the network to minimise working capital while maintaining service.
• Supply Planning – Aligning procurement, production, and distribution to meet demand within capacity constraints.
• Production Scheduling – Optimising manufacturing sequences for efficiency, throughput, and quality.
• Scenario Planning – Simulating “what-if” situations, such as supplier delays or demand surges, before they happen.

The best APS platforms create visibility across the entire supply chain, from suppliers to customers, enabling proactive rather than reactive management.

3. Why APS Matters for Australian and New Zealand Businesses

3.1 Long Lead Times & Geographic Spread

Import-heavy supply chains, inter-island transport in NZ, and long-haul domestic freight in Australia make accurate forecasting and inventory positioning essential.

3.2 Seasonal and Promotional Volatility

From peak tourism periods to retail holiday seasons, APS can model seasonal curves and promotional lifts, helping avoid both stockouts and overstocks.

3.3 Cost Pressures

Labour, transport, and raw material costs are all rising. APS can reduce inefficiencies and improve asset utilisation, lowering cost per unit.

3.4 Sustainability and ESG Goals

APS can help reduce waste, optimise transport routes, and improve energy usage—supporting sustainability reporting and compliance.

4. The Benefits of an APS Done Well

When implemented properly, APS can deliver:

• Improved Forecast Accuracy – Better predictions of demand patterns, leading to more efficient supply decisions.
• Reduced Working Capital – Lower inventory holdings without risking service.
• Increased Service Levels – Meeting customer demand more consistently.
• Enhanced Supply Chain Resilience – Rapid response to disruptions with scenario modelling.
• Better Cross-Functional Alignment – Commercial, operational, and financial teams planning from the same numbers.
• Faster Decision-Making – Automated alerts and planning cycles reduce lag between event and action.

5. Common Pitfalls in APS Projects

Many ANZ organisations struggle to unlock the full potential of APS because of:

1. Poor Data Quality – An APS is only as good as the data it receives.
2. Unclear Objectives – Without a clear business case, scope creep and underuse are common.
3. Over-Customisation – Excessive tailoring can make systems hard to maintain and upgrade.
4. Lack of Change Management – APS adoption requires new behaviours as well as new tools.
5. Technology-Led Thinking – Choosing the system before defining the process and requirements.

At Trace Consultants, we put process and people first, ensuring technology supports rather than dictates the operating model.

6. How APS Fits with S&OP and IBP

An APS can turbocharge your Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) process by providing the data, analytics, and scenarios needed to make informed decisions.

In more mature organisations, APS also supports Integrated Business Planning (IBP)—linking operational plans to strategic and financial plans.

Think of it like this:

• S&OP/IBP = The decision-making framework.
• APS = The intelligence engine feeding that framework.

7. Selecting the Right APS for Your Business

Step 1: Define Your Objectives

What problem are you trying to solve—forecast accuracy, inventory reduction, production efficiency, or all of the above?

Step 2: Map Your Processes

Document your current planning processes and identify pain points.

Step 3: Build Functional Requirements

Define what capabilities the system must have, including integration needs.

Step 4: Evaluate Vendors

Compare functionality, scalability, ease of use, and total cost of ownership.

Step 5: Plan for Implementation and Adoption

Consider training, process redesign, and governance from the outset.

Trace Consultants often supports clients through vendor evaluation, helping them navigate the crowded APS market with objectivity.

8. Implementation: From Planning to Go-Live

A successful APS project usually follows these phases:

1. Discovery & Design – Process mapping, data audits, and solution design.
2. Configuration – Setting up the system to align with business processes.
3. Data Migration – Cleansing, loading, and validating master and transaction data.
4. Testing & Simulation – Running planning cycles in a sandbox to refine settings.
5. Training & Change Management – Ensuring users understand both the system and the “why” behind it.
6. Go-Live & Hypercare – Monitoring and fine-tuning in the early weeks of operation.

9. How Trace Consultants Can Help

We bring a practical, supply-chain-first approach to APS projects—helping you avoid the common traps and realise value faster.

Our support spans:

• Readiness Assessments – Evaluating your current state, data maturity, and business case.
• Process & Operating Model Design – Defining how planning will work before the system is selected.
• Vendor Selection Support – Shortlisting and assessing vendors based on your needs, not their marketing.
• Implementation Partner Support – Acting as your advocate during vendor-led implementations.
• Change Management & Training – Ensuring adoption through role clarity, capability building, and leadership engagement.
• Post-Go-Live Optimisation – Measuring outcomes, refining settings, and embedding continuous improvement.

You can read more on our technology transformation services.

10. APS in Key ANZ Industries

Retail & FMCG

Managing high SKU counts, promotions, and omnichannel distribution requires precise forecasting and inventory optimisation.

Manufacturing

APS can optimise production sequencing, material planning, and capacity utilisation.

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

For these sectors, APS supports critical service levels, compliance, and shelf-life management.

Mining & Resources

Complex, multi-tier supply chains with long lead times benefit from APS-driven inventory and demand planning.

11. Measuring APS Success

Success should be measured against the original business case. Common metrics include:

• Forecast accuracy
• Inventory turns
• Service level (fill rate, DIFOT)
• Planning cycle time reduction
• Working capital reduction
• Waste or obsolescence reduction

12. Future of APS in ANZ

• AI & Machine Learning – Further automation of forecasting and optimisation.
• End-to-End Digital Twins – Simulating the supply chain in real time.
• Sustainability Metrics Integration – Embedding carbon, waste, and energy KPIs into planning.
• Cloud-Native Solutions – Greater scalability and integration flexibility.

Final Word

In the ANZ supply chain landscape—where distance, cost, and complexity create constant challenges—Advanced Planning Systems offer a real competitive advantage. But they’re only effective when they’re matched to the right processes, embedded into the right operating model, and embraced by the people who use them.

At Trace Consultants, we ensure APS investments deliver measurable value—aligning your planning processes, technology, and people so your supply chain can perform at its best.

‍

Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) in Australia & New Zealand

A Practical Guide to Driving Service, Cost, and Strategic Alignment

1. Why S&OP Has Become a Critical Capability in ANZ

For many Australian and New Zealand businesses, the past few years have been defined by unpredictability—demand swings, supply disruption, labour shortages, and changing consumer expectations. Traditional planning cycles, once enough to keep operations steady, have been tested to their limits.

Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) has emerged as a critical capability for businesses wanting to align their commercial ambitions with operational realities. Done well, S&OP connects strategy with execution, bringing sales, marketing, operations, finance, and supply chain teams onto the same page.

At Trace Consultants, we see S&OP as more than a monthly meeting—it’s a management discipline that, when embedded properly, delivers better decisions, more responsive operations, and improved financial outcomes.

2. What S&OP Actually Is (and Isn’t)

The Core Definition

At its heart, S&OP is a cross-functional business process that balances demand and supply, aligns operational plans with financial targets, and ensures all stakeholders are working from a single agreed view of the future.

A robust S&OP process:

• Integrates data from sales, marketing, operations, and finance
• Generates a consensus demand plan
• Aligns supply plans to meet that demand within agreed constraints
• Highlights gaps, risks, and opportunities
• Supports proactive decision-making before issues hit customers or the bottom line

What It’s Not

S&OP is not just a supply chain tool, a sales forecast, or an operations meeting. When reduced to these, it loses its strategic edge. True S&OP brings together all parts of the business to make trade-off decisions and drive profitability.

3. The Five Common Weaknesses in S&OP Processes

In ANZ, we often see organisations struggling with S&OP because of:

1. Siloed thinking – Sales, marketing, operations, and finance working to different targets.
2. Weak data foundations – Poor or inconsistent forecasting inputs.
3. Overcomplicated processes – Time-heavy processes that don’t lead to actionable decisions.
4. Lack of senior engagement – Without executive buy-in, tough decisions get deferred.
5. Disconnect from strategy – S&OP focused purely on operational firefighting rather than longer-term priorities.

These challenges aren’t unique to one industry—they appear in retail, manufacturing, FMCG, and even government supply chains. They also explain why many S&OP initiatives stall after initial enthusiasm.

4. The Building Blocks of Effective S&OP

Trace Consultants works with ANZ organisations to strengthen S&OP across six building blocks:

4.1 Clear Purpose and Objectives

Define what S&OP must achieve—be it service improvement, working capital reduction, margin protection, or a blend of these. Without a clear aim, the process becomes a reporting cycle instead of a decision-making engine.

4.2 Data and Forecasting Foundations

High-quality inputs drive high-quality outputs. This means:

• Capturing historical sales and supply data accurately
• Applying statistical forecasting methods (with human intelligence layered on)
• Regularly tracking forecast accuracy and bias

4.3 Cross-Functional Collaboration

The power of S&OP lies in uniting functions that rarely sit down together. The best processes have marketing talking about promotional lift, operations discussing capacity, and finance ensuring plans meet margin targets—all in the same conversation.

4.4 Governance and Cadence

Strong S&OP runs on a clear schedule—monthly or even weekly for volatile environments—with defined steps, from demand review to supply review to executive sign-off.

4.5 Scenario Planning

Decision-makers should see the impact of different choices before committing. Scenario modelling shows what happens if demand surges, supply is delayed, or raw materials increase in cost.

4.6 Integration with IBP

S&OP can be the stepping stone to Integrated Business Planning (IBP), where strategic, operational, and financial planning merge into one process. Many Trace Consultants clients use S&OP as the foundation for IBP maturity.

5. How S&OP Delivers Value

A well-run S&OP process can drive tangible results in ANZ organisations:

• Improved Service Levels – Inventory and capacity are aligned to meet demand more reliably.
• Lower Inventory Costs – Excess stock is reduced without increasing stockouts.
• Better Cash Flow – Working capital is managed more effectively.
• Stronger Margins – Trade-offs between service, cost, and revenue are made with full visibility.
• Faster Decision-Making – Risks and opportunities are identified early, not after the fact.

For example, in FMCG and retail, promotional campaigns often create unpredictable spikes in demand. With S&OP, the commercial team can share early campaign details, operations can model the impact, and procurement can adjust orders accordingly—preventing lost sales or costly excess.

6. S&OP in the ANZ Context

6.1 Geographic Challenges

Long transport distances, multi-modal logistics, and regional service requirements make lead time management critical. S&OP ensures supply decisions consider geography alongside demand.

6.2 Seasonal Demand Patterns

Agriculture, tourism, and retail all face seasonal swings. S&OP helps organisations ramp up or down efficiently, avoiding costly overcapacity.

6.3 Labour and Skills Shortages

With skilled labour in short supply in many industries, workforce planning becomes a key part of supply capability discussions.

6.4 Sustainability and Compliance

Increasingly, S&OP is used to track and plan for ESG targets, ensuring supply and demand plans align with sustainability commitments and compliance obligations.

7. Technology’s Role in Modern S&OP

S&OP can run in Excel in the early stages, but technology unlocks speed, scale, and deeper insights.

Trace Consultants supports clients in selecting and implementing the right tools—whether that’s a full-scale advanced planning system, a fit-for-purpose mid-tier solution, or tactical low-code tools that bridge system gaps.

Key technology enablers include:

• Advanced Planning Systems (APS) – Integrated platforms combining demand, supply, and scenario planning.
• Data Visualisation Tools – Dashboards to track forecast accuracy, inventory health, and service metrics.
• Automation – Reducing manual reconciliation of data.
• Collaboration Platforms – Enabling real-time decision-making across sites and regions.

8. How Trace Consultants Can Help

We take a practical, tailored, and outcomes-focused approach to S&OP, bringing together supply chain depth, commercial understanding, and change management capability.

Here’s how we typically help:

8.1 Current State Review

We assess your existing planning processes, data quality, governance, and decision-making structures to identify strengths and gaps.

8.2 S&OP Design and Framework

We co-design a fit-for-purpose S&OP process that reflects your industry, business size, and growth ambitions.

8.3 Capability and Tools

We help you choose the right enabling tools—whether it’s upgrading existing systems or deploying cost-effective tactical solutions.

8.4 Embedding the Process

Through facilitation, coaching, and governance support, we ensure your teams don’t just follow the process, but own it.

8.5 Continuous Improvement

We monitor performance metrics—service levels, forecast accuracy, inventory turns—and refine the process over time.

You can read more about our approach on our S&OP services page.

9. The Path to a Mature S&OP Process

Moving from ad hoc planning to a fully mature S&OP process takes time. A typical journey includes:

1. Foundation Stage – Establishing basic demand and supply reviews.
2. Integration Stage – Linking commercial, operational, and financial plans.
3. Optimisation Stage – Embedding scenario modelling and executive decision-making.
4. Transformation Stage – Extending into IBP and strategic planning.

10. Future Trends in S&OP for ANZ Businesses

• AI-Enhanced Forecasting – Machine learning models to detect subtle demand patterns.
• End-to-End Visibility – Linking supplier data, production schedules, and distribution networks in real time.
• Sustainability Metrics in S&OP – Integrating carbon footprint and resource efficiency into planning decisions.
• Resilience-Focused Planning – Stress-testing supply plans against extreme weather, geopolitical shifts, or supply disruption.

Final Thoughts

S&OP is not a one-off project—it’s a leadership discipline. In Australia and New Zealand’s complex and fast-changing markets, it gives organisations the agility to act decisively, the alignment to execute consistently, and the insight to allocate resources where they deliver the most value.

Whether you’re just starting out or looking to mature your existing process, Trace Consultants can help design, implement, and embed an S&OP framework that works for your unique context—delivering better service, stronger margins, and more resilient operations.

‍

Warehouse Design in Australia & New Zealand: A Practical Guide for Growth

Why Warehouse Design Matters More Than Ever

Today’s warehouses are far more than storage spaces; they’re critical hubs that drive service, cost-efficiency, and sustainability across supply chains. For businesses in Australia and New Zealand, geography, labour dynamics, and booming e-commerce make smart warehouse design a strategic necessity.

Whether you're replenishing perishable stock in suburban Melbourne, fulfilling fast-moving orders in Auckland, or balancing store and online distribution across ANZ, how you structure your warehouse impacts everything—from picking speed to energy usage and customer satisfaction.

If you want to understand how warehouse layout links to bigger supply chain performance goals, Trace Consultants takes a solution-agnostic approach—grounded in real operational needs, not property deals or vendor pressure.

1. Start with Clear Objectives and Local Realities

Effective warehouse design begins with clarity. What are you trying to achieve—faster deliveries, lower labour costs, better service levels, sustainability, flexibility? The Trace Consultants team always start with diagnostic work that looks at both current performance and future requirements before a single drawing is sketched.

In Australia and NZ, these objectives must also accommodate unique factors: sprawling distances, supply-chain bottlenecks in remote areas, labour tightness, and escalating sustainability expectations.

2. Best Practices That Shape a High-Performing Warehouse

Several design principles consistently lift performance:

• Understand your flows and volume. Map inbound goods, staging, stacking, picking, packing, and shipping—then align your layout to minimise unnecessary movement and physical touches.
• Prioritise one-way flow to avoid congestion and inefficiencies.
• Limit material handling touches—ideally to fewer than five during a single movement—to cut labour costs and boost accuracy.
• Optimise space and racking by balancing vertical storage with accessibility and safety.
• Integrate technology where it adds value, from warehouse management systems to automation or robotics—backed by a clear business case.
• Design for safety and sustainability, aligning with OH&S compliance and environmental goals.

Trace Consultants regularly blends these principles with modelling tools to forecast how a design will work under real-world volumes.

3. Warehouse Design Meets Broader Supply-Chain Strategy

Warehouse design doesn’t happen in isolation—it’s tightly linked to distribution network structure, facility location, demand patterns, and supply-chain resilience.

When Trace Consultants designs warehouse layouts, they consider omnichannel service models, inventory spread, transport footprints, and seasonal demand alongside physical layout.

4. ANZ Challenges—and How to Navigate Them

E-commerce Surge & Labour Pressure

With online growth continuing and labour markets tight, warehouses must be efficient, flexible and often automated to fulfil orders on time. Trace Consultants brings retail, FMCG, and industrial experience to solving these constraints.

Geographic and Logistical Constraints

From Perth to the Far North and across NZ’s islands, transport distances drive cost and complexity. Facility location and internal flow must work together to maintain service levels. This is where Trace’s network design expertise is crucial.

Sustainability Commitments

Modern warehouses must reduce environmental impact—whether through energy-efficient lighting, solar integration, or reduced transport miles. Trace Consultants integrates sustainability into both design and operational recommendations.

5. How Trace Consultants Can Help

Objective, Tailored Insights
Trace Consultants has no vested interest in selling a property or system, meaning you get independent advice designed for long-term success.

Retail-Specific Expertise
They understand Australian and NZ retail dynamics, omnichannel fulfilment complexity, and SKU-rich environments, supported by strong modelling capability. Learn more here.

Network and Layout Integration
They align your warehouse with the broader supply chain—whether it’s a DC, dark store, or micro-fulfilment hub—using network optimisation modelling.

Smart Automation Decisions
Trace guides automation choices—from AS/RS systems to IoT tracking—based on your specific operational needs. Read their perspective.

Process, Workforce & Sustainability
Layout changes are matched with process improvement, ergonomic design, and sustainability initiatives to lock in long-term performance.

End-to-End Execution
From strategy and design to implementation and change management, Trace Consultants supports the full journey.

6. A Typical Project Journey

1. Assessment – Review flows, inventory, throughput, and costs.
2. Benchmark & Modelling – Test scenarios and layout options.
3. Pilot & Iterate – Trial changes in a contained zone.
4. Roll-out – Implement approved design across facility.
5. Sustain & Learn – Monitor KPIs and refine over time.

7. Future Trends in Warehouse Design

• AI-driven slotting for faster picking.
• Autonomous vehicles and drones for internal and last-mile movement.
• Green infrastructure like solar rooftops and recycled building materials.
• Multi-use hubs supporting click-and-collect, returns, and rapid fulfilment.

8. FAQ: Warehouse Design in ANZ

What triggers a redesign?
Lease expiries, growth, e-commerce scale-up, M&A, poor DIFOT, or sustainability goals are common triggers.

How long does it take?
Initial layouts may be done in weeks; full execution across multiple sites can take 6–12 months.

Is automation worth it?
If your labour costs are rising or throughput demands are increasing, yes—when supported by a sound business case.

Final Word

In Australia and New Zealand’s competitive supply-chain landscape, a well-designed warehouse is more than efficient storage—it’s a strategic advantage.

By partnering with Trace Consultants, you gain a team that links warehouse design to network strategy, sustainability, and operational excellence—creating facilities that are faster, smarter, and built for the future.

‍

Procurement – Value Levers

Procurement is a strategic cornerstone for organisations aiming to control costs, improve efficiencies, and boost profitability. Far from simply negotiating prices, effective procurement focuses on multiple dimensions—leveraging value levers across vendors, product design, and internal processes. Understanding and employing these levers can unlock significant financial and operational benefits for businesses across Australia and New Zealand.

In this article, we'll explore key procurement value levers, offering practical insights into their applications and highlighting how Trace Consultants can support organisations to fully realise procurement’s potential.

Understanding Procurement Value Levers

Value levers in procurement are strategic actions and practices organisations use to influence the cost, quality, and sustainability of goods and services they buy. These levers fall into three broad categories:

• Vendor
• Design
• Process

Let’s dive deeper into each of these categories and explore their specific value levers.

Vendor Levers

Vendor-based procurement levers involve managing suppliers more effectively to drive better outcomes. Key vendor levers include:

Supplier Consolidation

Supplier consolidation involves reducing the number of suppliers to streamline procurement operations, leverage buying power, and simplify supplier management. Consolidation reduces administrative overhead, improves pricing through volume leverage, and can significantly enhance service quality due to closer supplier relationships.

At Trace Consultants, we work closely with our clients to identify strategic opportunities for supplier consolidation without compromising on risk management. Our deep market knowledge helps identify the right balance of supplier diversity and consolidation.

Reduced Packaging

Sustainable packaging practices not only deliver environmental benefits but can also significantly reduce costs. Organisations can work collaboratively with suppliers to reduce excess packaging, transition to reusable packaging options, and lower disposal costs.

Trace Consultants helps businesses undertake comprehensive packaging assessments and implements tailored solutions that align environmental goals with cost-saving objectives.

OEM or Low-Cost Country (LCC) Sourcing

Exploring Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) or sourcing from low-cost countries can substantially reduce procurement costs. Organisations must balance cost benefits against quality, lead times, and supply chain risks.

With our extensive global sourcing expertise, Trace Consultants provides practical guidance to identify, vet, and onboard reliable OEM or LCC suppliers, ensuring optimal value and minimal disruption.

Design Levers

Design levers revolve around influencing product specifications and solutions during procurement:

Substitution

Substituting materials or products with lower-cost or more efficient alternatives is a powerful design lever. Organisations can realise substantial savings through careful evaluation and substitution without compromising functionality.

Trace Consultants provides detailed market insights and assists clients in evaluating and validating suitable substitutes, ensuring functionality, compliance, and user acceptance.

Complementary Products

Bundling complementary products or services can yield better pricing and simplified procurement management. Consolidated procurement for complementary goods often leads to substantial savings through economies of scale and streamlined logistics.

At Trace Consultants, we work with procurement teams to identify complementary product bundling opportunities, ensuring alignment with organisational objectives and maximising value.

Standardisation and Customisation

Standardisation of components or customisation based on specific business needs are critical design levers. Standardising products or services reduces complexity, inventory costs, and streamlines procurement processes, while targeted customisation ensures functional alignment with unique organisational requirements.

Our procurement experts at Trace Consultants help organisations determine the ideal balance between standardisation and customisation to achieve operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Process Levers

Process levers focus on optimising procurement processes themselves:

Warranties

Negotiating warranty terms is an often-overlooked procurement lever. Better warranty terms can reduce lifecycle costs and protect organisations from unforeseen maintenance expenses.

Trace Consultants provides guidance on structuring warranty agreements that align with product lifecycles and operational needs, optimising long-term savings and risk management.

Direct or Distribution

Choosing between direct procurement from manufacturers or purchasing via distribution channels can significantly impact costs, inventory levels, and lead times. Direct purchasing typically offers lower costs, while distributors often provide greater flexibility and service.

We at Trace Consultants analyse procurement options, evaluating the total cost of ownership, service levels, and supply chain risk to recommend the most beneficial procurement channels for our clients.

Warehousing Optimisation

Efficient warehousing is crucial for reducing inventory holding costs, improving service levels, and optimising working capital. Organisations can achieve substantial cost reductions through strategic warehouse design, effective inventory management, and efficient logistics operations.

Trace Consultants specialises in warehousing optimisation, helping businesses implement effective warehouse networks, inventory management systems, and logistics practices tailored to specific operational needs.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

Trace Consultants is a boutique supply chain and procurement advisory firm dedicated to supporting Australian and New Zealand organisations achieve significant value through targeted procurement strategies. Our experienced team provides objective, practical, and tailored advice, ensuring each procurement initiative aligns closely with strategic business goals.

We offer:

• Spend Analysis & Optimisation: Identifying opportunities to rationalise, consolidate, and pressure-test costs and scopes of services.
• Strategic Procurement Reviews: Undertaking comprehensive reviews of existing procurement practices and recommending tailored improvements.
• Sustainable Procurement: Implementing strategies that reduce environmental impact, meet compliance standards, and leverage sustainability as a competitive advantage.
• Technology Integration: Leveraging advanced technologies like AI and analytics to provide deeper insights, automate processes, and facilitate better decision-making.

Our objective and solution-agnostic approach ensures organisations receive unbiased advice, positioning procurement as a strategic enabler rather than merely a cost-saving department.

Effective procurement involves far more than price negotiations—it leverages strategic decisions around vendors, design choices, and internal processes to unlock significant organisational value. By thoughtfully applying procurement value levers, businesses can improve their competitive edge, enhance efficiency, and significantly impact the bottom line.

At Trace Consultants, our procurement specialists collaborate closely with organisations, helping to identify, analyse, and implement targeted procurement strategies tailored specifically to their operational needs and strategic objectives.

Ready to explore how procurement value levers can enhance your organisation's performance? Contact Trace Consultants today and let's start the conversation.

‍

How to Use Agentic AI in Supply Chain – A Practical and Actionable Guide

Today's supply chains are increasingly complex, facing unpredictable demand, disruptions, heightened customer expectations, and global challenges. Businesses across Australia and New Zealand are turning to innovative technologies like Agentic AI to navigate these challenges in practical and tangible ways.

But what exactly is Agentic AI, and how can your business effectively implement it?

What Exactly is Agentic AI?

Agentic AI uses intelligent software agents that independently perform specific tasks, make decisions, and adapt based on real-time information. Unlike standard automation tools, Agentic AI systems continuously learn, proactively respond to changes, and operate autonomously, making them ideal for handling complex and rapidly changing supply chains.

Practical Uses of Agentic AI in Your Supply Chain

1. Improving Demand Forecasting and Inventory Management

One of the immediate benefits of Agentic AI is better demand forecasting. Traditional forecasting methods often struggle with the variability of markets. Agentic AI analyses large datasets, recognises patterns, and adapts quickly to changing conditions.

These intelligent tools can:

• Predict demand using historical sales data, promotions, and market trends
• Adjust forecasts instantly based on real-time data
• Recommend optimal inventory levels to avoid shortages or excess stock

2. Enhancing Visibility and Managing Exceptions

Many businesses struggle with having a clear view of their supply chains in real-time. Agentic AI provides active monitoring, quickly identifying problems and recommending actions.

Agentic AI helps you:

• Track shipments and highlight potential delays early
• Suggest alternative routes or suppliers when issues arise
• Automate responses to routine disruptions, speeding up issue resolution

3. Optimising Transport and Logistics

In transport and logistics, efficiency and cost control are critical. Agentic AI can independently handle route planning, scheduling, and selecting carriers.

Agentic AI applications include:

• Real-time optimisation of routes based on traffic, weather, and vehicle load
• Evaluating carriers and freight rates to select the most efficient options
• Maximising vehicle utilisation through load consolidation and backhauls

4. Streamlining Procurement and Supplier Management

Agentic AI significantly simplifies procurement processes, automating tasks from sourcing to vendor management.

With Agentic AI, you can:

• Automate routine procurement tasks such as creating purchase orders and managing vendor negotiations
• Continuously evaluate supplier performance to improve decision-making
• Manage contracts intelligently to secure better terms and pricing

5. Boosting Warehouse Efficiency and Resource Management

Agentic AI can drastically improve warehouse operations through smarter resource management and operational visibility.

These AI-driven solutions:

• Allocate resources based on current workloads and predicted demand
• Adjust workforce scheduling dynamically, reducing unnecessary labour costs
• Improve picking efficiency and automate inventory counts

Steps to Implement Agentic AI Practically

Implementing Agentic AI doesn't require a complete overhaul of your existing systems. Instead, focus on practical, achievable steps:

Step 1: Identify Quick Wins
Start by finding areas where AI can deliver rapid results, such as forecasting or transport optimisation.

Step 2: Utilise Your Existing Data
You don't need perfect data immediately. Start with what you have, and let AI systems refine accuracy over time.

Step 3: Implement Incrementally
Use an agile approach—start small, evaluate, refine, and then gradually expand the use of AI.

Step 4: Integrate with Current Systems
Choose Agentic AI tools that easily integrate with your current ERP, WMS, or TMS systems.

Step 5: Continuously Improve
Regularly monitor the performance of your AI tools and adjust them based on new information and business changes.

Key Benefits of Agentic AI for Your Business

• Efficiency Gains: Automating repetitive tasks frees staff to focus on strategic activities.
• Better Decision-Making: AI decisions are data-driven, reducing mistakes and improving outcomes.
• Increased Agility: Quickly adapt to market shifts and supply chain disruptions.
• Cost Savings: Lower expenses through smarter procurement, logistics, and inventory management.

How Trace Consultants Can Help Your Business

At Trace Consultants, we specialise in practical, results-focused supply chain solutions for Australian and New Zealand businesses. We understand the complexities of integrating AI and focus on making the technology accessible and immediately beneficial for your operations.

Trace Consultants assists by:

• Identifying Opportunities: Pinpointing where Agentic AI will have the greatest impact in your operations.
• Providing Pragmatic Solutions: We deliver AI tools that fit seamlessly with your existing systems and processes.
• Supporting Implementation: Our team works alongside yours to ensure effective integration and immediate usability.
• Continuous Optimisation: Regular performance evaluations and process refinements ensure ongoing improvements.

We don’t implement technology for its own sake. Our goal is always clear—delivering strategic, practical results that positively impact your bottom line. Agentic AI isn't a futuristic concept; it’s a practical tool available today.

Ready to Get Started with Agentic AI?

Agentic AI isn't about replacing your people—it's about equipping them with powerful tools to drive efficiency, responsiveness, and profitability.

Adopting a clear, practical approach will ensure AI quickly delivers real value. Start small, measure results, and scale effectively. Whether your goal is improved forecasting, streamlined procurement, or optimised logistics, the time to act is now.

If you're ready to explore the practical advantages of Agentic AI for your supply chain, Trace Consultants is here to help. Contact us to start your journey towards a smarter, more efficient supply chain today.

‍

Procurement of Preventative Maintenance Services – A Strategic Imperative for Heavy Asset and Infrastructure Industries

In Australia and New Zealand, organisations operating in infrastructure, mining, utilities, energy, ports, rail, defence, and transport rely heavily on high-value, long-life assets. For these industries, asset performance isn’t just a function of uptime—it directly influences operational capacity, workforce safety, regulatory compliance, and the bottom line.

With economic headwinds, regulatory pressure, and shifting expectations around ESG and cost efficiency, preventative maintenance is no longer a ‘nice to have’—it’s a critical lever in asset lifecycle management. Yet, despite its importance, procurement of preventative maintenance services remains under-optimised in many organisations. Contracts are often reactive, cost-driven, fragmented across assets, or fail to align with long-term operational strategies.

This article explores how to strategically approach the procurement of preventative maintenance services, the challenges asset-intensive industries face, and how Trace Consultants can help organisations unlock value from these essential services.

Why Preventative Maintenance Matters

Preventative maintenance (PM) refers to scheduled servicing and upkeep of assets to prevent failure and extend useful life. Unlike reactive or corrective maintenance, PM aims to address wear-and-tear before breakdowns occur.

In asset-intensive industries, PM is crucial for:

• Reducing Unplanned Downtime: Preventative schedules ensure critical assets don’t fail during production or peak periods.
• Extending Asset Life: Regular servicing delays the need for capital replacement.
• Minimising Safety and Compliance Risks: Failures in infrastructure, mining, or energy can have catastrophic consequences for workers and the environment.
• Managing Costs Over Time: A well-designed PM strategy reduces reactive spend, emergency callouts, and insurance claims.

While the operational benefits are clear, achieving these outcomes requires disciplined procurement and vendor management practices—not just skilled technicians.

Common Challenges in Procuring PM Services

Despite PM’s critical role, many organisations fail to fully optimise their procurement approach. Common issues include:

1. Fragmented Contracts and Siloed Assets

Organisations with multiple sites or business units often let each area procure its own PM services. This leads to:

• Duplication of effort and variation in scope
• Inconsistent standards and KPIs
• Missed opportunities to leverage scale for cost and service benefits

2. Overly Reactive or Time-Based Models

Many PM contracts are still based on rigid time intervals rather than asset condition or usage data. This can result in:

• Over-servicing of some assets
• Under-servicing of others
• Poor cost-to-benefit ratios

3. Insufficient Scope Definition

Scope of services is often poorly defined, leading to:

• Misalignment on what’s included/excluded
• Lack of accountability between owner and provider
• Ambiguity during contract performance reviews

4. Lack of Strategic Supplier Relationships

PM providers are often viewed as transactional service vendors, rather than long-term partners. This undermines innovation, continuous improvement, and responsiveness.

5. Difficulty Demonstrating Value

PM spend can appear as overhead. Without robust performance metrics or benchmarking, procurement teams struggle to demonstrate the value of preventative investment.

Key Considerations for Procurement Teams

To address these challenges, organisations need to apply strategic sourcing principles to PM procurement. Below are the core considerations.

1. Understand the Criticality of Assets

Not all assets are created equal. Procurement should align servicing models to asset criticality:

• High-criticality assets (e.g. high-voltage transformers, escalators in transport hubs, medical chillers in hospitals) may require condition-based or real-time monitoring.
• Medium or low-criticality assets can be serviced through a mix of scheduled inspections and standard intervals.

A risk-based segmentation approach enables prioritisation of spend and performance management.

2. Define the Scope Clearly and Consistently

Good procurement starts with a clear, consistent definition of:

• Asset categories and components
• Inspection, servicing, calibration, testing, and reporting requirements
• Access needs, site-specific constraints, and compliance needs (e.g. ISO standards, regulatory guidelines)

Trace Consultants often help organisations document their current state and develop functional scopes of work that align to ISO55000 asset management principles.

3. Consider Whole-of-Life Outcomes

Rather than just lowest cost per visit, sourcing strategies should consider:

• Expected life extension per asset category
• Reduced downtime risk
• Reduced reactive maintenance callouts
• Improved compliance metrics and insurance risk ratings

This moves the conversation from ‘price per hour’ to ‘value per outcome.’

4. Engage the Right Providers

Not all PM providers are the same. Procurement teams should assess:

• Experience with similar asset classes
• Ability to scale across sites and geographies
• Digital capability (e.g. condition monitoring, reporting tools)
• Safety record and compliance rigour
• Culture fit and partnership approach

Where appropriate, alternative contracting models like performance-based maintenance contracts or bundled service agreements may be more effective than transactional models.

5. Embed Reporting and Continuous Improvement

Contracts must specify clear KPIs such as:

• Completion rates vs. schedule
• Asset reliability improvements
• Downtime reduction
• Response and rectification times
• Audit findings and non-conformances

Embedding mechanisms for quarterly reviews, lessons learned, and innovation pilots strengthens supplier engagement.

A Strategic Sourcing Framework for Preventative Maintenance Services

Trace Consultants recommends a structured approach to PM procurement, using a strategic sourcing and transformation lens. Below is a typical methodology we apply.

Phase 1: Spend & Asset Base Analysis

• Review current PM spend, service contracts, and categories
• Analyse asset inventory, criticality, and condition
• Assess historical maintenance performance and cost drivers

Phase 2: Opportunity Identification

• Identify duplicate contracts, low-performing vendors, or high-reactive spend areas
• Conduct benchmarking on servicing frequencies, costs, and outcomes
• Evaluate internal vs. external service provision trade-offs

Phase 3: Scope and Specification Design

• Define standardised scopes of work and service level agreements (SLAs)
• Prioritise high-impact categories or assets
• Develop asset care plans by type and criticality

Phase 4: Market Engagement Strategy

• Develop Go-To-Market (GTM) strategy (bundled vs. category-based)
• Determine contracting model (e.g. term-based, performance-based)
• Prepare RFx documents with clear evaluation criteria

Phase 5: Supplier Selection and Contracting

• Support tender evaluations, negotiations, and supplier onboarding
• Finalise KPIs, reporting obligations, and escalation processes

Phase 6: Implementation and Performance Management

• Support transition to new providers or processes
• Embed contract management practices and digital dashboards
• Facilitate quarterly reviews and continuous improvement

Preventative Maintenance in Key Infrastructure Sectors

The approach to PM procurement must be tailored to industry-specific operating environments. Below are a few considerations across key infrastructure sectors:

Mining and Resources

• Assets operate in remote, harsh conditions; reliability is critical
• Fly-in/fly-out (FIFO) servicing models often apply
• Contracted providers need to meet stringent safety standards and operate 24/7

Transport and Logistics

• Rail, port, and airport assets require strict adherence to service windows to avoid passenger or freight disruption
• Shared asset environments demand clear accountability between multiple parties (e.g. lessor, operator, government)

Utilities and Energy

• Preventative maintenance plays a central role in network reliability and bushfire prevention
• PM plans must integrate with real-time SCADA and asset condition data
• Increasing expectations around ESG reporting linked to asset management

Social Infrastructure (Hospitals, Universities, Correctional Facilities)

• PM influences safety and comfort of occupants
• Growing expectation to bundle services (e.g. HVAC, plumbing, fire safety) for integrated FM delivery models

The Role of Technology in PM Procurement

Technology plays an increasingly important role in both the execution and procurement of PM services.

Asset Management Systems (AMS)

Robust AMS platforms (e.g. IBM Maximo, TechnologyOne, Assetic) enable:

• Asset lifecycle tracking
• Condition monitoring
• Maintenance scheduling
• Contractor integration

Procurement teams must ensure service contracts are structured to align with the organisation’s digital architecture.

Power BI and Analytics Dashboards

Dashboards enable procurement, operations, and engineering to:

• Visualise PM performance across sites
• Track contractor compliance
• Monitor asset performance trends
• Compare reactive vs. preventative ratios

Mobile-Enabled Field Reporting

Best-in-class PM providers offer digital tools that:

• Capture field servicing data in real time
• Flag defects and non-conformance immediately
• Auto-generate audit trails and compliance reports

Trace Consultants helps organisations design performance frameworks and contract requirements to ensure technology integration is considered during procurement—not as an afterthought.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we specialise in helping asset-intensive industries optimise procurement and performance across their supply chain and operations.

When it comes to preventative maintenance services, our approach is both strategic and practical. We partner with clients across Australia and New Zealand to:

• Analyse maintenance spend and vendor performance
• Define standardised scopes, SLAs and evaluation frameworks
• Develop Go-To-Market strategies and manage the procurement process
• Identify opportunities for cost reduction, bundling, or insourcing/outsourcing
• Support supplier transition and contract implementation
• Benchmark performance and enable continuous improvement through data

Our work is grounded in deep industry knowledge—from mining to energy, transport to healthcare—and we pride ourselves on being hands-on, trusted advisors.

By engaging Trace Consultants, clients gain not just procurement expertise but a team that understands the operating context of their assets and the broader strategic drivers behind their maintenance strategies.

To learn more about our services and recent work, visit our insights page: www.traceconsultants.com.au/insights

Preventative maintenance is no longer just an operational issue. For asset-intensive industries across Australia and New Zealand, it is a strategic lever for performance, risk mitigation, and long-term value creation.

Yet too often, preventative maintenance services are procured like commodity labour—without the strategic rigour, planning, and alignment to outcomes required to drive real impact.

As infrastructure ages, capital budgets tighten, and safety and compliance expectations rise, the organisations that treat PM as a strategic procurement category—not just a cost centre—will be best positioned for long-term success.

Whether you’re about to go to market, reassessing vendor performance, or looking to drive cost efficiencies, Trace Consultants is ready to help you transform how you procure and manage preventative maintenance services.

How well is your preventative maintenance procurement strategy working for you?

‍

Warehouse Network Design – For Retail Supply Chains

In today’s highly competitive retail environment, your warehouse network is more than just a place to store products—it’s a critical lever for enabling speed, reducing costs, and responding to customer demand with agility. Retailers across Australia and New Zealand are feeling the pressure to make their supply chains leaner, more responsive, and future-proof—and at the centre of this transformation is effective warehouse network design.

Whether you’re a supermarket chain managing fresh product replenishment, a department store balancing store and eCommerce stock, or an online pure-play brand scaling rapidly across states, how your network is structured will materially impact service, cost, and capital.

At Trace Consultants, we help retailers take an objective, data-driven and solution-agnostic approach to network design. In this article, we’ll explore what makes a well-designed warehouse network, why it matters, and how to avoid common mistakes that lock in inefficiencies and unnecessary spend.

Why Warehouse Network Design Matters in Retail

The role of your warehouse network is to ensure the right product is in the right place at the right time—at the lowest possible cost.

A well-designed network:

• Optimises inventory levels while maintaining availability
• Reduces transport kilometres and delivery lead times
• Supports omnichannel fulfilment (store, click & collect, and home delivery)
• Reduces duplication of infrastructure, inventory, and effort
• Enhances service levels and customer satisfaction
• Scales with business growth and seasonality without constant redesign

In contrast, a poorly planned network can result in bloated inventory, costly emergency replenishments, missed delivery windows, and fixed costs that outstrip business need.

Common Triggers for Network Redesign in Retail

Organisations don’t undertake a warehouse network redesign lightly—it’s typically driven by major change. Common triggers include:

• Lease expiries: Forcing a decision on whether to renew, relocate, or consolidate
• Growth into new markets: State-by-state expansion or trans-Tasman eCommerce fulfilment
• eCommerce acceleration: Needing faster fulfilment and more agile picking models
• M&A or consolidation: Harmonising supply chains across banners or brands
• High working capital or inventory duplication
• Increased service failures or DIFOT performance issues
• Sustainability goals: Reducing emissions and waste in the logistics network

If these sound familiar, it’s time to take a step back and look at your network through a strategic lens. Trace Consultants can help you assess your current network and model scenarios that align to your future business strategy.

Key Principles for Effective Warehouse Network Design

1. Objectivity is Critical

Network decisions should never be driven by opportunistic property deals or supplier pressure. These short-term “wins” often result in long-term inefficiencies. At Trace, we always begin with an objective diagnostic—free from pre-determined solutions—to define what the business actually needs.

We ask:

• What are the strategic goals of the business (growth, margin, service)?
• What level of inventory is needed to meet demand?
• What service levels are expected across channels and regions?

Our independence means our recommendations are free from bias—we don’t sell properties, lease facilities, or push automation unless it’s justified by the business case.

2. Solution-Agnostic Thinking

Being solution-agnostic means we don’t start with the answer. Instead, we help you explore the right trade-offs between:

• Centralised vs. decentralised networks
• Owned vs. leased vs. 3PL
• Manual vs. automated solutions
• Dedicated eCommerce fulfilment vs. integrated models

Every option comes with cost, complexity, and operational implications. Through scenario modelling, Trace enables you to choose the model that best suits your business—not just today, but in five or ten years’ time.

Explore how we support this approach on our Supply Chain Services page.

3. Inventory-Informed Design

Inventory and network design go hand in hand. Where and how you hold stock has a direct impact on:

• Working capital requirements
• Replenishment speed
• Safety stock levels
• Inter-DC transfers and inventory duplication

At Trace, we combine demand forecasting and inventory analytics to ensure the network is designed around SKU behaviour, not just site location.

We segment inventory by:

• Velocity (fast vs. slow movers)
• Size and handling complexity
• Channel-specific demand patterns
• Shelf-life or perishability

This ensures facilities are designed for real operational needs—not just what fits on a floor plan.

4. Service-Responsive Modelling

Network design is only valuable if it delivers on service. That means being explicit about:

• Store replenishment windows and cut-off times
• Online order delivery SLAs
• Frequency of dispatch to remote or regional locations
• Returns handling and reverse logistics

If your new network design can’t meet your service promise without driving up costs, it’s the wrong design. At Trace Consultants, we integrate fulfilment and logistics planning into every scenario.

5. Scenarios and Sensitivity Analysis

There’s rarely one perfect answer. That’s why robust scenario modelling is at the core of our methodology. Trace runs multiple configurations to explore:

• 2-site vs. 3-site vs. 5-site networks
• Hybrid own/3PL models
• Store vs. customer-fulfilment priorities
• Automation readiness and ROI
• State vs. regional vs. metro-focused strategies

We overlay volume projections, service metrics, labour availability, and transport costs to stress-test the options and build an evidence-based recommendation.

Critical Considerations in Retail Network Design

Beyond the strategic principles, retailers must evaluate several practical and commercial factors when redesigning their networks:

● Capacity and Throughput Planning

You must plan not just for average volumes but peak capacity—think Black Friday, Christmas, or end-of-financial-year promotions.

● Labour Availability and Cost

Warehouse performance hinges on your workforce. Proximity to labour markets, wage expectations, and temp/casual availability can make or break a site’s viability.

● Technology and Systems Readiness

WMS, OMS, TMS and planning tools need to support the network vision. A distributed model without system visibility will result in costly inefficiencies.

● Transport Integration

Warehousing and transport are interdependent. Every network decision must consider inbound linehaul, store deliveries, courier partnerships, and last-mile capabilities.

● Property Market Volatility

Lease duration, make-good clauses, exit flexibility, and capital investment requirements must all be carefully evaluated—especially in a volatile property market.

Trace Consultants’ multidisciplinary approach ensures you consider these dimensions holistically—not in siloes.

Impact on Inventory and Working Capital

A well-designed network doesn’t just cut freight—it frees up capital.

Poor network choices often result in:

• Inventory duplication
• Higher safety stock across nodes
• Inter-warehouse transfers
• Overstocking due to inaccurate replenishment logic

By integrating warehouse network strategy with inventory optimisation, we help retailers unlock working capital and reduce stock obsolescence.

Learn more about our Inventory and Planning support.

Risks of Poor Network Design

Getting this wrong can leave your business locked into multi-year costs and inflexible infrastructure. Common risks include:

• Sites that are underutilised or oversized
• Excess inventory in the wrong places
• Inability to meet service commitments
• Increased emissions and cost-to-serve
• High lease break penalties or stranded capital
• Failure to adapt to market or channel shifts

That’s why network design must be approached as a long-term, strategic decision—guided by data, not gut feel.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we work with some of Australia and New Zealand’s most recognisable retailers to design, model and implement high-performance warehouse networks.

We bring:

✅ Objective and independent advice – no vested interest in systems, property or suppliers
✅ Deep expertise in retail and omnichannel fulfilment
✅ Robust modelling tools and scenario planning capability
✅ End-to-end visibility from strategy through to implementation
✅ Experience across fresh food, general merchandise, eCommerce, and discount retail
✅ A collaborative style that brings your operations, finance and logistics teams along the journey

Whether you're reassessing your network post-COVID, planning a new distribution centre, or trying to reduce logistics cost-to-serve—Trace can support you through a structured, data-driven and pragmatic approach.

Explore our full range of Supply Chain Strategy and Optimisation services.

The warehouse network is not just the backbone of your supply chain—it’s a strategic asset that influences inventory, cost, service, and customer experience. For retail businesses in Australia and New Zealand, the stakes are higher than ever.

Getting the design right requires objectivity, being solution-agnostic, and a deep understanding of how your supply chain operates—from inbound freight and storage needs to customer service expectations and financial trade-offs.

If your business is considering network expansion, consolidation, or simply wants to sanity-check its current footprint—reach out to Trace Consultants. We’ll help you design a network that’s fit-for-purpose, future-ready, and financially sound.

‍

Maximising Workflow Efficiency Using My Aged Care Portal by Leveraging MS Power Apps

The Reality of Aged Care Administration

Anyone working in Aged Care knows that compliance and service go hand in hand. But too often, the administrative tools designed to enable care—like the My Aged Care (MAC) Portal—can feel more like a constraint than a capability.

For executives tasked with managing workforce costs, maintaining service continuity, and staying compliant with government requirements, the MAC Portal presents a common pain point. It's necessary for funding and accountability, yet it introduces friction into rostering, scheduling, and case management workflows. Repetitive data entry, fragmented approval processes, and lack of real-time integration with workforce systems often force frontline teams to work in silos, create duplicative workarounds, or fall into inefficiencies that ultimately impact both cost and quality of care.

But what if there was a better way? What if the MAC Portal wasn’t something to fight against—but something to design around?

At Trace Consultants, we’re seeing a clear shift: aged care providers are moving away from waiting for government IT systems to evolve, and instead proactively building tools around them. And one of the most effective enablers is Microsoft Power Apps.

The MAC Portal Challenge: Designed for Compliance, Not Efficiency

The MAC Portal is a critical platform for aged care providers—used to receive referrals, manage assessments, access client funding approvals, and meet reporting requirements. But while it supports government compliance, it wasn’t designed with seamless integration or modern user experience in mind.

Common pain points include:

• Manual data entry that needs to be replicated across scheduling, case management, and rostering tools
• Delays in referral visibility or assignment slowing down intake and onboarding
• Fragmented workflow between client approval and workforce scheduling
• Lack of integration with internal CRMs or workforce management systems
• High administrative burden on care coordinators, team leaders and schedulers

These gaps create operational inefficiencies and increase the risk of:

• Missed service windows or under-delivery against Home Care Package (HCP) or CHSP hours
• Inefficient workforce deployment and last-minute shift changes
• Reduced ability to forecast demand and match the right care worker with the right client
• Rising costs due to overtime, travel inefficiencies, and duplicated admin

In short, the MAC Portal is a reality—but it doesn’t need to be the limiting factor in your operating model.

Designing Around Constraints: The Power of Workflow Mapping

One of the most important first steps in improving efficiency is to map your existing workflow in and around the MAC Portal. That means asking:

• What actions are triggered when a referral is received?
• Where do handovers, duplication or rework occur?
• What tools (Excel, email, SharePoint, workforce software) are used downstream?
• Who is responsible for manually bridging gaps between MAC and other systems?

Once that’s understood, you can identify where digital tools like Microsoft Power Apps can automate, streamline, or enhance these processes—without needing to rebuild your core systems or compromise compliance.

This design-led approach ensures that your workflows are purpose-built for your organisation’s structure, care models, and technology stack—while still fitting around the MAC Portal’s constraints. Trace Consultants provides support in mapping these workflows and identifying digital tools that best fit your operations.

The Case for Microsoft Power Apps in Aged Care

Microsoft Power Apps is a low-code/no-code platform that enables organisations to build custom business applications that integrate with Microsoft 365, SharePoint, Teams, and other systems—even if they don’t integrate directly with MAC.

Why Power Apps is ideal for Aged Care:

• Custom workflows: You can build intake, scheduling, or service tracking tools tailored to how your teams work—not generic templates.
• Mobile-first: Apps work across desktop and mobile, enabling real-time updates from care workers, schedulers, and coordinators in the field.
• Data capture: Structured forms allow accurate data collection at the source—reducing rework and improving auditability.
• System integration: While MAC may not offer open APIs, Power Apps can link with your rostering software, payroll, SharePoint, and CRMs to fill the gaps.
• Automation: Combine Power Apps with Power Automate to streamline approval chains, notify staff of new referrals, or update care plans automatically.
• Scalable and cost-effective: Built on your existing Microsoft licence, Power Apps often avoid the cost and complexity of third-party integrations.

Trace Consultants has helped aged care clients build and deploy custom Microsoft Power Apps that fit within existing compliance frameworks while creating meaningful process improvements.

A Real-World Workflow Example

To make this real, let’s walk through a simplified care delivery workflow—and how MS Power Apps can improve it when working around the MAC Portal.

Scenario: Home Care Referral and Service Scheduling

Traditional Workflow (Pain Points Highlighted)

1. New HCP referral received via MAC Portal
2. Referral printed or copied into email to team leader
3. Admin manually enters client info into CRM and scheduling system
4. Team leader assigns case manager and care coordinator
5. Coordinator builds schedule in rostering tool or Excel
6. Care workers notified manually via SMS or calls
7. MAC Portal updated separately after visits completed

Challenges:

• Multiple data handovers
• Rework across CRM, MAC and rostering
• No visibility for care workers or admin staff in real-time
• Scheduling often misaligned with workforce availability

Improved Workflow with MS Power Apps

1. New referral received → Coordinator logs referral in Power App (structured form)
2. App pushes referral info to SharePoint and notifies care team
3. Coordinator assigns worker based on location, availability, skills (Power App links to roster data)
4. Auto-generated weekly schedule built in Power App, accessible via mobile
5. Visit outcomes logged by workers on mobile, triggering alerts if follow-up is needed
6. Power Automate flags services completed for MAC update and triggers internal QA processes

Benefits:

• Eliminates email/Excel duplication
• Reduces admin time and service delays
• Improves transparency across scheduling, rostering, and care delivery
• Enables better compliance and reporting without manual MAC re-entry

This type of solution is achievable when partnering with experienced consulting teams like Trace Consultants.

Unlocking Efficiency in Rostering and Scheduling

Effective rostering in aged care is about more than just filling shifts. It’s about aligning workforce capacity to demand, managing fatigue, and ensuring clients receive the right care, from the right person, at the right time.

By redesigning rostering workflows around the MAC Portal’s known constraints, aged care providers can:

• Streamline shift planning: Use Power Apps to create structured, automated processes for intake-to-schedule.
• Optimise travel: Build tools that factor in client locations and workforce geography to minimise travel time and costs.
• Enable responsiveness: Equip schedulers with real-time alerts and mobile tools to respond quickly to cancellations or changes.
• Improve client continuity: Match workers to clients based on past history, preferences, and continuity goals.
• Increase forecast accuracy: Track scheduled vs. actual service delivery to inform future workforce planning.

We work with providers to build these capabilities through tailored solutions. Learn more about rostering and scheduling improvement at Trace.

Risks of Not Acting

Many aged care providers are still relying on workarounds like spreadsheets, emails, and manual processes to bridge gaps between the MAC Portal and their rostering systems. These create:

• Hidden costs: Labour hours lost to admin tasks that could be automated
• Compliance risks: Inconsistent data and missed documentation
• Workforce frustration: Fatigue from manual scheduling, missed shifts or travel inefficiencies
• Client dissatisfaction: Inconsistencies in care quality or availability

With increased scrutiny on aged care delivery and funding models, inefficiencies that were once tolerated are now under the spotlight. Providers who continue to “make do” may struggle to meet compliance requirements, retain staff, or scale services cost-effectively.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we support aged care organisations across Australia by helping them optimise their service delivery through smarter workflows and practical technology deployment.

Our approach is grounded in:

• Deep understanding of aged care operational models
• Experience working within MAC Portal constraints
• Capability to build and deploy Microsoft Power Apps that support workforce planning
• Strategic focus on linking workflow changes to measurable cost and service improvements

Whether you're beginning your workflow transformation or looking to scale an existing initiative, our Supply Chain IT Transformation team can help you move forward—faster.

Why Now?

The aged care sector is under pressure to do more with less: more compliance, more hours delivered, more responsiveness to client needs—without increasing overheads. Investing in a smart, workflow-led approach to technology is no longer optional. It’s strategic.

With the Australian Government investing in digital transformation of aged care, and the sector moving toward more structured reporting and transparency, now is the time to build the digital muscle needed to thrive—not just survive.

Redesigning workflows around MAC and investing in tools like Power Apps is a practical, scalable way to build that muscle—delivering real ROI, improving staff experience, and ultimately enabling better care.

Turning a Constraint into a Catalyst

The My Aged Care Portal isn’t going anywhere. But that doesn’t mean your operating model needs to be constrained by it.

By designing workflows around its limitations, and using modern tools like Microsoft Power Apps, aged care providers can unlock significant value—reducing admin costs, improving rostering outcomes, and ultimately enabling more time for what matters most: delivering care.

At Trace Consultants, we specialise in helping aged care organisations operationalise these improvements—with a deep understanding of your workforce, systems, and service model.

Ready to rethink how you work with MAC instead of against it?
Visit our Contact Us page or reach out to our team to explore how we can help.

‍

Reducing Property Services Spend Through Effective Scoping and Go-To-Market

The Overlooked Cost Base in Critical Facilities

In complex environments like airports, hospitals, universities, integrated resorts, stadiums, and commercial precincts, the focus is often on front-of-house excellence—serving passengers, patients, students, guests, and crowds.

But behind the scenes, a quiet but significant cost driver is at play: property services.

Cleaning, security, mechanical, electrical, plumbing (MEP), waste management, and general contracting services represent millions in annual spend for most organisations. Yet they often go under-managed—locked into legacy scopes, loosely governed, and rarely put to market in a disciplined way.

Trace Consultants recently partnered with a major hospitality and entertainment group, helping them reduce their property services spend by ~24% through detailed scope optimisation and a structured go-to-market (GTM) process. The result wasn’t just lower cost—it was better service, clearer accountability, and long-term sustainability.

In this article, we’ll unpack how you can unlock similar savings and operational uplift—whether you're managing a terminal, hospital, campus, or commercial precinct—and how Trace Consultants can help.

Why Property Services Spend Often Escapes Scrutiny

Property and facilities-related services are foundational to operations—but also easy to overlook:

• Costs are spread across departments or sites
• Scope creep happens silently over time
• Performance is hard to measure (e.g. what defines “clean”?)
• Contracts are often renewed on rollover rather than tendered
• Teams managing contracts are under-resourced or decentralised

For high-footfall environments like airports and stadiums, the variability of demand—driven by flight schedules, events, or peak periods—adds another layer of complexity.

Meanwhile, universities, hospitals and integrated resorts face demands for 24/7 service, regulatory compliance, and increasing pressure on both quality and ESG outcomes.

Despite all this, property services are often treated as BAU—not as a strategic lever for performance and cost management.

Step 1: Understand the Scope – Because Not All Services Are Created Equal

Each category within property services comes with unique dynamics, compliance risks, and cost drivers:

Service CategoryCost and Complexity DriversCleaningShift patterns, loading, sqm, operating hours, deep cleans, consumablesSecurityStatic guards, mobile patrols, technology integration, licencing, response timesMechanical / ElectricalPreventative vs. reactive balance, asset lifecycle, location accessPlumbingEmergency vs. planned jobs, high-risk compliance, out-of-hours coverageWaste ManagementWaste streams (general, clinical, hazardous), disposal frequency, sustainability targetsGeneral ContractingMinor works, ad hoc repairs, procurement pathways, response SLAs

At Trace, we start with a forensic review of the current state, going beyond contracts and cost sheets. We map service delivery, challenge embedded practices, and walk sites with staff to understand where inefficiencies lie.

In airports, for instance, this might reveal:

• Redundant cleaning rotations in underutilised gates
• Security patrol duplication between public and restricted zones
• Inefficient maintenance scheduling around curfews or high-traffic windows

Understanding what’s really needed—and how it’s being delivered—is step one in reducing spend.

Step 2: Redesign the Scope – Don’t Just Cut, Optimise

A common trap is equating cost savings with cutting services. But real value comes from optimising scope, not arbitrarily reducing it.

Here’s how Trace typically improves scope effectiveness:

• Align service frequency to need: Not all areas require daily cleaning—e.g., back-of-house or staff corridors
• Right-size labour vs. consumables: Splitting these can uncover inflated margins or double-ups
• Rebalance in-house vs. outsourced: Some minor maintenance may be better insourced or bundled
• Modernise security models: Transition from static guards to technology-first solutions where appropriate
• Standardise waste processes: Clarify bin types, location zoning, and vendor responsibilities

For example, in our recent hospitality engagement, public area cleaning schedules had not been reviewed post-pandemic—despite significantly lower foot traffic in some venues. Adjusting scope to reflect current volumes created an immediate savings opportunity, without sacrificing guest experience.

Step 3: Go to Market With a Clear and Competitive Strategy

Going to market isn’t just about getting quotes—it’s about setting up vendors for success and driving competitive tension.

Trace’s category-specific GTM playbooks ensure that:

1. Scoping documents are clear and standardised across locations and vendors
2. Market engagement is broad—beyond the usual incumbent shortlist
3. Pricing templates are detailed and comparable, capturing all rate drivers
4. Evaluation frameworks balance cost, capability, innovation, and ESG
5. Commercial models and risk allocations are negotiated based on benchmarks

Airports and universities, in particular, benefit from this multi-category GTM model, allowing them to test bundling options while maintaining service differentiation.

Step 4: Explore Bundling vs. Specialist Contracts Strategically

Consolidating services under a single vendor can simplify management and improve pricing—but only if done right.

We recommend bundling only when:

• Services are naturally interdependent (e.g., mechanical and electrical)
• You have strong FM contract governance capability
• Vendors are genuinely multi-disciplinary—not sub-contracting behind the scenes
• There's clear service-level ownership and risk transfer

In contrast, specialist contracts may be preferable where:

• Service delivery is highly regulated (e.g., clinical waste in hospitals)
• The cost of failure is high (e.g., critical HVAC failure at an airport)
• Operational control needs to stay close to site management (e.g., cleaning at stadiums during events)

Trace helps clients model bundled vs. unbundled contract structures and run dual-track sourcing where needed—ensuring decisions are based on data, not convenience.

Step 5: Drive Long-Term Value with Contract Management Discipline

Securing a better deal is only half the battle. Sustaining the savings requires ongoing contract governance and performance management.

This includes:

• Service-level dashboards for cleaning compliance, security response, maintenance closures, etc.
• Monthly supplier reviews using actual data and agreed KPIs
• Audit and verification of vendor-reported performance
• Invoice compliance checks—especially around call-outs, overtime, and consumables
• Annual reviews of scope, standards and benchmarking

In our hospitality engagement, Trace supported the client in rolling out site-based scorecards for each service line. This drove:

• A consistent approach to supplier management across multiple venues
• Early identification of underperformance and rectification
• Improved stakeholder engagement at the frontline

This same playbook applies across sectors—whether you're managing a runway, a lecture theatre, a surgical theatre, or a retail precinct.

‍

Why Airports Should Be Paying Attention

Airports are uniquely complex environments:

• They operate 24/7
• They span vast, mixed-use spaces (public, restricted, airside)
• They face strict regulatory and safety compliance
• Their asset bases are ageing and high-maintenance
• They are under pressure to improve ESG performance

Despite this, many airports remain locked into long-standing vendor arrangements with little competitive testing or scope review. The opportunity to reduce cost, improve service resilience, and embed sustainability into the property services model is significant.

Trace has deep experience working in high-availability, compliance-driven environments and can bring mature procurement and facilities advisory capability to airport operations teams.

Broader Impacts: ESG, Sustainability, and Social Procurement

Property services now sit squarely within broader ESG and regulatory frameworks:

• Waste reduction and diversion from landfill
• Sustainable cleaning and chemical usage
• Emissions from contractor fleets and equipment
• Modern slavery and ethical sourcing in labour supply chains
• Local, Indigenous, and social enterprise supplier participation

Trace incorporates these into our scoping, GTM, and evaluation frameworks—ensuring savings are achieved without sacrificing social value or environmental responsibility.

For government-owned entities, universities, and airports bound by state procurement policies, this is increasingly non-negotiable.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

Trace Consultants offers end-to-end commercial and operational advisory to help your organisation take control of property services spend.

We specialise in supporting:

• Airports and transport hubs
• Hospitals and health networks
• Universities and education precincts
• Integrated resorts and event venues
• Retail and commercial asset managers
• Stadiums and major sporting venues

Our services include:

✅ Spend diagnostics and opportunity identification
✅ Scope review and optimisation
✅ GTM strategy and execution
✅ Vendor evaluation and negotiation support
✅ Contract performance frameworks
✅ Implementation planning and benefits tracking

We’re not just procurement people—we’re operators. We bring on-the-ground knowledge of how these services are delivered, and how they can be delivered better.

Property Services as a Strategic Lever

If you're overseeing a major asset or precinct and haven’t reviewed your property services spend recently, chances are you're leaving value on the table.

Ask yourself:

• Are our scopes aligned with today’s operational needs?
• Are our vendors delivering value, or just ticking boxes?
• When did we last competitively tender this category?
• Do we have the data and discipline to drive long-term performance?

Whether it’s cleaning at a terminal, security at a stadium, M&E at a university, or waste at a shopping centre, the same principles apply: clarify the scope, test the market, manage the outcomes.

Trace Consultants can help you every step of the way.

👉 Contact us to discuss how we can help you reduce costs, strengthen operations, and turn property services into a competitive advantage.

‍

NDIS Workforce Planning, Rostering and Scheduling: How to Bring Down Cost Base and Maintain Service

The High Stakes of Care Workforce Design

Across Australia, National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) providers, aged care organisations and government-funded care services are under increasing pressure. Inflationary cost pressures, increased scrutiny on service quality, a tightening labour market, and the ongoing shift toward consumer-directed care have made one thing clear: effective workforce planning is no longer a back-office function—it's a strategic imperative.

Care is personal. It happens in homes, communities, and facilities. But behind the scenes, the ability to put the right person in the right place at the right time—at the right cost—is where organisational sustainability lives or dies.

Rostering inefficiencies, workforce under-utilisation, or last-minute agency reliance can quickly balloon into unsustainable operating costs. At the same time, the complexity of service delivery—particularly in-home and mobile care—requires organisations to maintain high service responsiveness without letting costs spiral out of control.

At Trace Consultants, we’ve worked with providers across aged care, disability support, and government services to transform how they plan, schedule, and deploy their frontline teams. In this article, we explore the key levers to reduce workforce costs while maintaining service, and how you can start applying them today.

The Cost Challenge: Why Workforce is Your Largest Lever

It’s no secret: labour costs account for more than 60–70% of operating expenses across care-based organisations.

But it’s not just about wages.

The cost base is influenced by:

• Inefficient rostering patterns
• Under-utilised travel time
• Excessive overtime
• Overuse of high-cost agency staff
• Misalignment of staffing to demand
• Poor visibility across permanent, part-time, and casual staff capacity
• Fragmented scheduling systems

In the NDIS space, complexity multiplies due to variable funding structures, individualised care plans, location-based workforce challenges, and compliance requirements.

Without the right planning and scheduling infrastructure, organisations are often flying blind—leading to missed visits, cost overruns, or care that simply doesn’t meet expectations.

What “Good” Looks Like: Workforce Excellence in NDIS and Aged Care

Organisations that lead in workforce optimisation tend to exhibit several shared traits:

• Clear service design and workforce demand models based on geography, time-of-day, and skill type
• Optimised workforce mix (e.g., FTE, part-time, casual, agency) suited to demand variability
• Integrated rostering and scheduling tools that reflect real-time changes and preferences
• KPI visibility across cost per hour, billable vs. non-billable hours, utilisation, and missed shifts
• Minimal travel time and high shift continuity
• Forecasting capability that enables proactive recruitment or shift balancing

Most importantly, they are data-led in how they forecast demand, schedule supply, and track performance.

This requires a maturity lift in processes, people capability, and enabling technology. And that’s where many providers are now investing.

Five Levers to Drive Workforce Efficiency While Preserving Service

1. Align Workforce Strategy to Client Demand

Start by clearly defining your client promise:

• What type of service are you delivering?
• When do clients need it most (days, times)?
• Where are the clients located?
• What level of qualifications or support are required?

This demand profile should drive your workforce strategy, not the other way around.

Tools like heatmaps, time-of-day demand analysis, and client clustering can reveal patterns that help you structure a more efficient service model.

Trace Consultants helps organisations build demand profiles using historical data, booking trends, and NDIS plan analysis. This sets the foundation for workforce redesign.

2. Optimise Workforce Composition and Mix

Most providers carry a sub-optimal mix of:

• Full-time employees
• Part-time and casual workers
• Agency or contingent staff
• Subcontracted labour

Each has its place. But the mix must reflect the volatility of demand across services, time, and geography.

Over-reliance on casual or agency staff leads to cost blowouts, inconsistent care, and administrative overhead.
Under-leveraging permanent part-time staff can leave capacity on the table.

The right approach often involves building roster-friendly part-time models, training for broader skill coverage, and reducing dependency on high-cost temp options.

Trace works with clients to model the “future state” workforce mix aligned to demand and rostering best practice.

3. Improve Rostering and Scheduling Practices

Here’s where the rubber hits the road.

Good planning means nothing if it doesn’t translate into efficient, fair, and client-aligned rosters.

Common pain points we see include:

• Manual rostering using spreadsheets or basic scheduling tools
• Inconsistent shift allocation processes across service types
• Lack of continuity for clients or fragmentation of worker hours
• Excessive non-billable time due to gaps, travel, or cancellations

Modern rostering platforms can support:

• Optimised shift allocation based on distance, availability, continuity, preferences
• Automated travel time calculations and route optimisation
• Integration with demand forecasting engines and HR systems
• Real-time visibility of shift gaps and worker availability

Trace supports providers to assess current scheduling maturity, select fit-for-purpose technologies, and implement best practice scheduling governance frameworks.

4. Leverage Data to Improve Utilisation and Reduce Cost Per Hour

Understanding your labour costs shouldn’t be guesswork.

Yet many providers struggle to answer:

• What’s our true cost per hour of care?
• How much of our staff time is billable?
• Where are we seeing the highest leakage or inefficiency?

Dashboards that track cost per service type, staff utilisation, unavailable hours, overtime, and shift-fill rates are critical.

We help build reporting frameworks that don’t just inform—but enable managers to take action.

That could be:

• Rebalancing workloads
• Coaching underperforming team leaders
• Reallocating hours
• Addressing gaps in team coverage

5. Strengthen Planning and Forecasting Capability

Too often, rostering teams are reactive.

By embedding a demand-led planning cycle, your organisation can forecast future workforce requirements based on expected:

• Care hours
• Client onboarding
• Seasonality
• Geographic expansion
• NDIS funding cycles

With this foresight, recruitment, training, and rostering become proactive. You avoid lurching from crisis to crisis or building a workforce that doesn’t reflect client needs.

Trace Consultants brings forecasting models used in retail, health, and logistics sectors into the care context—enabling a more mature, analytical approach to workforce planning.

The Role of Technology: Choosing the Right Tools

There is no shortage of workforce and rostering platforms—AlayaCare, Lumary, Skedulo, ShiftCare, Humanforce, and others are commonly used across the sector.

But technology alone won’t solve broken rostering processes or a misaligned workforce model.

The right approach involves:

• Functional requirement development based on current vs. future state needs
• Assessment of system interoperability (HR, payroll, CRM, finance)
• Clear business case for investment (cost saving, service uplift)
• Strong change management and governance

Trace Consultants often supports clients with end-to-end technology reviews, vendor selection, implementation support, and benefits tracking—ensuring tools deliver real value, not just more complexity.

Redesigning for Home-Based and Mobile Care

As government policy continues to push toward community and home-based care, the challenge of rostering becomes even harder.

You now need to account for:

• Variable travel times
• Suburb-based zoning
• Client preferences for continuity
• Shift clustering across areas
• Route optimisation

Trace has worked with providers to develop rostering zones, mobile-first staff schedules, and route-based planning tools. These reduce non-billable hours and improve reliability—without adding cost.

Compliance, Quality and Cost: Finding the Balance

Providers often find themselves in a tug-of-war between:

• Cost efficiency
• Compliance and risk
• Service quality and continuity
• Workforce satisfaction and wellbeing

Poor rostering leads to burnout. Excessive agency use risks compliance. Budget cuts impact service access.

The only solution is smarter workforce design and stronger operating discipline—backed by data, process maturity, and the right tech.

How Trace Consultants Can Help

At Trace Consultants, we specialise in workforce planning, scheduling optimisation, and operating model transformation across complex service environments.

We’ve supported aged care organisations, disability services, health agencies, and government departments to:

• Build demand and workforce forecasting models
• Redesign rostering and scheduling processes
• Select and implement fit-for-purpose workforce tech
• Analyse and optimise workforce composition and cost base
• Strengthen KPI frameworks and reporting
• Improve service consistency, staff satisfaction and continuity

Our heritage in supply chain planning and operational optimisation gives us a different lens: we bring rigour, precision, and practical solutions—tailored to the nuances of human-centred service delivery.

Getting Started on Your Workforce Efficiency Journey

If you're an executive in the NDIS, aged care, or broader government-funded care system, now is the time to act.

The market is shifting. Service delivery is getting more complex. Labour will remain tight for the foreseeable future.

You can’t control funding levels or government policy—but you can control how effectively your workforce is planned, scheduled, and deployed.

Start by asking:

• Do we understand our demand profile?
• Are our rostering and scheduling practices helping or hurting?
• What’s our true cost per hour of care—and how do we improve it?
• Is our workforce mix aligned to our model of care?
• Are we using data and tech effectively to support decision making?

If you’re not confident in the answers, Trace Consultants is here to help.

Looking to reduce your cost base while improving service consistency?
Contact Trace Consultants to explore how better workforce planning and rostering can transform your organisation.

👉 Get in touch with Trace

‍

The Future of Management Consulting, with AI

A point of view by Shanaka Jayasinghe, Partner at Trace Consultants

Let me get this out of the way upfront: yes, I used AI to help draft this article.

Not because I couldn’t write it. But because, like everyone else, I’m learning how to use these tools effectively—and because it would be disingenuous to talk about the future of management consulting without using the very technology we’re all trying to understand.

AI is already transforming the way organisations think, plan, and operate. For consulting firms—especially those of us who work deeply in supply chain and procurement—this presents both a challenge and an opportunity. We must confront what AI automates, where human expertise still holds unmatched value, and how our role needs to evolve.

At Trace, we see this evolution playing out every day across our projects—from rethinking warehouse and transport networks, the automation of forecasting & purchasing decisions, to the redesigning back-of-house logistics for major hospitals.

The future isn’t about competing with AI. It’s about integrating it—so we can go deeper, act faster, and deliver smarter outcomes for our clients.

A Shift in the Consulting Project Landscape

In a short space of time, we’ve already seen a clear shift in the types of consulting projects clients are engaging. The era of the multi-year tech transformation—requiring armies of consultants, vendors, and SI partners—feels like it’s winding down. Whether driven by economic pressure, AI enablement, or both, organisations are now leaning into more agile, focused initiatives. The brief is clearer: reduce cost, move faster, unlock value.

Clients want surgical improvements to their business model—clear problems, straightforward solutions, pragmatic delivery, and real-time benefit tracking. It’s no longer about grand programs with abstract business cases. It’s about doing fewer things, better.

And in this environment, it’s not the “smartest” consultant who stands out—it’s the most helpful. The real value lies in the application of a solution, not just its design. Those who can implement change, navigate complexity, and deliver impact without overcomplicating it will outperform. That’s the difference between good and great—and it’s what will determine who thrives in the age of AI.

‍

Consulting’s Core Promise Hasn’t Changed—But How We Deliver It Must

Great consulting has never been just about providing answers. It’s about helping clients solve problems they can’t—or shouldn’t—tackle alone. It’s about building trust, embedding change, and transferring capability.

I read a fantastic piece on consulting back in 2018 that's shaped my perspective since. Robert Hillard wrote in The Mandarin, consulting is at its best when it’s:

• Trusted – grounded in long-term relationships, not transactions
• Transformative – unlocking change that sticks
• Transferable – leaving clients better equipped than before

These principles remain true in the age of AI. But how we deliver against them is changing—fast.

‍

A Growing Irony in the Consulting Sector

There’s a strange paradox emerging. Many global consulting firms are promoting AI as the key to competitive advantage. Yet in doing so, they’re also accelerating the commoditisation of some of their own services.

As a former Director at Accenture, I’ve seen firsthand how large firms—built for scale and capacity—are grappling with this shift. Their latest global strategy, as reported in the AFR, reflects a sharp pivot towards AI-powered service lines. But in doing so, many are caught in a tension between automating delivery and preserving value.

If AI can automate benchmarking, generate strategy slides, simulate business cases, and process supply chain data in minutes—then why engage a traditional consultant?

The answer, of course, is: it depends on what you want.

If you want a generic solution based on global best practice and internal toolkits, AI might be enough. But if you want something fit-for-purpose, grounded in the operational realities of your business, and actually implementable—then you still need people who understand how supply chains work on the ground, how technology integrates across the stack, and how to drive alignment across stakeholders.

That’s where the difference lies. And it’s where Trace has always focused our value.

The Spotlight on Big Consulting—and the Rise of Boutique Specialists

The broader context cannot be ignored. The PwC Australia tax scandal has prompted a wave of scrutiny around consulting engagements—especially within government.

Large firms, once the default, are now under more pressure than ever to justify cost, independence, and delivery value. In this environment, boutique firms like us have found greater traction—not just because we’re smaller, but because we’re specialists.

We bring deep, operational expertise in supply chain and procurement—not just strategy, but execution. We know how to redesign supply chain technology architectures and work with operators to optimise for outcomes - whether that be oriented towards driving service, growth or cost outcomes. We know what warehouse constraints actually look like on site. We know how to navigate and implement change in complex government and commercial environments.

What’s Becoming Less Valuable in Consulting

AI has already made some aspects of our profession redundant—and more change is coming.

Tasks like deck-building, benchmarking, financial modelling, and process mapping are being automated. These used to be core deliverables; now they’re inputs, or even by-products, of the real work.

Some forms of IT consulting, particularly those relying on offshoring or capacity-based delivery models, are at risk. Why engage a team to build a data model over three weeks when an AI tool can structure 80% of it in a day?

Clients expect—and deserve—faster, more efficient delivery.

Let’s call it out clearly:

1. Generic Benchmarking and Presentation Building

Once a differentiator, now a commodity. If you’re producing decks that repackage existing content, clients will quickly realise they can generate it themselves—with better data and in less time.

2. Surface-Level Expertise

Summarising industry trends or deploying generic maturity models without tailoring to the client’s operating model, commercial context, or tech stack is no longer good enough. Clients want specific, actionable insights.

3. Chargeable-Hour Based Operating Models

Charging for time rather than outcomes is under threat. When a task is automatable, the expectation will shift toward fixed-price, outcome-based delivery—especially in areas like procurement diagnostics, network design modelling, or demand planning.

Consultants need to go beyond what AI can do. That’s the new bar.

‍

What’s Becoming More Valuable in Consulting

As AI takes over commoditised tasks, the real value in consulting shifts to the things it can’t do—yet.

‍

1. Deep Domain and Operational Expertise

Nowhere is this more true than in supply chain and procurement.

From configuring a WMS system for complex warehouse flows to evaluating supplier transition risk across a hospital network, the nuance required can’t be faked.

Our clients choose us because we understand their operations at a granular level. We know what happens at the loading dock. We understand how a supplier shift affects patient flow, shift rostering, or site safety.

That’s not something AI can infer from a spreadsheet.

2. Human Connection and Change Enablement

AI doesn’t build trust. It doesn’t resolve tension in a boardroom or help a CFO navigate uncertainty in a capital project.

Consulting is still about people. That’s more true than ever in a world where technology creates answers, but humans make decisions.

3. Strategic Intuition and Decision Framing

AI can present options—but it can’t navigate trade-offs in a complex business environment.

Whether we’re advising on S&OP frameworks, indirect procurement strategies, or warehouse footprints, our clients value judgement—the kind that comes from doing it before, in multiple contexts, and knowing where to flex.

The Architecture Challenge: Data Disintegration in Supply Chains

If there’s one thing holding organisations back from AI-enabled transformation—it’s their fragmented system landscape.

In supply chain, we see this daily:

• ERP for finance and materials
• APS for planning
• WMS and TMS for logistics
• P2P for procurement
• BI tools for reporting
• All alongside countless excel spreadsheets!!!

‍

Each holds different data, structures, and timestamps—creating blind spots and inefficiencies.

This leads to:

• Limited visibility of landed costs or working capital
• Duplicate supplier records
• Misaligned planning and execution
• Excel-heavy workarounds

AI won’t solve this alone. But it can help:

• Integration layers to harmonise data
• Agents to fill data gaps with external benchmarks
• Decision engines to simulate outcomes across constraints

But only if consultants know how to apply it operationally.

‍

Bridging the Gap: From Data Fragmentation to AI Enablement

AI’s power is only as strong as the data it can access. In supply chain and procurement, fragmented systems often limit that potential. Legacy platforms, siloed functions, and poor integration can stall even the best AI tools. Effective consultants help cut through this. Drawing on deep operational experience, they guide businesses to prioritise tech investments with a practical lens—introducing targeted solutions that capture and connect the right data without overengineering. This approach maximises the impact of AI while keeping integration costs lean.

At Trace, we’ve helped clients unlock critical data and enable AI-driven planning, forecasting, and workflow automation. If you're navigating this space, reach out to Tim Fagan or Mat Tolley—they’re doing this work right now and can help you move faster, smarter.

‍

A New Model of Consulting: AI-Augmented, Human-Led

At Trace, we believe the future isn’t AI versus people—it’s AI plus people, each playing to their strengths.

Our model is simple:

• AI does the heavy lifting – data ingestion, pattern recognition, workflow automation
• Our consultants lead the thinking – alignment, change, solution design, implementation

Whether optimising a warehouse network, designing linen logistics for a new hospital, or deploying scheduling tools for aged care—our team uses AI to go faster but always lead with human judgement.

What This Means for Talent

The consultant of the future isn’t just a generalist. They’re:

• A systems thinker
• An operations expert
• A change leader
• A technologist (even if not a coder)
• A trusted advisor

At Trace, our team includes planners, engineers, operators, integrators—and the occasional AI enthusiast.

These are the people who will thrive in the future of consulting.

The More Things Change, the More We Need to Stay Human

AI will replace parts of consulting. But it will also elevate it.

Our job is not to resist the shift—but to lean into it with clarity, ethics, and courage.

To stop charging for what’s easy.
To focus on what’s hard.
To go deeper.
To be faster.
To stay human.

At Trace, that’s been our model since day one: operational depth, client intimacy, real-world results.

Yes, I used AI to help write this.

But it’s the human insight that makes it matter.